Asset-Based Valuation in Business Valuation

aswath damodaran n.w
1 / 14
Embed
Share

Learn about asset-based valuation in business valuation, where you value a company by assessing its individual assets, whether tangible or intangible. Explore when asset-based valuation is easiest to perform, including scenarios like separable assets, standalone earnings, and active markets for similar assets. Discover liquidation valuation and accounting valuation insights, along with the concept of sum-of-the-parts valuation.

  • Valuation
  • Asset-Based
  • Business
  • Liquidation
  • Accounting

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Aswath Damodaran 1 SESSION 20: ASSET BASED VALUATION #

  2. Asset Based Valuation 2 Aswath Damodaran 2

  3. What is asset based valuation? In intrinsic valuation, you value a business based upon the cash flows you expect that business to generate over time. In relative valuation, you value a business based upon how similar businesses are priced. In asset based valuation, you value a business by valuing its individual assets. These individual assets can be tangible or intangible. Aswath Damodaran 3 3

  4. When is asset-based valuation easiest to do? Separable assets: If a company is a collection of separable assets (a set of real estate holdings, a holding company of different independent businesses), asset-based valuation is easier to do. Stand alone earnings/ cash flows: An asset is much simpler to value if you can trace its earnings/cash flows to it. Active market for similar assets: If you plan to do a relative valuation, it is easier if you can find an active market for similar assets which you can draw on for transactions prices. Aswath Damodaran 4 4

  5. I. Liquidation Valuation In liquidation valuation, you are trying to assess how much you would get from selling the assets of the business today, rather than the business as a going concern. Consequently, it makes more sense to price those assets (i.e., do relative valuation) than it is to value them (do intrinsic valuation). To the extent that the liquidation is urgent, you may attach a discount to the estimated value. Aswath Damodaran 5 5

  6. II. Accounting Valuation: Glimmers from FAS 157 The ubiquitous market participant : Through FAS 157, accountants are asked to attach values to assets/liabilities that market participants would have been willing to pay/ receive. Tilt towards relative value: The definition focuses on the price that would be received to sell the asset or paid to transfer the liability (an exit price), not the price that would be paid to acquire the asset or received to assume the liability (an entry price). Split mission: While accounting fair value is titled towards relative valuation, accountants are also required to back their relative valuations with intrinsic valuations. Aswath Damodaran 6 6

  7. III. Sum of the parts valuation You can value a company in pieces, using either relative or intrinsic valuation. If you are long term, passive investor in the company, your intent may be to find market mistakes that you hope will get corrected over time. If that is the case, you should do an intrinsic valuation of the individual assets. If you are an activist investor that plans to acquire the company or push for change, you should be more focused on relative valuation, since your intent is to get the company to split up and gain the increase in value. Aswath Damodaran 7 7

  8. Lets try this United Technologies: Raw Data - 2009 Pre-tax Operating Income EBITDA Capital Expenditures Depreciation Total Assets Division Business Refrigeration systems Revenues Carrier Pratt & Whitney Otis UTC Fire & Security Hamilton Sundstrand Sikorsky $14,944 $1,510 $1,316 $191 $194 $10,810 Defense Construction $12,965 $12,949 $2,490 $2,680 $2,122 $2,477 $412 $150 $368 $203 $9,650 $7,731 Security $6,462 $780 $542 $95 $238 $10,022 Manufacturing Aircraft $6,207 $5,368 $1,277 $540 $1,099 $478 $141 $165 $178 $62 $8,648 $3,985 The company also had corporate expenses, unallocated to the divisions of $408 million in the most recent year. Aswath Damodaran 8 8

  9. United Technologies: Relative Valuation Median Multiples Division Business EBITDA $1,510 $2,490 $2,680 $780 $1,277 $540 EV/EBITDA for sector 5.25 8.00 6.00 7.50 5.50 9.00 Value of Business $7,928 $19,920 $16,080 $5,850 $7,024 $4,860 Carrier Pratt & Whitney Otis UTC Fire & Security Hamilton Sundstrand Sikorsky Refrigeration systems Defense Construction Security Industrial Products Aircraft Sum of the parts value for business = $61,661 Aswath Damodaran 9 9

  10. United Technologies: DCF parts valuation Cost of capital, by business Unlevered Beta Debt/Equity Ratio 30.44% Levered beta Cost of equity After-tax cost of debt Debt to Capital 23.33% Cost of capital Division Carrier Pratt & Whitney Otis UTC Fire & Security Hamilton Sundstrand Sikorsky 0.83 0.97 9.32% 2.95% 7.84% 0.81 1.19 30.44% 30.44% 0.95 1.39 9.17% 12.07% 2.95% 2.95% 23.33% 23.33% 7.72% 9.94% 0.65 30.44% 0.76 7.95% 2.95% 23.33% 6.78% 1.04 1.17 30.44% 30.44% 1.22 1.37 10.93% 11.92% 2.95% 2.95% 23.33% 23.33% 9.06% 9.82% Aswath Damodaran 10 10

  11. United Technologies: DCF valuation Fundamentals, by business Total Assets $10,810 Capital Invested $6,014 Allocated Reinvestment $353 Operating income after taxes $816 Return on capital 13.57% Reinvestment Rate 43.28% Division Carrier Pratt & Whitney Otis UTC Fire & Security $10,022 Hamilton Sundstrand Sikorsky Cap Ex $191 $9,650 $7,731 $5,369 $4,301 $412 $150 $762 $277 $1,316 $1,536 24.51% 35.71% 57.90% 18.06% $5,575 $95 $176 $336 6.03% 52.27% $8,648 $3,985 $4,811 $2,217 $141 $165 $261 $305 $681 $296 14.16% 13.37% 38.26% 102.95% Aswath Damodaran 11 11

  12. United Technologies, DCF valuation Growth Choices Cost of capital 7.84% Return on capital 13.57% Reinvestment Rate 43.28% Expected growth 5.87% Length of growth period 5 Stable growth rate 3% Stable ROC 7.84% Division Carrier Pratt & Whitney Otis UTC Fire & Security Hamilton Sundstrand Sikorsky 7.72% 9.94% 24.51% 35.71% 57.90% 18.06% 14.19% 6.45% 5 5 3% 3% 12.00% 14.00% 6.78% 6.03% 52.27% 3.15% 0 3% 6.78% 9.06% 9.82% 14.16% 13.37% 38.26% 102.95% 5.42% 13.76% 5 5 3% 3% 9.06% 9.82% Aswath Damodaran 12 12

  13. United Technologies, DCF valuation Values of the parts Cost of capital 7.84% 7.72% 9.94% PV of FCFF $2,190 $3,310 $5,717 PV of Terminal Value $9,498 $27,989 $14,798 Value of Operating Assets $11,688 $31,299 $20,515 Business Carrier Pratt & Whitney Otis UTC Fire & Security Hamilton Sundstrand Sikorsky Sum 6.78% $0 $4,953 $4,953 9.06% 9.82% $1,902 -$49 $6,343 $3,598 $8,245 $3,550 $80,250 Aswath Damodaran 13 13

  14. United Technologies, DCF valuation Sum of the Parts (SOTP) Value of the parts - Value of corporate expenses (Cost of capitalCompany-g) = $80,250 =Corporate ExpensesCurrent(1-t)(1+g) =408(1-.38)(1.03) (.0868-.03) = $ 4,587 = Value of operating assets (SOTP DCF) = $75,663 Value of operating assets (sum of parts RV) = $74,230 Value of operating assets (company DCF) Enterprise value (based on market prices) = $71,410 = $52,261- Aswath Damodaran 14 14

Related


More Related Content