Animal Glyphs in Aztec Codex Mendoza
Aztec glyphs with animal elements from the Codex Mendoza, featuring names in Nahuatl and English. Discover the meanings behind glyphs like Toad, Turtle, Crow, and more. The images showcase the intricate designs of these ancient symbols and offer a glimpse into Aztec culture and symbolism.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
DESIGN THINKING FOR USER EXPERIENCE DESIGN + PROTOTYPING + EVALUATION DESIGN THINKING FOR USER EXPERIENCE DESIGN + PROTOTYPING + EVALUATION Career Panel Prof. James A. Landay Computer Science Department Stanford University Autumn 2024 December 2, 2024
Administrivia Upcoming deadlines Mon, Dec 2 11:59 PM: A10 drafts due pitch slide & poster so we can give feedback Wed, Dec 4 noon noon: A10 poster due submit your final poster so we can get printed includes a video demo of your high-fi prototype Wed, Dec 4 11:59 PM: A10 pitch & demo video due a video demo of your high-fi prototype (you can & should revise video through Sunday) Thu/Fri, Dec 6 studio: A8 due this includes the final link to your prototype & README Sun, Dec 8 EOD: A11 (final report) due & revised video demos (A10) Project Questions? Project Fair Questions? Autumn 2024 dt+UX: Design Thinking for User Experience Design, Prototyping & Evaluation 2
Grading on the Midterm Part I-II (90) 73 (81%) 73 (81%) 8.1 (9%) 86 (95%) 44 (49%) Part III (60) 45 (75%) 46 (77%) 5.6 (9.3%) 56 (93%) 15 (25%) Total (150) Total (150) 118 (79%) 118 (79%) 120 (80%) 120 (80%) 10.9 (7.3%) 10.9 (7.3%) 137 (91%) 137 (91%) 80 (53%) 80 (53%) average median std. dev. high low Regrade request close at 5 PM on Sun., 12/8 Regrade requests need to be because the grader made a factual mistake If we see many regrade requests from the same person, we reserve the right to regrade the entire exam. factual mistake. Autumn 2024 dt+UX: Design Thinking for User Experience Design, Prototyping & Evaluation 3
Panelists Carah Alexander, Software Engineer, Duranta Pat Briggs, Engineering Manager, X (formerly Google [X]) Kristina Inouye, UX Research, Duolingo Taylor Lallas, Product Manager, ManageXR Vincent Nicandro, Product Manager, Walt Disney KiJung Park, UX Research, SAP Emily J. Tang, Group Product Manager, LinkedIn Emily Yang, Product Designer, Salesforce Autumn 2024 dt+UX: Design Thinking for User Experience Design, Prototyping & Evaluation 4
Next Time Wed Lecture Human-Centered AI my research Fri Studio (practice pitch for expo) Project Expo (140+ guests have RSVPd so far!) required attendance this is your final exam! Autumn 2024 dt+UX: Design Thinking for User Experience Design, Prototyping & Evaluation 5
