
Accidental Infringement vs. Strict Liability: A Comparative Analysis
Delve into the debate between accidental infringement and strict liability in legal contexts, exploring the nuances of negligence, user incentives, and the cost of precaution in preventing accidents and addressing patent issues. This comprehensive comparison sheds light on the complexities of liability frameworks.
Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Accidental Infringement Patrick Goold City University
Strict Liability or Negligence?
The Case for Negligence 1 2 Preventing Accidents Equity Incentives for Bilateral Care Sharing Risk
User Incentives Yes Yes Owner Incentives No Yes Externalities Internalized No User only Admin. Cost Low Moderate Moderate Error Cost Strict Negligence Strict + Con. Neg. Negligence + Con. Neg. Moderate Yes Yes Owner only Moderate High Yes Yes User only High High
Strict Liability or Negligence?
Cost of Precaution (B) = Probability of Accident (P) x Loss (L) B> PL = Take less care B < PL = Take more care