Assessment Framework for ReBrain Greece Proposals
Looking to assess proposals for ReBrain Greece? Explore this comprehensive guide on indicators, assessment framework, and criteria including relevance, quality of implementation, impact, and sustainability. Dive into alignment with objectives, solution maturity, participant experience, and more for a thorough evaluation.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Indicators/Assessment framework A guide for assessing the proposals ReBrain Greece
CEF( call) 1-10) A) Relevance B) Quality and efficiency of the implementation C) Impact and sustainability
A) Relevance 1) Alignment with the objectives and activities required in the work programme and in the call Alignment and synergies with EU-long term policy objectives, relevant policies, strategies and activities Assessment of content Assessment of targeting/specification level 2) 3) 4)
B) Quality and efficiency of the implementation 1) 2) Maturity of the proposed solution Coherence and effectiveness of the work plan Quality and relevant experience of the participants Extent to which the proposal demonstrates support from authorities, industries, ngo s Appropriate attention to security, privacy, inclusiveness and accessibility 3) 4) 5)
B) Quality and efficiency of the implementation 6) Range of the beneficiaries 7) Added value 8) Correlation with dynamic occupations and sectors (Diagnosis Mechanism)
C) Impact and sustainability 1) Quality of the approach to facilitate wider deployment and take up Capability to survive, develop and scale up without EU funding after the end of the programme Timescope of implementation( direct, within year, mid-term) 2) 3)
Slide Title Product A Feature 1 Feature 2 Feature 3 Product B Feature 1 Feature 2 Feature 3
