
Economic Dispatch and Optimal Power Flow Analysis in Power Systems
Explore economic dispatch and optimal power flow concepts in power system analysis through lectures, examples, and solution methods. Understand the mathematical formulations and iterative algorithms involved in achieving efficient power generation and utilization for cost optimization.
Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
ECE 476 Power System Analysis Lecture 16: Economic Dispatch, Optimal Power Flow Prof. Tom Overbye Dept. of Electrical and Computer Engineering University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign overbye@illinois.edu
Announcements Chapter 12.4 and 12.5, Chapter 7 HW 7 is due now HW 8 is 12.19, 12.20, 12.26, 12.28; due October 29 in class (no quiz) 1
Economic Dispatch Lagrangian For the economic dispatch we have a minimization constrained with a single equality constraint m m , ) = + P L( ( ) ( ) (no losses) C P P P G i Gi D Gi = = 1 1 i i The necessary conditions for a minimum are L( , ) dC P dP P ( ) P G i Gi = = = 0 (for i 1 to m) Gi m Gi = 0 P P D Gi = 1 i 2
Economic Dispatch Example What is economic dispatch for a two generator system P G G P P C P P = + = + = 500 MW and D 1 2 2 + ( ) 1000 20 0.01 $/ P hr 1 1 1 1 G G G 2 = + + ( ) 400 15 0.03 $/ C P P P hr 2 2 2 2 G G G Using the Largrange multiplier method we know ( ) 20 G dP ( ) 15 G dP P P = dC P 1 1 G = + = 0 .02 0 P 1 G 1 dC P 2 2 G = + = 0.06 0 P 2 G 2 500 0 1 2 G G 3
Economic Dispatch Example, contd We therefore need to solve three linear equations 20 0.02 15 0.06 500 0 0.02 0 1 0 0.06 1 1 1 312.5 MW 187.5 MW 26.2 $/MWh + + = = 0 0 P P 1 G 2 P G = P 1 2 G G 20 15 500 P P 1 G = 2 G P P = 1 G 2 G 4
Lambda-Iteration Solution Method The direct solution only works well if the incremental cost curves are linear and no generators are at their limits A more general method is known as the lambda- iteration the method requires that there be a unique mapping between a value of lambda and each generator s MW output the method then starts with values of lambda below and above the optimal value, and then iteratively brackets the optimal value 5
Lambda-Iteration Algorithm L H Pick and such that m m L H P ( ) 0 P ( ) 0 P P Gi Gi D D i=1 i=1 H L Do While M H L = + ( )/2 m M H M = If P ( ) 0 Then P Gi D i=1 L M = Else End While 6
Lambda-Iteration: Graphical View In the graph shown below for each value of lambda there is a unique PGi for each generator. This relationship is the PGi( ) function. 7
Lambda-Iteration Example Consider a three generator system with ( ) 15 ( ) 20 ( ) 18 and with constraint Rewriting as a function of , P ( ), we have 15 P ( ) 0.02 18 P ( ) 0.025 = = = + + + = = = 0.02 0.01 0.025 P $/MWh $/MWh $/MWh 1000MW IC P IC P IC P P P 1 1 1 G G 2 2 2 G G P P 3 3 3 G G + + = P 1 2 3 G G G Gi 20 = = P ( ) G1 G2 0.01 = G3 8
Lambda-Iteration Example, contd m L L ) 1000 Pick so P ( 0 and Gi i=1 m H ) 1000 P ( 0 Gi i=1 m L = (20) 1000 = Try 20 then P Gi = 1 i 15 20 18 + + = 1000 670 MW 0.02 0.01 0.025 m P = H = (30) 1000 = Try 30 then 1230 MW Gi 1 i 9
Lambda-Iteration Example, contd = Pick convergence tolerance 0.05 $/MWh H L Then iterate since 0.05 M H L = + = ( )/2 25 m H (25) 1000 = = Then since 280 we set 25 P Gi = 1 0.05 i Since 25 20 M = + = (25 20)/2 22.5 m L (22.5) 1000 195 we set = = 2 2.5 P Gi = 1 i 10
Lambda-Iteration Example, contd H L Continue iterating until 0.05 * The solution value of , , is 23.53 $/MWh * Once is known we can calculate the P 23.53 15 P (23.5) 0.02 23.53 20 P (23.5) 0.01 23.53 18 P (23.5) 0.025 Gi = = 426 MW G1 = = 353 MW G2 = = 221 MW G3 11
Generator MW Limits Generators have limits on the minimum and maximum amount of power they can produce Often times the minimum limit is not zero. This represents a limit on the generator s operation with the desired fuel type Because of varying system economics usually many generators in a system are operated at their maximum MW limits. 12
Lambda-Iteration with Gen Limits In the lambda-iteration method the limits are taken into account when calculating P ( ): if P ( ) then P ( ) Gi P P = = Gi P Gi ,max Gi ,max Gi if P ( ) then P ( ) P Gi ,min Gi ,min Gi Gi 13
Lambda-Iteration Gen Limit Example In the previous three generator example assume the same cost characteristics but also with limits 0 P 300 MW 200 P 600 MW With limits we get 100 P 500 MW G1 G2 G3 m (20) 1000 = + + (20) 100 (20) (20) 0 P P P P 1 2 3 Gi G G G = 1 i = 250 100 + + 450 MW (compared to -670MW) = 200 m (30) 1000 = + + 480 1000 = 300 500 280 MW P Gi = 1 i 14
Lambda-Iteration Limit Example,contd Again we continue iterating until the convergence condition is satisfied. With limits the final solution of , is 24.43 $/MWh (compared to 23.53 $/MWh without limits). The presence of limits will alwa cause to either increase or remain the same. Final solution is P (24.43) 300 MW P (24.43) 443 MW P (24.43) 257 MW = ys = = G1 G2 G3 15
Back of Envelope Values Often times incremental costs can be approximated by a constant value: $/MWhr = fuelcost * heatrate + variable O&M Typical heatrate for a coal plant is 10, modern combustion turbine is 10, combined cycle plant is 7 to 8, older combustion turbine 15. Fuel costs ($/MBtu) are quite variable, with current values around 1.5 for coal, 4 for natural gas, 0.5 for nuclear, probably 10 for fuel oil. Hydro, solar and wind costs tend to be quite low, but for this sources the fuel is free but limited 16
Inclusion of Transmission Losses The losses on the transmission system are a function of the generation dispatch. In general, using generators closer to the load results in lower losses This impact on losses should be included when doing the economic dispatch Losses can be included by slightly rewriting the Lagrangian: m C P = m = + + P L( , ) ( ) ( ( ) ) P P P P G i Gi D L G Gi = 1 1 i i 17
Impact of Transmission Losses This small change then impacts the necessary conditions for an optimal economic dispatch m m , ) = + + P L( ( ) ( ( ) ) C P P P P P G i Gi D L G Gi = = 1 1 i i The necessary conditions for a minimum are now L( , ) ( i dC P P d Gi m P P P P = P ) ( ) P P P G Gi L G = = (1 ) 0 P Gi Gi + = ( ) 0 D L G Gi 1 i 18
Impact of Transmission Losses Solving each equation for we get ( ) (1 Gi dP ( ) dC P P P P i Gi L G = 0 Gi dC P dP ( ) 1 i Gi = ( ) P P P Gi L G 1 Gi th Define the penalty factor L for the i generator 1 L ( ) 1 Gi P i The penalty factor at the slack bus is always unity! = i P P L G 19
Impact of Transmission Losses The condition for optimal dispatch with losses is then ( ) ( 1 Since L ( ) 1 Gi P P P P i appear to be more expensive (i.e., it is penalized). Likewise L appear less expensive. = = = ) ( ) L IC P L IC P L IC Gm P 1 1 1 2 2 2 G G m m = if increasing P increases i Gi P P L G ( ) L G the losses then 0 1.0 L i Gi This makes generator 1.0 makes a generator i 20
Calculation of Penalty Factors Unfortunately, the analytic calculation of L is somewhat involved. The problem is a small change in the generation at P impacts the flows and hence the losses throughout the entire system. However, using a power flow you can approximate this function by making a small change to P and then seeing how the losses change: ( ) ( ) L G L G P P P P P P i Gi Gi 1 P P P L i ( ) L G 1 Gi Gi Gi 21
Two Bus Penalty Factor Example P P ( ) ( ) 0.37 10 P P P L MW MW L P = G L G 0.0387 = = = 0.037 2 0.9627 G Gi 0.9643 L 2 2 22
Thirty Bus ED Example Case is economically dispatched without considering the incremental impact of the system losses 23
Thirty Bus ED Example, cont Because of the penalty factors the generator incremental costs are no longer identical. 24
Area Supply Curve The area supply curve shows the cost to produce the next MW of electricity, assuming area is economically dispatched 10.00 7.50 Supply curve for thirty bus system 5.00 2.50 0.00 0 100 200 300 400 Total Area Generation (MW) 25
Economic Dispatch - Summary Economic dispatch determines the best way to minimize the current generator operating costs The lambda-iteration method is a good approach for solving the economic dispatch problem generator limits are easily handled penalty factors are used to consider the impact of losses Economic dispatch is not concerned with determining which units to turn on/off (this is the unit commitment problem) Economic dispatch ignores the transmission system limitations 26
Optimal Power Flow The goal of an optimal power flow (OPF) is to determine the best way to instantaneously operate a power system. Usually best = minimizing operating cost. OPF considers the impact of the transmission system OPF is used as basis for real-time pricing in major US electricity markets such as MISO and PJM. ECE 476 introduces the OPF problem and provides some demonstrations. 27
Electricity Markets Over last fifteen years electricity markets have moved from bilateral contracts between utilities to also include spot markets (day ahead and real- time). Electricity (MWh) is now being treated as a commodity (like corn, coffee, natural gas) with the size of the market transmission system dependent. Tools of commodity trading are being widely adopted (options, forwards, hedges, swaps). 28
Electricity Futures Example Source: Wall Street Journal Online, 10/21/2015 29
Historical Variation in Oct 2015 Price Price has dropped, following the drop in natural gas prices Source: Wall Street Journal Online, 10/21/2015
Ideal Power Market Ideal power market is analogous to a lake. Generators supply energy to lake and loads remove energy. Ideal power market has no transmission constraints Single marginal cost associated with enforcing constraint that supply = demand buy from the least cost unit that is not at a limit this price is the marginal cost This solution is identical to the economic dispatch problem solution 31
Two Bus Economic Dispatch Example Total Hourly Cost : Area Lambda : 13.02 8459 $/hr Bus A Bus B 300.0 MW MW 300.0 MW MW 199.6 MW AGC ON MW 400.4 MW AGC ON MW 32
Market Marginal (Incremental) Cost Below are some graphs associated with this two bus system. The graph on left shows the marginal cost for each of the generators. The graph on the right shows the system supply curve, assuming the system is optimally dispatched. 16.00 16.00 15.00 15.00 14.00 14.00 13.00 13.00 12.00 12.00 0 175 350 525 700 0 350 700 1050 1400 Generator Power (MW) Total Area Generation (MW) Current generator operating point 33
Real Power Markets Different operating regions impose constraints -- total demand in region must equal total supply Transmission system imposes constraints on the market Marginal costs become localized Requires solution by an optimal power flow 34
Optimal Power Flow (OPF) OPF functionally combines the power flow with economic dispatch Minimize cost function, such as operating cost, taking into account realistic equality and inequality constraints Equality constraints bus real and reactive power balance generator voltage setpoints area MW interchange 35
OPF, contd Inequality constraints transmission line/transformer/interface flow limits generator MW limits generator reactive power capability curves bus voltage magnitudes (not yet implemented in Simulator OPF) Available Controls generator MW outputs transformer taps and phase angles 36