
Collaborative Proposal to Increase Bus Ridership & Reduce Congestion
Explore the proposal by Belmont Schools to boost bus ridership, decrease congestion, and enhance biker/walker safety through a parent survey. Findings highlight factors influencing bus usage, parent preferences, and potential solutions. Discover insights on bus fees, student parking, and strategies to promote sustainable transportation choices.
Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Belmont Schools: A Collaborative Proposal to Increase Bus Ridership, Reduce Congestion, and Increase Biker/Walker Safety PARENT SURVEY RESULTS SCHOOL COMMITTEE, SCHOOL DEPT AND TRAFFIC ADVISORY COMM (TAC) JANUARY 17, 2023
Preamble Survey Objectives Gather parent feedback re bus timing, costs, parking and other factors to see if Belmont can achieve Lexington s significant ridership increase from fee cutting pilot program (c. 2012) Identify motivators, especially for HS/Upper MS Parents to leverage historic Chenery site preference for bus transit, at new site If adjustments indicate higher bus ridership, would lower Concord Ave corridor of significant parent traffic and congestion Using responses, assess how altering bus run timing and school session hours could encourage more bus usage Test market for implementation and size of future student parking fees 2 DRAFT
Background/Issues: Concord Ave corridor suffers heavy congestion; Parents and HS students are a significant portion during peak hours FY/24 adds 2 grade levels and current bus costs loom higher as many families will have multiple students at the site Inequitable cost of bus vs. free student parking or parent driving promotes more traffic; perception of free conflicts with actual research (ex. Dr. Donald Shoup: Appropriate costs yield reliable 15% vacancy, suppress unnecessary driving/parking; fails to factor in wasted space, idling/pollution or neighborhood angst; parking revenues further subsidize bus costs and safety improvements Barely sufficient student parking, insufficient/unsafe drop zones 3
Survey Results: Over 33% of Actual Students Represented Balanced coverage of ages, schools, distances and modes of transit Primary reasons parents or students drive: Heavy bags/instruments, inconvenient bus timing, cost, safety of walkers/bikers Cost and scheduling were overwhelming top reasons against HS Bus usage (HS buses arrive a full hour prior to start of day, and afternoon bus 30-40 minutes after last period) Safety concerns (sidewalk condition, traffic, crossings) another predominate factor for parent driving, particularly Elem and MS levels 4 DRAFT
High Parent Drives/Carpools response to lowering Bus fees: 60% chose significantly lower fees vs. current ($360 or less, down to NONE or No Fee ) An incremental 100 chose $450 , raising lower fees aggregate to 70% Of HS Parents Driving/Carpooling, 38% mentioned Cost of Bus as their rationale for driving or not using the School Bus Heavy Bags, Bus Timing/Availability, and Student s/Parent s Schedule were very high factors as well 5 DRAFT
Student Drives Fees? High response rate supports parking fees; primarily from bus riders or walker/bike demographic Many comments mimic expert Dr. Shoup as to market- driven principles: Free just promotes unnecessary driving plus predictable concerns for congestion, environment and problems on side streets However Many Student Drives responses posited unfairness to charge fees since no on-site school parking offered (vs. prior to construction) 6 DRAFT
Benefits of Lower Bus and Equivalent Parking Fees: Congestion reduced as more parents and students rely on buses vs. driving Significant improvement in safety with reduction of moving vehicles on/near campuses Relief on nearby residential streets/neighborhoods Major positive impact on energy consumption and pollution (including persistent parent car idling) Increase in available parking for users of Harris Field and HS/MS visitors 7 DRAFT
Recommendations: Lower bus fee from $575 per student to $450 in FY24 Make concerted and continuous communications efforts to encourage walk/bike/roll, as well as to carpool where driving is family s best option Collaborate with student groups to help message and brainstorm on driving issues Review on-site parking situation Fall 2023, once construction vehicles are gone and MS opens (ie, solely staff/faculty activity) Commence discussion re adjustment of FY/25 start times of all levels, to make bus runs commensurate with school sessions Explore parking fees and enforcement with Town/Select Board 8 DRAFT
Other Considerations: Present to Select Board? Public forum to describe program? Leverage Safe Routes To School (SRTS)/Mapping Routes & Loads Promote/Message via: Student Orgs, PTO/PTAs, Principal Newsletters, Parents Groups, FB, Next Door, Belm. Citizens Forum, TAC, Traffic Working Group, Town Meeting Evaluate Year 1 results; adjust for Year 2 (including Start Times) Use experience/results in grant applications Other?? 9 DRAFT
Current Student Parking Zone Approx. 100 spaces reserved for students on Concord Ave (shown in green) 17 DRAFT