
Develop Appeals Process for Addressing Unsatisfactory Ratings in Compliance with Public Act 101-0591
Learn about the requirement under Public Act 101-0591 for school districts to establish an appeals process for dealing with unsatisfactory ratings, including the involvement of qualified evaluators and bargaining with teachers' representatives. This process is aimed at ensuring fairness and accuracy in rating assessments.
Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Unsatisfactory Evaluations DEVELOPING AN APPEALS PROCESS IN ACCORDANCE WITH PUBLIC ACT 101-0591
The law: 105 ILCS 5/24A-5.5 Local appeal process for unsatisfactory ratings. Beginning with the first school year following the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 101st General Assembly, each school district shall, in good faith cooperation with its teachers or, if applicable, through good faith bargaining with the exclusive bargaining representative of its teachers, develop and implement an appeals process for unsatisfactory ratings under Section 24A-5 that includes, but is not limited to, an assessment of the original rating by a panel of qualified evaluators agreed to by the joint committee referred to in subsection (b) of Section 24A-4 that has the power to revoke the unsatisfactory rating it deems to be erroneous. The joint committee shall determine the criteria for successful appeals; however, the issuance of a rating to replace an unsatisfactory rating must be determined through bargaining between the exclusive bargaining representative, if any, and the school district.
The law: 105 ILCS 5/24A-5.5 Local appeal process for unsatisfactory ratings. Beginning with the first school year following the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 101st General Assembly, each school district shall, in good faith cooperation with its teachers or, if applicable, through good faith bargaining with the exclusive bargaining representative of its teachers, develop and implement an appeals process for unsatisfactory ratings under Section 24A-5 that includes, but is not limited to, an assessment of the original rating by a panel of qualified evaluators agreed to by the joint committee referred to in subsection (b) of Section 24A-4 that has the power to revoke the unsatisfactory rating it deems to be erroneous. The joint committee shall determine the criteria for successful appeals; however, the issuance of a rating to replace an unsatisfactory rating must be determined through bargaining between the exclusive bargaining representative, if any, and the school district.
The law: 105 ILCS 5/24A-5.5 Local appeal process for unsatisfactory ratings. Beginning with the first school year following the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 101st General Assembly, each school district shall, in good faith cooperation with its teachers or, if applicable, through good faith bargaining with the exclusive bargaining representative of its teachers, develop and implement an appeals process for unsatisfactory ratings under Section 24A-5 that includes, but is not limited to, an assessment of the original rating by a panel of qualified evaluators agreed to by the joint committee referred to in subsection (b) of Section 24A-4 that has the power to revoke the unsatisfactory rating it deems to be erroneous. The joint committee shall determine the criteria for successful appeals; however, the issuance of a rating to replace an unsatisfactory rating must be determined through bargaining between the exclusive bargaining representative, if any, and the school district.
The law: 105 ILCS 5/24A-5.5 Local appeal process for unsatisfactory ratings. Beginning with the first school year following the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 101st General Assembly, each school district shall, in good faith cooperation with its teachers or, if applicable, through good faith bargaining with the exclusive bargaining representative of its teachers, develop and implement an appeals process for unsatisfactory ratings under Section 24A-5 that includes, but is not limited to, an assessment of the original rating by a panel of qualified evaluators agreed to by the joint committee referred to in subsection (b) of Section 24A-4 that has the power to revoke the unsatisfactory rating it deems to be erroneous. The joint committee shall determine the criteria for successful appeals; however, the issuance of a rating to replace an unsatisfactory rating must be determined through bargaining between the exclusive bargaining representative, if any, and the school district.
The law: 105 ILCS 5/24A-5.5 Local appeal process for unsatisfactory ratings. Beginning with the first school year following the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 101st General Assembly, each school district shall, in good faith cooperation with its teachers or, if applicable, through good faith bargaining with the exclusive bargaining representative of its teachers, develop and implement an appeals process for unsatisfactory ratings under Section 24A-5 that includes, but is not limited to, an assessment of the original rating by a panel of qualified evaluators agreed to by the joint committee referred to in subsection (b) of Section 24A-4 that has the power to revoke the unsatisfactory rating it deems to be erroneous. The joint committee shall determine the criteria for successful appeals; however, the issuance of a rating to replace an unsatisfactory rating must be determined through bargaining between the exclusive bargaining representative, if any, and the school district.
The law: 105 ILCS 5/24A-5.5 Local appeal process for unsatisfactory ratings. Beginning with the first school year following the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 101st General Assembly, each school district shall, in good faith cooperation with its teachers or, if applicable, through good faith bargaining with the exclusive bargaining representative of its teachers, develop and implement an appeals process for unsatisfactory ratings under Section 24A-5 that includes, but is not limited to, an assessment of the original rating by a panel of qualified evaluators agreed to by the joint committee referred to in subsection (b) of Section 24A-4 that has the power to revoke the unsatisfactory rating it deems to be erroneous. The joint committee shall determine the criteria for successful appeals; however, the issuance of a rating to replace an unsatisfactory rating must be determined through bargaining between the exclusive bargaining representative, if any, and the school district.
The law: 105 ILCS 5/24A-5.5 Local appeal process for unsatisfactory ratings. Beginning with the first school year following the effective date of this amendatory Act of the 101st General Assembly, each school district shall, in good faith cooperation with its teachers or, if applicable, through good faith bargaining with the exclusive bargaining representative of its teachers, develop and implement an appeals process for unsatisfactory ratings under Section 24A-5 that includes, but is not limited to, an assessment of the original rating by a panel of qualified evaluators agreed to by the joint committee referred to in subsection (b) of Section 24A-4 that has the power to revoke the unsatisfactory rating it deems to be erroneous. The joint committee shall determine the criteria for successful appeals; however, the issuance of a rating to replace an unsatisfactory rating must be determined through bargaining between the exclusive bargaining representative, if any, and the school district.
Recommended Criteria in Appeals Process: Bargained with the Union but not necessarily AGREED SMALL panel of qualified evaluators recommend 2 Assessment of the original rating - Review evaluation - Review written appeal - Review written response from original evaluator - Review any other documents and interview any witnesses as panelists see fit Criteria for determining successful appeals both panelists agree based upon information submitted and reviewed If unsatisfactory evaluation overturned, panelists agree on new rating New rating shared with union and subject to bargaining not AGREEMENT
Sample Appeals Process: APPEALS PROCESS An appeal process is hereby established for teachers for the purpose of appealing an unsatisfactory rating received under Section 24A-5 of the Illinois School Code (105 ILCS 5/24A-5) by a qualified evaluator. This process is established pursuant to and in accordance with Section 24A-5.5 of the Illinois School Code (105 ILCS 5/24A-5.5). An appeal filed in accordance with the procedures established herein shall be reviewed by a panel of two qualified evaluators chosen by the Superintendent whom did not conduct the original evaluation of the teacher filing the appeal. A teacher desiring to appeal an unsatisfactory rating shall file a notice of appeal with the Superintendent within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of the unsatisfactory rating. The notice of appeal shall state the factual basis for the appeal and include any relevant documents in support of the appeal. An appeal may be based on student growth ratings only if the appealing teacher identifies a valid data error.
Sample Appeals Process: APPEALS PROCESS (cont) Upon receipt of a notice of appeal, the panel shall determine whether the unsatisfactory rating was erroneous based upon a review of the written record of said rating, including, but not limited to, (1) the information and documents provided by the teacher in his or her notice of appeal, and (2) the original evaluator s written observations, comments and feedback. In the event, the panel determines the written record is insufficient to make a determination, it may schedule a meeting with the appealing teacher, original evaluator, or review other evidence or interview other witnesses as it sees fit. Additionally, the panel may schedule an observation of the appealing teacher to aid in its determination. After a review of the written record of the unsatisfactory rating, any interview the teacher or evaluator, and any observation of the teacher, the panel shall overturn the unsatisfactory rating if the following criteria are met:
Sample Appeals Process: APPEALS PROCESS (cont) The notice of appeal was filed with the Superintendent within ten (10) calendar days after receipt of the unsatisfactory rating ; The notice of appeal contains a sufficient factual basis for the appeal; and The panel unanimously determines the unsatisfactory rating was erroneous. In such event, the panel shall determine the proposed evaluation rating which shall then be shared with the exclusive bargaining representative of the teachers. Upon review of the proposed evaluation rating, the exclusive bargaining representative may demand to bargain the evaluation rating. In such event, a District representative shall meet with the exclusive bargaining representative to bargain the rating. In absence of an agreement, the proposed evaluation rating determined by the appeal panel shall stand.