Alignment of NIF and LGBF Measures Update
Explore the latest updates on aligning NIF and LGBF measures to improve monitoring and accountability in education. Comparison of indicators, proposals for improvement, and discussions on the number of awards and levels are covered in this informative update.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
LGBF and NIF Measures PIN/CAQ Update 15 March 2024
LGBF and NIF Update - Background Part of stretch aims discussion Improve alignment of NIF, LGBF and Stretch Aims Verity House Agreement Monitoring/accountability framework NIF/LGBF/Stretch Aim Measures similar for BGE Attendance Leavers Senior Phase Greater variation
LGBF and NIF Update - Comparison LGBF Indicators NIF Measures Stretch Aims CHN 4 and 5: % of pupils gaining 5+ awards at levels 5 and 6 (All SCQF Awards) % Leavers - 1+ at Levels 4, 5 and 6 based on SQA National Awards % Leavers attaining 1 or more award at SCQF level 5 and 6 CHN 6 and 7: % of pupils living in the 20% most deprived areas gaining 5+ awards at levels 5 and 6 (All SCQF Awards) Note: As set out in Summary Statistics for Attainment and Initial Leaver Destinations (SSAILD) (Based on Insight) Note: S6 based on S4 cohort
LGBF and NIF Update 2022-23 LGBF Report Published LGBF dashboard updated on a monthly basis Improvement Service moving to report on leavers Discussion around moving NIF to be based on SCQF (SSAILD would need to change) Question around number of awards and level
LGBF and NIF Update SG Proposal 1. SSAILD should align with the LGBF - Use all SCQF awards as part of the measurement Ensures parity of esteem across courses Aligns with Stretch Aims approach 2. SSAILD and LGBF moves to 2+ or 3+ awards - SG preference is 2+ as that would provide a measure of ambition for many young people Links to min requirement to go on to FE Less likely to generate perverse behaviours by becoming the single focus of activity in schools. 3+ would provide more of a stretch, but is more likely drive unwanted behaviour in terms of placing too much focus on increasing the number of qualifications awarded at the expense of what is actually best for each individual pupil.
