Access Services & Resource Sharing Working Group Updates and Goals
Stay updated on the progress and goals of the Access Services & Resource Sharing Working Group from March 22, 2016. Explore their initiatives in surveying, collaboration, communication, and goals for enhancing communication and training.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Access Services & Resource Sharing Working Group March 22, 2016
Group Members Matthew Prutsman, Los Angeles (Chair) Aleta Ashbury, San Francisco Stacy Caron, Fullerton Troy Compton, San Diego Steve Espinoza, San Marcos Christine Evans, Fresno Julie Kowalewski-Ward, San Jose You!
Surveying the landscape Made sure all campuses are represented on the ULMS Access Services listserv Created a survey of all CSU Access Services departments to determine staffing, policies and get an overview of the depth of services we are providing at different campuses. Looked for existing system-wide policies on resource sharing Made a collected names and roles of expertise at each campus in Access Services
Collaboration & Outreach Started initial planning for setting up an all access services meeting. (Possibilities: Sacramento, San Francisco, San Marcos, Los Angeles) Worked on coordinating with CRSP and I-SPIE to gather information and make decisions on resource sharing Monitored discussions on the ULMS Access Services listserv and monitored other ULMS listservs for overlap Spoke with Orbis Cascade Access Services staff
Communication Trying to keep an eye on the big picture and answer questions as they come to us Reaching out at the campus level to increase discussions Hosted 2 webinar meetings with the entire working group to discuss our priorities and any other areas of interest to the group and Alma features that the group is interested in Sent out several videos on Alma Access Services & Resource Sharing to listserv and solicited comments, questions, feedback
Goal 1: Communication and Training Timeline: Now until post-implementation Work on increasing activity in the listserv (ongoing) Access Services Meeting in North and South (late summer 2016) Determine fulfillment and resource sharing training needed for staff Help coordinate training needed
Goal 2: Test loads of data Timeline: Now until Spring 2017 Preparation for first test load (current) Testing after test load (begins June 2016) Training with test load data Preparation for cutover data load
Goal 3: Resource sharing Timeline: Now until Winter 2016 How will each different option (Alma, ILLiad, INN-Reach, etc) work? Can common policies be implemented CSU-wide? Possible Workflows for Users and Staff Analyze Statistics to discover possible impact on each library. Coordinating with CRSP, I-SPIE, etc Does the decision need to be made now? How can we help campuses who decide to keep INN-Reach? Leverage for better prices
Goal 4: Exploring CSU-wide Circ policies and parameters Timeline: Summer 2016 to Winter 2016/17 Why is this desired/necessary? What are the pros/cons? Take inventory of current landscape at each CSU Share and compare processes/documents/procedures Determine operational challenges at each campus to implementation Make recommendation of possible changes system-wide
Goal 5: Exploring CSU-wide fine and financial policies Timeline: Summer 2016 to Winter 2016/17 Why is this desired/necessary? What are the pros/cons? What can we do to make our lives in Alma easier? Take inventory of current landscape (Summer 2016) Determine operational challenges at each campus to implementation. What are the impediments? Who can make this happen? Make recommendation of possible changes system-wide
