Acquisition Community Feedback and Improvement Recommendations

team one n.w
1 / 6
Embed
Share

Receive valuable feedback and improvement recommendations from the acquisition community on various processes such as MRL, SOW, and more. Suggestions focus on reducing complexity, enhancing tailoring options, and engaging a broader stakeholder group.

  • Acquisition
  • Feedback
  • Improvement
  • MRL Process
  • SOW Feedback

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Team One Jack Galuardi SMC/APT Corp Paul Snyder Army CERDEC Melissa Malasmas Pratt & Whitney Nathan Braaten Boeing Heather Calhoun AMRDEC/PMO Jeff Samples BAE Systems Jeremy Heiskanen ODASD(SE) Kurt Hogue PEO-GCS-AMPV Mark Gordon OSD/Mfg Strategy Angela Babian AFRL/RXMS Ali Al-Hamdani AFRL/RXMS

  2. MRL 1 MRL 1 4 4 Feedback Feedback Is this effort Value added to the acquisition community? Yes with comment Recommended changes needed with proposed language Yes (document details trends) Identify the Issue/Concern and change recommended to address the issue Too prescriptive, MRL 1 (and sometimes 2) too early, too complex Retain the tone of the rest of the Matrix Comments green good, yellow tailored, red heck no! Any Additional Comments of Thoughts on what needs to be added or how best to continue this effort

  3. Additional Comments Need to engage a much broader S&T stakeholder group Need to see a draft for January

  4. Standard SOW Feedback Standard SOW Feedback Is this effort Value added to the acquisition community? Yes Recommended changes needed with propose language Yes, see proposed changes made Identify the Issue/Concern and change recommended to address the issue See comments Industry: Fewer shalls ($), avoid prescriptive language (How- Tos), Consistency in flow down reqts, Comments were not rated

  5. Comments or Thoughts Ask attendees for written feedback Army has a list to provide Add DMSMS clause under other Add general manufacturing Safety/ESH clause under other Instructions on what can be tailored (bold highlighted words) Need to have sufficient agreed to shalls to make informed decisions

  6. MRL Process What is working, what is not? What parts of Deskbook are tailorable (i.e., assessment process, MMP, Reports, etc.) What could make the MRL process better or more efficient? Consistency in contracting approach, workforce development, and BOK material (Matrix, Deskbook, Users Guide) What should the MRL WG concentrate on during 2019? Focus on training to examine current state and future state Planning, funding, availability, etc.

More Related Content