Child Protection and FGM Legislation Overview

The END FGM European Network Brussels, 28 January 2016 Best Interests of the Child in FGM Related Cases ANNE MARIE HUTCHINSON

Child Protection Issues The introduction of specific civil remedies to protect victims or potential victims of FGM should not be viewed as a replacement for child protection measures. It would be highly unusual where there is a real threat of FGM where it has occurred where the general child protection jurisdiction was not also invoked. In England and Wales our starting point would be the Children Act 1989. If the child is abroad it will be the Wardship/Inherent Jurisdiction.

Best Interest/Welfare of Children Section 1 of CA states Welfare of the child. (1)When a court determines any question with respect to (a)the upbringing of a child; or (b)the administration of a child s property or the application of any income arising from it, the child s welfare shall be the court s paramount consideration.

Children Act 1989 In England and Wales we would consider whether we should obtain orders under the Children Act 1989 Section 31 Care and Supervision Orders (Local Authority/Social Services) Child = under age of 17 years Places child in care of Social Services Threshold:- The child concerned is suffering or likely to suffer significant harm and The harm or likelihood of harm is attributable to (a) the care given to the child or likely to be given to him if the order were not made, not being what it would be reasonable to expect a parent to give him. Section 44 - Emergency Protection Orders (Police)

FGM Specific Legislation There is FGM specific legislation in England and Wales which is utilised in order to prevent FGM from taking place or to protect a child who may have already been subjected to FGM.

Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003 Under the Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003 a person was guilty of the offence of FGM in the following circumstances: Offence of female genital mutilation Offence of assisting a girl to mutilate her own genitalia Offence of assisting a non-UK person to mutilate overseas a girl s genitalia

Serious Crime Act 2015 The Female Genital Mutilation Act 2003 was amended by the Serious Crime Act 2015. The SCA inserted the following: Offence of failing to protect girl from risk of genital mutilation Female genital mutilation protection orders Duty to notify police of female genital mutilation

Section 3A Offence of failing to protect girl from risk of genital mutilation (1)If a genital mutilation offence is committed against a girl under the age of 16, each person who is responsible for the girl at the relevant time is guilty of an offence.

Impact of duty on individuals Section 3A (2)For the purposes of this section a person is responsible for a girl in the following two cases. (3) The first case is where the person (a)has parental responsibility for the girl, and (b)has frequent contact with her. (4)The second case is where the person (a)is aged 18 or over, and (b)has assumed (and not relinquished) responsibility for caring for the girl in the manner of a parent.

FGMPOs Power to make FGM protection order: 1(1)The court in England and Wales may make an order (an FGM protection order ) for the purposes of (a)protecting a girl against the commission of a genital mutilation offence, or (b)protecting a girl against whom any such offence has been committed.

Application An application may be made: By the girl who is to be protected by the order, or a relevant third party. Ex parte (without notice) At the county court or high court Where there are complex issues and ancillary orders such as passport orders are required, the application must be made at the High court.

High Court Jurisdiction Court has wide powers under inherent jurisdiction, where the children is court of jurisdiction and at risk of FGM, they need to be involved ay High Court. A v A [2013] EWHC 3554 (Fam) extended the jurisdiction to state that if you have a British national overseas you still have jurisdiction. This is a useful tool in FGM cases where child is a British national but may not have lived here or not lived here for a long time or has lawfully been sent to another jurisdiction and the child becomes at risk of FGM

High Court Orders If the application is made at the High Court we can protect a girl by obtaining the following orders if required: Prohibition of the FGM procedure taking place Passport order to prevent the removal of the girl from the jurisdiction Return to the UK if she has already been removed Port Alerts can be put in place

Case Study There was a British girl of age 7, she was ethnically Somalian. Her primary carer was her maternal aunt and father. Her mother was in Somalia. The mother returned from Somalia and stated she wanted to care for the daughter. She removed the daughter from the maternal aunt s care and took her to Somalia. The girl was at risk of FGM, as her mother and maternal aunt had undergone the procedure and this was viewed as a normal practice in the family. Father issues FGM and Wardship proceedings.

Case Study Continued We obtained the following orders: FGM orders to prevent the procedure Wardship order for return of the girl to the UK We were able to obtain a passport order against the maternal aunt in order to find out the location of the child

FGMPO Court Order

Wardship Order Order (a)Justice, Strand, London, if practicable after giving notice to the applicant s solicitors and to the court, for an order discharging or varying any part of this order. This right does not entitle you to disobey any part of this order until your application has been heard; No: FD14P00924 In the High Court of Justice, Family Division (b)if you do not speak or understand English adequately, to have an interpreter present in court at public expense in order to assist you at the hearing of any application relating to this order The Senior Courts Act 1981 The parties The Child Nawal Hashim Noor (a girl born on 03/04/04) 1.The applicant is HASHIM SHEIKH NOOR (represented by Dawson Cornwell), the father of Nawal. After hearing Anita Guha, Counsel for the Applicant The 1st respondent is Madina Hilowe Addow, the mother of Nawal. After consideration of the documents lodged by the Applicant The 2nd respondent is Ruun Addow, the maternal aunt of Nawal. After reading the statements specified in paragraph 6 of the recitals below 2.Unless otherwise stated, a reference in this order to the respondent means all of the respondents. After the making of a Passport Order in relation to the 1st & 2nd Respondents; ORDER MADE BY MR JUSTICE HAYDEN ON 25 SEPTEMBER 2014 SITTING IN PRIVATE Definitions 3.The Tipstaff is the enforcement officer of the High Court at the Royal Courts of Justice. He has a deputy and assistants and can authorise police officers to act on his behalf. Any obligation to give information to the Tipstaff or to hand over a document to him includes an obligation to do so to his deputy or assistant or a police officer acting on his behalf. PENAL NOTICE: IMPORTANT NOTICE to MADINA HILOWE ADDOW & RUUN ADDOW YOU MUST OBEY THE TERMS OF THIS ORDER, AND PARTICULARLY PARAGRAPHS 11,13 & 15 HEREIN. IF YOU DO NOT, YOU MAY BE FINED, SENT TO PRISON OR HAVE YOUR ASSETS SEIZED. 4.A Location and Passport order are orders directed to the Tipstaff authorising him to take steps to locate the respondents and to seize any passport or other travel documents from them. Recitals You have the following legal rights: 5.This order was made at a hearing without notice to the respondent(s). The reason why the order was made without notice to the respondents is because of the risks of harm to the child if the respondents were made aware of the application and the whereabouts of the 1st respondent are unknown. (a)to seek legal advice. This right does not entitle you to disobey any part of this order until you have sought legal advice; (b)to require the applicant s solicitors, namely Dawson Cornwell, 15 Red Lion Square, London, WC1R 4QT, tel 02072422556 to provide you with a copy of any application form(s), affidavit(s), note of oral evidence or other note of hearing referred to in paragraph 6 6.The Judge read the following documents: a.Statement of applicant dated 25 September 2014. 7.The court was satisfied on a provisional basis on the basis of the evidence filed that to apply, whether by counsel or solicitor or in person, to the Judge of the Family Court assigned to hear urgent applications at the Royal Courts of

a.Facilitating, allowing or otherwise permitting the person to be protected Nawal Hashim Noor (d.o.b. 03.04.04) to undergo any procedure involving female genital mutilation and the excision, infibulation or mutilation of the whole or any part of the child s labia majora, labia minora or clitoris; a.The child, Nawal hashim Noor was during the period from June 2014 until today s date and remained habitually resident in the jurisdiction of England and Wales; b.The child, Nawal Hashim Noor was wrongfully removed from England to Somalia on a date between June 2014 and 7 September 2014; and b.Using or threatening violence against the person to be protected Nawal Hashim Noor (d.o.b. 03.04.04) or otherwise instructing or encouraging any other person to do so; c.The courts of England and Wales have exclusive jurisdiction in matters of parental responsibility over the child pursuant to Articles 8 and 10 of BIIR. c.Intimidating, harassing or pestering the person to be protected Nawal Hashim Noor (d.o.b. 03.04.04) or otherwise instructing or encouraging any other person to do so; Undertakings to the court by the solicitors for the applicant 1.The solicitors for the applicant undertake: d.Upon Nawal Hashim Noor s (d.o.b. 03.04.04) return to this country, from removing, seeking to remove or instructing or encouraging any other person to remove the person to be protected Nawal Hashim Noor (d.o.b. 03.04.04) from the jurisdiction of England and Wales. a.To issue these proceedings forthwith and in any event by no later than 4 pm on 26 September 2014; b.To pay the ex parte application fee forthwith and in any event by no later than 4 pm on 26 September 2014; e.The 2nd Respondent shall not leave the jurisdiction of England and Wales. c.To serve these proceedings on the respondent at the earliest available opportunity, but subject to execution of the Tipstaff order and the applicant discovering the whereabouts of the 1st Respondent and child. 2.The injunctions as made at paragraph 11 shall continue until discharged by further order of the court. AND NOW THEREFORE THIS HONOURABLE COURT RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS: 3.The respondent(s), or each of them, shall: 2. Any person not within the jurisdiction of this Court who is in a position to do so to co-operate in assisting and securing the immediate return to England and Wales of the Ward, Nawal Hashim Noor (d.o.b. 03.04.04). a.By no later than 4 pm on 29 September 2014 notify the solicitors for the applicant Dawson Cornwell of the current whereabouts of the person to be protected Nawal Hashim Noor (d.o.b. 03.04.04) and the current care arrangements for them; IT IS ORDERED THAT: 3.The child, Nawal Hashim Noor (d.o.b. 03.04.04) is and shall remain a Ward of this court during his minority or until further order. b.By no later than 4 pm on 29 September 2014 notify the solicitors for the applicant Dawson Cornwell of the arrangements that will be made for the return of the person to be protected to the jurisdiction of England and Wales; 4.The respondent(s), or each of them, are prohibited from: a.Arranging, attempting to arrange, or otherwise instructing or encouraging any other person to subject the child Nawal Hashim Noor (d.o.b. 03.04.04) to any procedure involving female genital mutilation and the excision, infibulation or mutilation of the whole or any part of the child s labia majora, labia minora or clitoris; c.Return or cause the return of the person to be protected Nawal Hashim Noor (d.o.b. 03.04.04) to the jurisdiction of England and Wales in accordance with the arrangements notified at sub-paragraph b. (above) and by no later than 4 pm on 1 October 2014. 4.The matter shall be adjourned and relisted to allow the respondent(s) to make representations about this order (or any part of it) at a hearing before a High Court Judge of the Family Division sitting in private at the Royal Courts of Justice, The Strand, London, Wc2A 2LL on Thursday 2 October 2014 at 10.30am, with a time estimate of 30 minutes. b.Instructing or otherwise encouraging the person to be protected Nawal Hashim Noor (d.o.b. 03.04.04) to undergo any procedure involving female genital mutilation and the excision, infibulation or mutilation of the whole or any part of the child s labia majora, labia minora or clitoris;

1.The respondent(s) shall attend the hearing listed pursuant to paragraph 14 (above) together with solicitors and/or counsel if so instructed. 2.The respondent(s) may, if so advised, file and serve a statement of evidence by no later than 4pm on 1 October 2014. 3.Lambeth Social Services and Croydon Social Services are directed to file and serve by 4 pm on 1 October 2014 a letter or short report detailing all knowledge they have of past and current dealings with the child Nawal Hashim Noor (d.o.b. 03.04.04). 4.Permission is granted to the applicant to serve a copy of this order and papers in these proceedings upon the 1st Respondent outside the jurisdiction. 5.Permission is granted to the applicant to serve a copy of this order and papers in these proceedings upon the Foreign and Commonwealth Office, Lambeth and Croydon Social Services and Metropolitan Police and police in Somalia and their officers or servants or agents. 6.Costs reserved. Dated 25 September 2014.

FGMPO It is possible to envisage a situation where in all other respects the parents are good parents and there are no other risks should that child remain in the family home with the parents. THE FGMPO should prevent any risk of FGM in the future, the child could live with the family, so long as the parents accept the action is wrong, co-operate with authorities and support workers, and submit to an order.

Mandatory Duty to notify police of female genital mutilation There is now a mandatory duty to notify the police of FGM.

Section 5B Duty to notify police of female genital mutilation (1)A person who works in a regulated profession in England and Wales must make a notification under FGM notification ) if, in the course of his or her work in the profession, the person discovers that an act of female genital mutilation appears to have been carried out on a girl who is aged under 18. this section (an

Professionals Effected A person works in a regulated profession if the person is (i)a healthcare professional, (a person registered with any of the regulatory bodies mentioned in section 25(3) of the National Health Service Reform and Health Care Professions Act 2002 (bodies within remit Standards Authority for Health and Social Care) ) (ii)a teacher, or (iii)a social care worker in Wales; of the Professional

Duty Arises at Point of Discovery A person discovers that an act of female genital mutilation appears to have been carried out on a girl in either of the following two cases. 1. Where the girl informs the person that an act of female genital mutilation (however described) has been carried out on her. 2. Where (a)the person observes physical signs on the girl appearing to show that an act of female genital mutilation has been carried out on her, and (b)the person has no reason to believe that the act was, or was part of, a surgical operation within section 1(2)(a) or (b).

Notification Procedure Under Section 5B(5) the following procedure is to be followed An FGM notification (a)is to be made to the chief officer of police for the area in which the girl resides; (b)must identify the girl and explain why the notification is made; (c)must be made before the end of one month from the time when the person making the notification first discovers that an act of female genital mutilation appears to have been carried out on the girl; (d)may be made orally or in writing.

When the duty does not apply (6)The duty of a person working in a particular regulated profession to make an FGM notification does not apply if the person has reason to believe that another person working in that profession has previously notification in connection with the same act of female genital mutilation. This will have to be a substantial reason. Therefore to be on the safe side, it is better to report the matter then not act. made an FGM

Failure to comply with the duty Cases of failure to comply with the duty will be dealt with in accordance with the existing performance procedures in place for each profession. FGM is child abuse, and employers and the professional regulators are expected to pay due regard to the seriousness of breaches of the duty.

Health and social care professionals For health and social care professionals, failure to comply with the duty may be considered through fitness to practise proceedings by the regulator with whom the professional is registered. Regulators professional s ability currently to practise safely. This will therefore take all aspects of the circumstances of the case into consideration, including the safety of the individual child and her immediate needs. This may result in a wide variety of recommendations as to suitable action (e.g. re-training or supervision). Regulators may wish to issue guidance to their registrants as to how to act and when action may be taken will use their frameworks to consider a

Teachers For teachers, schools will need to consider any failure to comply with the duty in accordance with their staff disciplinary procedures. Where the school determines it is appropriate to dismiss the teacher as a result of the failure to comply, or the teacher would have been dismissed had they not resigned, the school must consider whether to refer the matter to the National College of Teaching and Leadership (NCTL) in England or the Education Workforce Council (EWC) in Wales, as regulators of the teaching profession. For teachers in England, the NCTL will consider referrals to determine whether the facts presented in respect of the individual s failure to comply with the duty are proven and whether they amount to unacceptable professional conduct or conduct likely to bring the profession into disrepute. If proven, the NCTL will consider whether it is appropriate to make a prohibition order which prevents the individual from carrying out teaching work in any school, children s home, sixth form college, and relevant youth accommodation in England. For teachers in Wales, in considering cases the EWC will look at the individual s conduct and consider whether their failure to comply with the duty was so serious that it should affect their registration, which may include initiating fitness to practise proceedings.

Summary The SCA 2015 amendments effects everyone individuals and organisations, as both have a duty towards an FGM victim. The current impact is that parents can be guilty of a criminal offence if they fail to prevent a girl from being subjected to an FGM. There is a mandatory duty on healthcare professionals, teachers and social workers in Wales to report FGM to the police, if they discover that that a girl is at risk or has undergone the procedure. An FGM Protection Order can be obtained to prevent an FGM taking place or to protect a girl who has already been subjected to FGM. Professionals should not fear appearing culturally insensitive or racist and must ask girls those direct questions is they have reason to suspect FGM or risk of FGM.

Useful Links http://www.cps.gov.uk/legal/d_to_g/female_ genital_mutilation/ https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/syst em/uploads/attachment_data/file/469448/FG M-Mandatory-Reporting-procedural-info- FINAL.pdf

Contact Details Anne-Marie Hutchinson Dawson Cornwell Solicitors 15 Red Lion Square, London WC1R 4QT Tel: 02072422556 Email: amh@dawsoncornwell.com Website: www.dawsoncornwell.com Twitter: @lawabduction

Thank you ANY QUESTIONS?