
Britain's Role in a Changing World
Explore the implications of Brexit on British politics and international relations through alternative theories and ways of navigating interdependence. Discover the major intergovernmental links of the UK with global bodies and soft resources that enhance its international engagement.
Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
1 7/8/18 JW ANSWERING DEAN ACHESON S QUESTION; BRITAIN HAS LOST AN EMPIRE AND NOT YET FOUND A ROLE * PROFESSOR RICHARD ROSE DIRECTOR, CENTRE FOR THE STUDY OF PUBLIC POLICY BREXIT AND BEYOND: IMPLICATIONS FOR BRITISH POLITICS AMERICAN POLITICAL SCIENCE ASSOCIATION: BPG BOSTON 29 AUGUST 2018 *1962: quoted in Rose, 1964 , 2018
2 ALTERNATIVE THEORIES OF BRITAIN S ROLE IN THE WORLD *Hold the Balance of Power: Eyre Crowe, 1907 (Otte, 2003). * 3 Circles of Influence: Special relationship with the US;with the Commonwealth: with Europe (Churchill and Blair, but see Rose, 2001). *Unicorn Vision of Brexiters: UK central to US and Commonwealth. Leave out Europe Can t disprove until after Withdrawal *Remainers: Suicide of a Nation Again (cf. Gwyn and Rose, 1980) Remainrs reduces Britain s global trade, defence, immigration to Europe *Muddling through : To attain one s end in spite of blunder upon blunder. (Onions, 1936: 1294)
3 ALTERNATIVE WAYS OF MUDDLING THROUGH *Unilaterally: England as a Pond in Itself But part of the islands of Britain and Ireland *Collective polic making through collective institutions, e.g. EU, IMF, UN *Organized anarchy: a garbage can theory (Cohen, March & Olsen, 1972) *An interactive model of interdependent policymaking (Rose, 2014) .
4 PRIORITY UK POLICY AREAS INVOLVE INTERDEPENDENCE *Economy: Foreign exchange. Trade. Deficit. Labour supply * Multi-culturalism: Immigration * Domestic security: Crime. Terrorism * International security * Interdependent links vary with function.
5 MAJOR INTERGOVERNMENTAL LINKS OF UK EU NOT A MEMBER *Security Council of the United Nations: Permanent Seat *NATO: Third-largest military force and first in trust of Pentagon and CIA *CITY OF LONDON, :Leverage world s fifth-largest economy *IMF: Executive Board: Fifth-largest vote. *WORLD BANK: Executive Director: Third largest *OSCE: Organization for Security & Cooperation in Europe: Member state. *OECD: Member state *Council of Europe: Member state UK AND EU BOTH MEMBERS *World Trade Organisation *European Bank for Reconstruction & Development (Cf. Rose, 2015: Table 8.1; Global Britain: Government Response, 2018)
6 SOFT UK RESOURCES FOR INTERDEPENDENCE *Able civil service *Use of English as an international lingua franca *Opinion-forming media: BBC World News. Economist. FT *Many international-standard researchers in UK universities *UK graduates from many countries prominent globally (Cf. Portland and USC Centre on Public Diplomacy, 2018)
7 LIMITATIONS ON INFLUENCE IN INTERDEPENDENT SYSTEMS GIVEN *Voting rules: British politics is winner-take-all while interdependent decisions require a multi- national coalition. *Weak power of many intergovernmental institutions; coalitions of willing required *Population: Too big to be a small, rich state Too small to be a super-power *Ignores where EFL speakers (English as a Foreign Language) are coming from (Rose, 2008) SELF-IMPOSED *Confusion of what is distinctive in values of being English, British, English-speaking rather than common to Western or OECD nations or UN declaration of values *Ignores differences between immigrants from European, New Commonwealth. ESU *Seeks to be the power behind a non-existent Hegemon. *Special relationship with White House a one-hour event *Introverted SW 1 political discourse fixated on personalities, 24/7 media and solipsistic meetings with foreigners *Substantial popular distrust of elected representatives, parties.
8 BRITISH PEOPLE PERCEIVE GLOBAL RISKS; UNCERTAIN OF ALLIES Q. WHO CAN BEST HELP BRITAIN DEAL WITH MAJOR POLICIES? UN EU USA Looks after ourselves Problem DK (per cent) Global economy Military threats 8 18 6 46 22 26 8 20 26 20 Immigration 6 19 1 59 15 Terrorism Average ______________________________________________________ 23 11 14 34 18 16 14 10 41 19 (BMG Research, 2016; cf Bevington, 2018)
9 CONTINGENT OPPORTUNITIES *International demand for a country to fill the vacuum created by US abandoning leadership role Russia, China unacceptable. France over-ambitious *ABC (Australia, Britain, Canada) leadership Covers three continents with US. China. Europe as respective neighbours Combined population 11th in world Combined GDP fourth biggest bloc--but one-half or one-third USA, China or EU *International test cricket network: 12 countries Combined population more than 1.8 billion Members on four continents GDP $10 trillion, twice that of ABC , more than double UK *Socialism in one country : Corbyn & Seamus Milne LONG-SHOT POSSIBILITIES *UK breaks up: Scottish independence a challenge to Westminster. N. Ireland a relief *Eurozone/EU breaks up
CITATIONS 10 Bevington, Matthew, 2018. Leave Voters Do Not Want a Global Britain . www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/politics. Accessed 3 August 218. BMG Research, 2016. Birmingham: Online survey of a stratified sample of 1,517 respondents, 17-23 February 2016. Cohen, Michael D., March, James G. and Olsen, Johan P., 1972. "A Garbage Can Model of Organizational Choice", Administrative Science Quarterly, 17, 1, 1-25. Global Britain, 2018. London: House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee HC 780. Global Britain: Government Response, 2018. London: House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, HC 1326. Gwyn, William B and Rose, Richard, ed. 1980. Britain: Progress and Decline. London: Macmillan. Onions, C.T., ed., 1936. The Shorter Oxford English Dictionary on Historical Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press, Volume 1: A-M, 1294 Otte, T.G., 2003. Almost a Law of Nature? . In Erik Goldstein and Brian McKercher, Brian, eds., , Power and Stability: British Foreign Policy, 1865-1965. London: Frank Cass, 77-118. Portland and USC Center on Public Diplomacy, 2018. The Soft Power 30. https://softpower30.com/, accessed 3 August 2018. Rose, Richard, 1964. Politics in England. Boston: Little Brown & Co. Revised 2018: Politics in Britain . In G.B. Powell et al ., Comparative Politics Today: a World View, 12th ed., New York: Pearson, 132-173. Rose, Richard, 2001. The Prime Minister in a Shrinking World. Oxford and Boston: Polity Press. Rose, Richard, 2008. "Political Communication in a European Public Space , Journal of Common Market Studies, 46,2, March, 2008, 451-475. Rose, Richard, 2014. Responsible Party Government in a World of Interdependence . West European Politics, 37,2, 253- 269. Rose, Richard, 2015. Representing Europeans: a Pragmatic Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2nd edition.