Common Pitfalls in Data Management and Organizational Structures

confusing slow irritating unstructured n.w
1 / 18
Embed
Share

Explore the challenges faced in data management, organizational structures, and the concept of the Tragedy of the Commons. Discover the contrast between unreliable, confusing systems and reliable, structured approaches. Navigate through different levels of administrative structures and review the handling of supplementary benefits programs.

  • Data Management
  • Organizational Structures
  • Tragedy of the Commons
  • Common Pitfalls
  • Reliable Systems

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. confusing slow irritating unstructured uncontrolled inconsistent duplication atomized feral versions poorly secured risk prone unmanaged difficult to mysterious growing not waning forgotten overwhelming unknown tacit embarrassing obfuscating muddy

  2. reliable accurate authentic complete

  3. Tragedy of the Commons The tragedy of the commons is a dilemma arising from the situation in which multiple individuals, acting independently and rationally consulting their own self- interest, will ultimately deplete a shared limited resource, even when it is clear that it is not in anyone's long-term interest for this to happen. "The Tragedy of the Commons". Science 162 (3859): 1243 1248. 1968.

  4. Structures

  5. Root Level A1 administration A2 buildings A3 equipment A4 finance A5 HR A6 IT O1 engineering O2 land management O3 procurement X1 reference

  6. Structures folder levels :\A1 administration \committees 200 \00 policy procedure \20 committee files \Name of Committee \executive 280 \00 policy procedure \20 briefings \2016 \2017 \30 correspondence \2017 :\A4 finance \contracts 1070 00\ policy procedure 20\ contract files \current \closed

  7. Structures - poor! \SUPPLEMENT BENEFITS PRG 43000-43040 \Supplementary Benefits Progs General 43000 \00 Policy and_Procedures \General 01 \20 approved AGREEMENTS \Name of Agreement \30 Supplementary Ben Comtts \Name of Committee L1 L2 L3 L3 L3 L4 L3 L4

  8. Structures better \SUPPLEMENT BENEFITS 43000-43040 \43000 general \00 policy and procedures \01 general \20 agreements \Name of agreement \30 committees \Name of committee L1 L2 L3 L3 L3 L4 L3 L4

  9. Structures restricted sections A1 Admin A1 Admin R A2 Buildings A3 Equipment & supplies A4 Finance A4 Finance R A5 HR A5 HR R A6 IT X1 Templates

  10. user needs o better access and retrieval o logical sorting o document identification and content recognition o pattern recognition o tracking versions

  11. rules o elements o abbreviations o succinctness (character limits) o avoid redundancy & minimize repetition o sorting and grouping o title = content

  12. more rules o several specific folders over big broad folders o avoid being too specific - scattering o file paths in footer o standard names for document types (agenda, report) o document and promote!

  13. meaning o retrieval needs of users determine naming conventions o folder names define document content o title, version and date information valuable for finding o author, business unit and type valuable for ownership o order: nothing comes before something o separators: use underscore, dash or space

  14. elements o title - intuitive & concise, consider the sort o version number - V01, V02, V01-01, V02-01, V02-02 o date -use your standard (YYYYMMDD) o author/creator - helpful with versions (pbrown) o business unit / program - can change, be careful o type - agenda (AGD), draft (DFT), report (RPT) etc.

  15. sorting \Admin\Committees\JOSH Committee\CY08\ 2008-04-01 Agenda.doc 2008-04-01 Minutes.doc 2008-07-08 Agenda Draft1.doc 2008-07-08 Minutes Draft1.doc 2008-07-08 Minutes Final.doc \Admin\Committees\JOSH Committee\CY08\ Agenda 2008-04-01.doc Agenda (Draft1) 2008-07-08.doc Minutes 2008-04-01.doc Minutes (Draft1) 2008-07-08.doc Minutes (Final) 2008-07-08.doc

  16. documentation o cheat sheets o templates o manuals o business process o onboarding o review o headers, footers

  17. sources o individual o team o section o branch/divisional o corporate o standards o professional o convention o future

  18. Long-term Monitoring Case Files Title format: 32220 25/ SA / Type / Location / Project Name / Categories Where SA = Service Area (01 28) Type = Instrumentation (IN) or Horizontal Drains (HD)) Location = Hwy # or Road Name and/or Road Name & Road Number (Hwy 12 or Coalmont Road 83) Project Name = Charlie s Slough Example 32220 25/ Service Area 19 / Slope Stability / Hwy 16 / Slim Creek Hill / *add a category* Notes Field format Mandatory: UTM coordinates consisting of a NAD 83, Zone (i.e. 09, 10, 11), northing and easting or coordinate pair (start and end point): Example NAD 83 Zone 09 N1234567 E123456

More Related Content