Clean Energy Alliance Regulatory Update
This regulatory update covers key developments in SDG&E's general rate cases, CEA's petition for modification in integrated resource planning, and issues related to utility generation costs and capacity investments. It also highlights upcoming expert testimonies and decision anticipated dates.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Clean Energy Alliance: Regulatory Update Tim Lindl & Jake Schlesinger Keyes & Fox LLP September 28, 2023
Overview A quick (re)introduction SDG&E s Phase I General Rate Case SDG&E s Phase II General Rate Case CEA s Petition for Modification in the Integrated Resource Planning proceeding 2
GRC Phase 1 Hearing in June, briefed in August Goal: Ensuring utility generation costs do not last in the PCIA in perpetuity. . . Miramar: Tens of millions of investment to increase capacity by 9 MW Costs go to 2004/2008 PCIA vintages SDG&E Claims all customers should pay Vintaging Framework: Analytical tool to ensure new investment in older UOG for capacity, extensions of life, or change in nature is properly vintaged PG&E Update 3
GRC Phase 2 Status: Discovery/investigation on two main issues: #1 Rate and Tariff Design PCIA bundled PCIA unbundled CARE discount #2 Schedule S (Standby Service) Impossible for SD CCAs to serve Not consistent with other IOUs Next Steps: Expert testimony in January 4
Integrated Resource Planning Issue: Prior Commission decision required SDG&E to purchase 49 MW of capacity just before 86,000 departures in Escondido and San Marcos (and 200k departures in SDCP service territory) Commission acknowledged unfairness and allowed CEA to purchase capacity from SDG&E SDG&E refused to provide enough capacity to account for Escondido and San Marcos CEA filed for clarification to avoid $50-$96M in costs over the next 12 years among both SD-area CCAs Proposed Decision denies CEA request Next Steps: Decision anticipate October 12 5
QUESTIONS? Tim Lindl / Jake Schlesinger tlindl@keyesfox.com / jschlesinger@keyesfox.com 510-314-8385 / 970-531-2525 6
