Analysis of the utility of the GRE in UW ChemE Admissions

Analysis of the utility of the GRE in UW ChemE Admissions
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Growing movement to stop GRE requirements in grad admissions, impact on specific student populations, financial considerations, and lack of predictive value for Ph.D. student success in STEM programs.

  • GRE utility
  • UW ChemE
  • Admissions
  • Student populations
  • STEM programs

Uploaded on Feb 15, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Analysis of the utility of the GRE in UW ChemE Admissions Elizabeth Nance *Used by UW ChemE faculty in Autumn 2019 to discuss removal of the GRE requirement

  2. Context: Why are we discussing the GRE? > There is a growing movement to stop requiring GRE for grad admissions1: 166 Bio/Biomed Ph.D. programs (including all of the top ones) have dropped GRE requirements or made GRE optional.2 104 Astronomy Ph.D. programs have dropped GRE requirements Computing and Computer Science programs are beginning (MIT, #1; UIUC #5, Cornell #6, Purdue #20) UW ECE dropped the GRE as an application requirement with a unanimous faculty vote > Important questions that are being asked: Do we use the GRE in our admissions process? Is the GRE prohibitive to specific student populations? Is the GRE predictive of student success (by any standard metric)? > Published data > Our *preliminary* data

  3. Published data for STEM PhD students

  4. Is the GRE prohibitive to specific student populations? > Short answer: yes Growing evidence that the GRE is biased against or at best, inadequately represents abilities of minorities, females, and lower income students.3,4,6 > There are significant financial considerations: Test prep course: $1000+ Test cost: $205 > Some students may/need to retake the exam Travel to take exam: $ location dependent Each score report request past the first Each score report request past the first four schools listed: $27 four schools listed: $27 > Students are often recommended to apply to 10-15 schools; many apply to more

  5. Is the GRE predictive of Ph.D. student success or performance? > Most recent analysis in 2017: data collected for 683 students (2003-2011) in Vanderbilt BME program; analysis included: Application info Self-reporting after graduation Mentor evaluation of student performance after graduation > Applicants with higher GRE scores get better grades in their grad courses. > GRE scores do not predict which students pass their qualifying exams or graduated, or how long they spent in the program.5 Moneta-Koehler et al (2017) PLoS One

  6. A more recent study in 2018 showed additional interesting trends > Our findings provide strong evidence that GRE scores are not predictive of STEM doctoral degree completion for U.S. and Permanent Resident students. > We found that GRE Q scores did not predict PhD completion for women in STEM programs. > unexpectedly, GRE Q scores were higher higher for men who left who completed PhDs. men with GRE scores in the lowest quartile finished at higher rates than any other group, a pattern seen in each of the four institutions. men in the lowest quartile had GRE Q percentile scores averaging approximately 34, and those in the highest quartile had percentile scores averaging 91. > GRE scores did not predict time to degree or foretell who would leave during or after the first year left than for those Peterson et al (2018) PLOS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206570

  7. UW ChemE MS and PhD data

  8. Is M.S. student performance (grad GPA) correlated to GRE scores? 4.0 MS degrees awarded in UW ChemE from A2015 W2019 ChemE Grad GPA GPA International 3.5 4.0 4.0 4.0 GPA Domestic ChemE Grad GPA ChemE Grad GPA ChemE Grad GPA GPA International GPA International GPA International 3.0 3.5 3.5 3.5 0 50 100 GPA Domestic GPA Domestic GPA Domestic GRE Writing Percentile 3.0 3.0 3.0 0 20 40 60 80 100 0 20 GRE Quantitative Percentile 40 60 80 100 0 20 40 60 80 100 GRE Writing Percentile GRE Verbal Percentile

  9. MS GRE score for international students plotted verse grad GPA GRE W% v GPA v Gender 100 Female 80 GRE W% v GPA v Gender Male GRE Q% v GPA v Gender GRE V% v GPA v Gender GRE Written % 100 100 100 60 Female Female Female GRE Quantitative % Male 80 Male 80 Male 40 80 GRE Written % GRE Verbal % 60 60 60 20 40 4.0 40 40 0 3.0 3.2 3.4 Grad GPA 3.6 3.8 20 20 20 0 0 0 3.0 3.2 3.4 Grad GPA 3.6 3.8 4.0 3.0 3.2 3.4 Grad GPA 3.6 3.8 4.0 3.0 3.2 3.4 Grad GPA 3.6 3.8 4.0 > General conclusion: no correlation between any GRE score and first year grad GPA for international MS students, and no difference between male and female students

  10. GRE scores for international students plotted verse number of quarters to finish MS degree Q to Graduate v GRE V% Q to Graduate v QRE Q% Q to Graduate v GRE W% 100 100 100 GRE Quantitative % 80 80 80 GRE Written % GRE Verbal % 60 60 60 40 40 40 20 20 20 0 0 0 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 2 4 6 8 10 Q to graduate Q to graduate Q to graduate > General conclusion: no correlation between any GRE score and the number of quarters to complete an MS degree for international MS students

  11. TOEFL scores plotted verse grad GPA and number of quarters to obtain MS degree for MS students GPA vs TOEFLI Q to Graduate v TOEFLI 120 120 110 110 TOEFLI TOEFLI 100 100 90 90 80 80 3.0 3.2 3.4 Grad GPA 3.6 3.8 4.0 2 4 6 8 10 Q to graduate

  12. Relationship between GRE percentile and grad GPA for PhD students (by gender) GRE Q% v GPA v Gender 100 Female GRE W% v GPA v Gender Male GRE Q% v GPA v Gender GRE V% v GPA v Gender GRE Quantitative % 90 100 100 100 Female Female Female GRE Quantitative % Male 80 Male 80 Male 80 90 GRE Written % GRE Verbal % 60 60 80 70 40 40 70 20 20 60 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 4.2 0 60 0 3.6 Grad GPA 3.0 3.2 3.4 Grad GPA 3.6 3.8 4.0 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.8 4.0 4.2 3.0 3.2 3.4 Grad GPA 3.6 3.8 4.0 Grad GPA P=0.0212 for Male students in GRE W% and Grad GPA

  13. Relationship between GRE percentile and grad GPA for PhD students (domestic v international) GRE W% v GPA v D/I 100 Domestic GRE W% v GPA v D/I International 80 GRE V% v GPA v D/I GRE Q% v GPA v D/I GRE Written % 100 100 100 Domestic Domestic 60 Domestic GRE Quantitative % International 80 80 International 80 International 40 GRE Written % 3.8 GRE Verbal % 60 60 60 20 40 40 40 0 20 20 20 3.0 3.2 3.4 Grad GPA 3.6 4.0 0 0 0 3.0 3.2 3.4 Grad GPA 3.6 3.8 4.0 3.0 3.2 3.4 Grad GPA 3.6 3.8 4.0 3.0 3.2 3.4 Grad GPA 3.6 3.8 4.0 P=0.0345 for Domestic students in GRE V% and Grad GPA

  14. Relationship between GRE % score and time to PhD degree Q to PhD v GRE W% v Gender 100 Q to PhD v GRE Q% v Gender Q to PhD v GRE v% v Gender Q to PhD v GRE W% v Gender Female 100 100 100 Male 80 Female Female Female GRE Written % GRE Quantitative % 80 Male Male Male 90 60 90 GRE Written % GRE Verbal % 60 80 40 80 40 70 20 70 20 60 0 0 14 16 18 20 22 60 50 14 16 18 20 22 14 16 18 20 22 14 16 18 20 22 Q to PhD Degree Q to PhD Degree Q to PhD Degree Q to PhD Degree

  15. Relationship between Grad GPA and time to PhD degree Q to PhD v GPA v Gender Q to PhD v GPA v D/I 22 22 Female Domestic Male International Quarters to PhD Quarters to PhD 20 20 18 18 16 16 14 14 3.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 3.2 3.4 3.6 3.8 4.0 Grad GPA Grad GPA

  16. Relationship between TOEFL score and Grad GPA for PhD students TOEFLI v GPA v Gender 130 Female Male 120 TOEFLI 110 100 90 80 3.0 3.2 3.4 Grad GPA 3.6 3.8 4.0

  17. Data for students who left PhD program Students who left GRE V% SWL GRE Q% SWL GRE W% Unidentified 100 100 100 - PhD not for them Failed general x2 - PhD not for them Failed general x2 - PhD not for them Female Female Female GRE Quantitative % 80 Male 80 Male 80 Male Failed general x2 GRE Written % GRE Verbal % 60 60 60 Unidentified Unidentified 40 40 40 20 20 20 0 0 0 3.0 3.2 3.4 Grad GPA 3.6 3.8 4.0 3.0 3.2 3.4 Grad GPA SWL GRE W% 3.6 3.8 4.0 3.0 3.2 3.4 Grad GPA 3.6 3.8 4.0 100 - PhD not for them Female Two female students left because identified PhD was not for them Failed general x2 80 Male GRE Written % 60 Unidentified 40 20 0 3.0 3.2 3.4 Grad GPA 3.6 3.8 4.0

  18. Current Admissions Process

  19. Notes from other ChemE departments > Caltech ChemE only requires the GRE for international students > UCSB ChemE was going to drop the GRE for this cycle, but is doing a trial run to see how important GRE scores are for them for the international schools to which we aren't well calibrated BUT they are still planning to drop the GRE for next admissions cycle > Efforts at Princeton to drop the GRE in ChemE have not gone well

  20. Do we use the GRE in our admissions decision-making process? Evaluation of PhD applications (current) > GPA & Individual Course Grades primary metric for first ranking Overall student performance (GPA), trends in course grades, grades in specific ChemE-related courses > References primary metric for second ranking Strength of recommendation; factors evaluated by referee, especially research performance; Selection of referees Note: this is a place where implicit bias is most prominent6 > Personal Statement Originality: Not cookie-cutter Authenticity: Interests and motivations described well and show maturity Persuasiveness: Statement makes a compelling case for admission Writing style: Logical progression, pacing, grammar, spelling Compliance: Within page limit (one page many were 2 pages, even 3 pages!)

  21. Do we use the GRE in our admissions decision-making process? Current evaluation of PhD applications near the cut-off > Review personal statement Careful reading, re-read as necessary Discuss among admissions committee (usually just GPA & GPC at this point) Identify possible admits Decline all others > Re-balance for primary interest and diversity > Make final selections for admission

  22. Do we use the GRE in our admissions decision-making process? Evaluation of MS applications (current) > Primary data: ChemE core course grades/GPA Get at least >2.7 for each class and >3.0 cumulative GPA > Secondary: Letters of recommendation, personal statement, and resume > Tertiary: TOEFL and GRE scores Focus on verbal and writing portions of GRE (anecdotal)

  23. References and Resources

  24. References 1. 2. Langin K. (2019) Science https://doi.org/10.1126/science.caredit.aay2093 Hall, J. Current list of bio/biomedical graduate programs that dropped, or plan to drop, the GRE: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1MYcxZMhf97H5Uxr2Y7XndHn6eEC5oO8XWQi2PU5jLxQ/edit#gid=0 Miller C and Stassum K. (2014) Nature 510, 303-304; https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7504-303a Miller C et al (2019) Sci Adv, 5(1) eaat7550; https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aat7550 Moneta-Koehler L et al (2017) PLoS ONE 12(1): e0166742. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0166742 Moss-Racusin et al (2012) PNAS 109(41), 16474-16479. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211286109 Peterson et al (2018) PLOS ONE https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206570 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

  25. Additional References Bell SM, Blumstein J, Brose K, Carroll A, Chang J, Charles J, et al. Defining success in graduate school. Mol Biol Cell. 2014; 25(13): 1942 1944. pmid:24970485 Benderly, B.L. GREs don't predict grad school success. What does? Science, Jun. 7, 2017. http://www.sciencemag.org/careers/2017/06/gres-dont-predict-grad-school-success-what-does Burton, N. W., and M.-m. Wang. 2005. Predicting Long-term Success in Graduate School: A Collaborative Validity Study. ETS Research Report Series 2005: i-61. https://www.ets.org/Media/Research/pdf/RR-05- 03.pdf Educational Testing Service. 2018. GRE: Guide to the Use of Scores, 2018-19. http://www.ets.org/gre/guide Educational Testing Service. 2017. A Snapshot of Individuals Who Took the GRE General Test. https://www.ets.org/s/gre/pdf/snapshot_test_taker_data_2017.pdf Hall, J. D., A. B. O'Connell, and J. G. Cook. 2017. Predictors of Student Productivity in Biomedical Graduate School Applications. PLoS One 12: e0169121. http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0169121 Kuncel, NR., Ones, DA and Hezlett, SA. 2001. A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive ability of the GRE: Implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychological Bulletin 127: 162-181. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11271753 Pacheco WI, Noel RJ, Porter JT, Appleyard CB. Beyond the GRE: Using a Composite Score to Predict the Success of Puerto Rican Students in Biomedical PhD Porgram. CBE Life Sci Educ. 2015; 14: 1 7. Posselt, J. R. 2014. Toward Inclusive Excellence in Graduate Education: Constructing Merit and Diversity in PhD Admissions. American Journal of Education 120: 481-514. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1034780 Posselt, J. R. 2016. Inside Graduate Admissions: Merit, Diversity, and Faculty Gatekeeping. Cambridge: Harvard University Press. (PDFs of Chapters 1 and 2 available by request to the Graduate Division.) Weiner, O. 2013. How should we be selecting our graduate students? Mol Biol Cell 25: 429- 430. http://www.molbiolcell.org/content/25/4/429.long Wilson, Mirenda A., Max A. Odem, Taylor Walters, Anthony L. DePass, and Andrew J. Bean. 2019. A Model for Holistic Review in Graduate Admissions That Decouples the GRE from Race, Ethnicity, and Gender. CBE Life Sciences Education 18:ar7, 1 12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/30735085 > > > > > > > > > > > >

More Related Content