Advanced Solutions for Surgical Mesh Implants

slide1 n.w
1 / 18
Embed
Share

Explore innovative surgical mesh solutions such as synthetic and biologic options for safe, effective, and long-lasting hernia repairs. Learn about different materials, pros, cons, and potential complications associated with surgical mesh implants.

  • Hernia Repair
  • Surgical Mesh
  • Biologic Tissue
  • Synthetic Mesh
  • Medical Implants

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Z.Zarghamifard Fellowship of MIS

  2. Safe Effective Less pain Decreased recurrence Gold standard

  3. Inert Good strength Not allergen Avoid infection Easy handling Resist contracture Simple & inexpensive

  4. Synthetic Non-synthetic: Biologic Human tissue Useful in infected site High recurrence Names: Alloderm, Surgisis

  5. Mesh : Polypropylene & Polyester Fibroblast ingrowth Collagen deposition Long term fixation Sheet (membrane): e-PTFE (Gore-Tex) No fibrous response Less adhesion For intraperitoneal use

  6. Synthetic nonabsorbable Hydrophobic Electrostatically neutral Permanent Most popular Brands: monofilament Prolene (ethicone) Prolite (covedien) Marlex Polyfilament : Surgipro

  7. Parietex (Covedien) Mersilene (Ethicone) Inflammation & contracture as PP meshes

  8. Vypro & Vypro II (Ethicon): Light weight /Large pores Compose of multifilament PP + Vicryl Ultrapro: Light weight /Large pores (>3 mm) Monofilament PP+ Monocryl Lowest FBR Optimized handling Dual meshes: Goretex + PP PVDF + PP (new) PVDF: polyvinylidenflourid

  9. Minor (in %50): Seroma Discomfort & decreased abd wall mobility Major (rare) : Recurrence pain: Neuropathy / immediately after surg Chronic pain/ 1 year later/due to FBR Infection Fistula (FBR: foreign body reaction)

  10. Light weight with large pores (>1mm) meshes are better than heavy weight with small pores (<1mm) meshes

  11. Decreased restriction of Abd mobility: Flexible & elasticity like Abd wall Appropriate tensile strength less surface area in contact with host tissue: Decreased foreign body reaction Equivalent recurrence Less shrinkage(probably): Less fibrotic scar around mesh No fibrotic bridging in pores Similar infection Good handling

  12. First : heavy weight small porous meshes Second : light weight large porous meshes In the future : light weight large porous meshes

  13. Prevent migration or rollup Prevent shrinkage

  14. New pain in 23% of pt with fixation No difference in recurrence after 6 month

  15. Staples (10 mm port) Tacks : 5 mm port Counter pressure is needed Fibrin glue: Less chronic pain Equivalent recurrence Absorbable tacks Full thickness sutures

Related


More Related Content