Explore the concept of benchlearning - a blend of benchmarking and mutual learning - to enhance organizational performance. Learn the main principles and a proposed 3-step method for successful implementation, emphasizing adaptability to regional needs and priorities.
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Topic: Evaluation and Benchlearning : benchlearning Prepared by: Aix-Marseille University Authors : Ariel Mendez, Francesca Petrella, Nadine Richez-Battesti Date: February 2020
Rationale Benchlearning : both benchmarking (assessment) and mutual learning Three central questions : Why transfer ? What to transfer ? How to transfer ? Main principles Not a top/down process but a participative one Benchlearning is a highly contextualised process : need coherence with the cultural, social and institutional context and with regional needs and priorities Relevance/compatibility/feasibility for the organization
A proposition of method : 3 steps Identify Presentation of the results of the study module: synthesis realised by the partner - 30 minutes Identify needs and priorities at the regional level: discussion in small working groups (max 8-10 persons). Each group prepares a proposal of priorities - 30 minutes Analyse and learn Discussion of the proposals with the large group : what are the regional priorities? how the foreign experiences could be a source of inspiration or even provide some options of responses; what are the opportunities and the risks? 45 minutes. Summarise what we have learned: what are our priorities and what are the potential responses or sources of inspiration for our territory? 15 minutes Develop suggestions Discussion within small working groups about what could be experimented in our region during the testing phase. Discussion includes concerns about the implementation and feasibility processes. Each group crafts a proposal 1 hour Exchange with the large group of all the suggestions and decide which ones could be explored 1 hour Create a small group of volunteers who would like to prepare the experimentation phase. Cf. One example of method for organising the discussion : a process of consent decision making (see next slide)
