Charge Sharing vs External Capacitor in HERD SCD Analysis

cce charge sharing vs external capacitor in herd n.w
1 / 21
Embed
Share

Explore the impact of charge sharing and external capacitors in the HERD SCD system through simulations and analysis. Discover how coupling capacitors affect CCE and signal requirements for different particles. Cross-checking with AMS-02 results provides additional insights.

  • Charge Sharing
  • External Capacitor
  • HERD SCD
  • Simulation
  • Analysis

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CCE & Charge Sharing vs External Capacitor in HERD SCD Rui Qiao; Wenxi Peng; Ke Gong

  2. Background: CCE & Charge sharing when hitting readout strip For 5% ratio, FOOT-150 has lowest CCE, IHEP- 25/IHEP-60/FOOT- 320/AMS has similar CCE around 80~85% around 80~85%. The coupling cap was around 30~50 pF 30~50 pF correspondingly. 5% charge sharing CCE

  3. Background: Hitting readout strip and floating strip DAMPE: DAMPE: Hitting Hitting readout readout strip DAMPE: DAMPE: Hitting Hitting float float strip Seed Seed ch. ch. Seed Seed ch. ch. strip strip Seed+1 Seed+1 ch. ch. Seed+1 Seed+1 ch. ch. Seed+2 Seed+2 ch. ch. Seed+2 Seed+2 ch. ch. Small coupling capacitance can improve charge sharing, but decrease CCE. Lower CCE with hitting float strip than readout strip.

  4. Requirement of coupling capacitor Z Signal Proton Z=1 Small Small signal ~3.67 fC (@ 0 deg) Iron Z=26 Large Large signal ~4270 fC (@ 30 deg) Impact position Z Signal Requirement Requirement Proton Z=1 Float strip Smallest Smallest signal Enough SNR Enough SNR Iron Z=26 Readout strip Impact position Largest Largest signal Large Dynamic Large Dynamic Signal Float strip Small Small CCE (60% for DAMPE) Readout strip Large Large CCE (100% for DAMPE)

  5. Analyze procedure: Channel CCE simulation: Hitting readout readout strip Channel CCE simulation: Hitting float float strip SPICE Interpolation of CCE with different impact position Deposited charge simulation PYTHON Channel amplitude simulation: interpolated interpolated impact position

  6. Cross-check using AMS-02 results The x side of AMS-02 has readout pitch of 110 um, similar to AMS-Upgrade which is 109 um. IP~0.3; Angle~10 ; coupling cap~70pF

  7. Channel CCE vs impact position: large coupling capacitance Detector: IHEP-60um Coupling cap.: 500 pF IP=0: hitting readout strip IP=0.5: hitting float strip Extreme small small charge sharing ratio hitting readout strip Hitting Hitting Readout Strip Readout Strip Hitting Hitting Float Strip Float Strip Hitting Hitting Readout Strip Readout Strip

  8. Channel CCE vs impact position: different coupling capacitance 500 pF 500 pF Coupling capacitance 10 pF 10 pF Coupling capacitance Hitting Hitting Float Strip Float Strip Hitting Hitting Float Strip Float Strip Hitting Hitting Readout Strip Readout Strip Hitting Hitting Readout Strip Readout Strip Hitting Hitting Readout Strip Readout Strip Hitting Hitting Readout Strip Readout Strip The impact of small coupling capacitance: Advantage Advantage: larger charge sharing ratio with hitting readout strip. Disadvantage Disadvantage: smaller CCE with hitting float strip.

  9. Charge Inject: From proton (Z=1) to iron (Z=26) Detector: FOOT-150um Coupling cap.: 500 pF IP=0, hitting readout st. Extreme small small charge sharing ratio hitting readout strip Z=1 Z=26 Readout strip 500 500 pF

  10. AMS-02 AMS [um] 320 [um] 12 pitch [um] 110 109 4 1 Ladder 760pF Sensor 70pF 15~1000 pF 70 pF

  11. Float strip 10 10 pF Float strip 500 500 pF Z=1 Z=1 Z=26 Z=26 Read strip 10 10 pF Read strip 500 500 pF Z=1 Z=1 Z=26 Z=26

  12. CASE 1: Proton(Z=1) hitting float strip For DAMPE SCD, we use 3.5 cluster finding algorithm, and use 1.5 the cluster. For HERD SCD, the SNR of the maximum channel should be large enough for the cluster finding efficiency efficiency if data compression is in need. Proton hitting float strip has the minimum well as the minimum minimum cluster finding efficiency 3.5*sigma to trigger the 1.5* sigma to end cluster finding minimum CCE, as

  13. CASE 1: Proton(Z=1) hitting float strip Ladder length (cm) Noise Level (fC) Project DAMPE STK 40 ~0.18 3 HERD SCD 90 ~0.41 The thin FOOT-150um detector has lowest SNR. The threshold of SNR puts a lower limit lower limit on coupling capacitance. 2

  14. CASE 2: Iron(Z=26) hitting readout strip Read strip 10 10 pF Read strip 500 500 pF Z=1 Z=1 Z=26 Z=26 The electronics expert suggest the non reliable reliable. The total signal amplitude without saturation as large non- -linear response is not linear response is not large as possible.

  15. CASE 2: Iron(Z=26) hitting readout strip Zoom A Zoom A: total amplitude without saturation increase increase with smaller coupling capacitance. Zoom B Zoom B: total amplitude without saturation drop drop with extreme small coupling capacitance. Zoom Zoom B B Zoom Zoom A A

  16. Combining Proton(Z=1) and Iron(Z=26) Z=1, float strip Z=26, readout strip Higher SNR Higher SNR With Larger capacitance Larger Signal Larger Signal With Medium capacitance

  17. Combining Proton(Z=1) and Iron(Z=26) Larger signal For Z=26 2 3 The IHEP Up Up have better performance to compromise Z=1 & Z=26. IHEP- -60 & AMS 60 & AMS- - Higher SNR For Z=1

  18. Combining Proton(Z=1) and Iron(Z=26) Total non-saturated signal amplitudes of Z=26 [fC] Detector Coupling cap. [pF] SNR of Z=1 IHEP-25 20 2.6 468 IHEP-60 50 3.3 444 FOOT-320 35 2.6 380 AMS-Up 35 3.1 426

  19. Combining Proton(Z=1) and Iron(Z=26) Total non-saturated signal amplitudes of Z=26 [fC] Detector Coupling cap. [pF] SNR of Z=1 IHEP-60 50 3.3 444 Z=26 Z=26 Z=1 Z=1 IHEP-60 Readout strip IHEP-60 Float strip

  20. Combining Proton(Z=1) and Iron(Z=26) Total non-saturated signal amplitudes of Z=26 [fC] Detector Coupling cap. [pF] SNR of Z=1 AMS-Up 35 3.1 426 Z=26 Z=26 Z=1 Z=1 AMS-Upgrade Readout strip AMS-Upgrade Float strip

  21. Conclusion SPICE simulation of CCE with readout & float strip incidence. Verified by AMS-02 results. Two extremes: Smallest Smallest signal: 0 degree proton (Z=1) hitting float strip Largest Largest signal: 30 degree iron (Z=26) hitting readout strip The coupling capacitance affects: The SNR when proton (Z=1) hitting float strip The total non-saturated amplitude when iron (Z=26) hitting readout strip The best sensors best sensors are: IHEP IHEP- -60 with 50 pF 60 with 50 pF coupling cap., SNR=3.3 for Z=1 AMS AMS- -Upgrade with 35 pF Upgrade with 35 pF coupling cap. , SNR=3.1 for Z=1

More Related Content