Challenges of Coding Cancer of Unknown Primary: Survey in UK, Ireland, Australia
Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP) poses diagnostic and treatment challenges as the original cancer site is uncertain. This survey analyzes registration and reporting practices in the UK, Ireland, and Australia, highlighting the need for standardization to improve data accuracy and clinical understanding.
Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
National Cancer Intelligence Network The challenges of coding cancer of unknown primary A survey of registration and reporting practices in the UK, Ireland and Australia Claudia Oehler1, Claire Vajdic2, Nicola Cooper1, John Symons3 1 National Cancer Intelligence Network, Public Health England 2 University of New South Wales, Australia 3 Cancer of Unknown Primary Foundation, UK CRUK-NCIN Partnership Programme
Content Introduction to results of the survey on registration and reporting of Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP): 1. Overview: what is CUP? why is it problematic? 2. The survey: what was its purpose? 3. The results: what did it tell us? 4. Conclusion: what next? 2 Coding cancer of unknown primary - a registration and reporting survey in the UK, Ireland and Australia
What is cancer of unknown primary? Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is a diagnostic term for cancer which has spread from its initial location and where the original cancer cannot be determined with confidence. Context 9,762 cases and 10,812 deaths (UK, 2011); 16% 1-year relative survival; 57% emergencies (England, 2006-2010). ~8th most common incident cancer (ca.15% cancers present as metastases, 1/3 no obvious origin); ~5th most common cancer cause of death. 2010 first clinical guideline by National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) recommending diagnostic pathway and multi-disciplinary teams. 2013 first Peer Review Measures (internal validation by 133 Trusts). 3 Coding cancer of unknown primary - a registration and reporting survey in the UK, Ireland and Australia
Why is CUP problematic? Something 'unknown' is difficult to define and treat. Clinically heterogeneous and complex presentations; diagnosis often difficult to determine; morphology and extent of cancer crucial for outcome. Clinical uncertainty makes registration/coding of CUP difficult. Codes used for reporting CUP vary substantially: England: mainly four ICD10 codes C77, C78, C79 (lymphatic, respiratory/abdominal and 'other' metastases) and C80 (primary cancer site unknown) - regional variations. Others: solely C80, or additional ICD10 codes for ill-defined primary cancer sites, such as C26, C39 or C76 (ill-defined digestive, respiratory/intrathoracic, or generic sites, e.g. 'head and neck'). Obscures accurate assessment of CUP burden; nationally & internationally. Clear definition and consistent recording of CUP crucial for accurate statistics and clinically meaningful analyses. 4 Coding cancer of unknown primary - a registration and reporting survey in the UK, Ireland and Australia
Purpose of the survey? The aim was to compare CUP registration and reporting practices in the UK, Ireland and Australia, with a view to supporting improved national/international standardisation. Methodology: 20 registration services participated: 8 in Australia, the 8 regional NCRS in England, 1 each in Wales, Scotland, Northern Ireland and Ireland. 2-part questionnaire: Section 1 - Registration: coding guidance and system; coding scenarios; death certificate only; clarification process. Section 2 - Reporting: codes used for reporting; incidence by source of diagnosis and morphology. 5 Coding cancer of unknown primary - a registration and reporting survey in the UK, Ireland and Australia
What did the survey tell us? Caveat: these are draft results; registration services will be given the opportunity to comment before publication. To preserve the anonymity of individual responses, these are grouped: Registration offices in England and Australia are grouped as that; when individual answers are shown, these are numbered E1-E8 and A1-A8; these numbers were randomly assigned. Countries with a single national registry - Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland and Ireland - are grouped here to obscure the identity of any individual registry until permission is obtained to attribute results by nation. When individual responses are shown, these countries are numbered X1-X4; these numbers were randomly assigned and do not correspond to the order in which they are listed. Limitations: registration systems vary across countries; some of the differences may be due to a different casemix; a few questions were left blank / answers were unclear; April 2013, English registries merged to form National Cancer Registration Service. 6 Coding cancer of unknown primary - a registration and reporting survey in the UK, Ireland and Australia
What did the survey tell us? Survey confirmed variation in registration and reporting practices on almost every aspect covered. For example, coding guidance for CUP: Q1_Does your registry have guidelines that specifically cover the registration of CUP? Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland & Ireland 3 1 England Australia Yes No 5 3 3 5 55% 45% 7 Coding cancer of unknown primary - a registration and reporting survey in the UK, Ireland and Australia
What did the survey tell us? Question 4: Does a CUP cause of death get matched against a prior site-specific cancer registration? All registries (n = 20) England (n = 8) 6 6 5 5 Number of responses 4 4 3 3 2 2 1 1 0 0 Yes No Depends length & type Depends length Depends type Yes No Depends length & type Depends length Depends type {Comment only} 8 Coding cancer of unknown primary - a registration and reporting survey in the UK, Ireland and Australia
What did the survey tell us? Question 11: If additional information is sought from notifier(s), who would be contacted for it? Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland & Ireland England Australia England (100% = 8 registries) Q11.1_Notifying institution Q11.1_Notifying institution Q11.1_Notifying institution Q11.1_Notifying institution Q11.7_Hospital coding dept Q11.7_Hospital coding dept Q11.7_Hospital coding dept Q11.7_Hospital coding dept Q11.5_Treating doctor Q11.5_Treating doctor Q11.5_Treating doctor Q11.5_Treating doctor Q11.2_Referring doctor Q11.2_Referring doctor Q11.2_Referring doctor Q11.2_Referring doctor Q11.4_Primary care clinician Q11.4_Primary care clinician Q11.4_Primary care clinician Q11.4_Primary care clinician Q11.3_Pathologist Q11.3_Pathologist Q11.3_Pathologist Q11.3_Pathologist Q11.6_Radiologist Q11.6_Radiologist Q11.6_Radiologist Q11.6_Radiologist 0 2 4 6 8 0 2 4 6 8 1 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% 0 2 3 4 Always Sometimes Rarely Never No answer 9 Coding cancer of unknown primary - a registration and reporting survey in the UK, Ireland and Australia
What did the survey tell us? Question 18: Indicate the number of cases broken down by the basis of diagnosis/registration (source of information). 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% Pathology 40% Clinical DCO 30% Unknown 20% 10% 0% E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 X1 X2 X3 X4 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 England Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland & Ireland Australia 10 Coding cancer of unknown primary - a registration and reporting survey in the UK, Ireland and Australia
What did the survey tell us? Question 18: Indicate the number of cases broken down by the code used to report CUP [all translated to ICD10]. 100% C26 80% C39 C76 60% C77 C78 40% C79 C80 20% /6 or /9 0% E1 E2 E3 E4 E5 E6 E7 E8 X1 X2 X3 X4 A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 A6 A7 A8 England Scotland, Wales, Northern Ireland & Ireland Australia 11 Coding cancer of unknown primary - a registration and reporting survey in the UK, Ireland and Australia
What next? Beyond the survey - two key areas: registration processes and codes/coding systems. Registration processes Guidance for CUP: clarification of notification; source of diagnosis; follow-up Specific rules around death certificate notifications and matching to prior diagnoses (incl. clinical) England: impact of National Cancer Registration Service merger; but what about the wider picture (UK, Ireland, Australia; Europe and beyond)? Coding systems and codes ICDO3 codes ICD10 C-codes; better depth of data with ICDO3 (particularly metastases)? Australian method? Impact of CUP registration definition on mortality statistics? 12 Coding cancer of unknown primary - a registration and reporting survey in the UK, Ireland and Australia
Thanks! Thanks also go to the Australian registries for their participation. 13 Coding cancer of unknown primary - a registration and reporting survey in the UK, Ireland and Australia