Effective Project Execution and Presentation
Every project should have a definite aim, clearly stated and recognized as a real problem. Solutions must be experimentally tested. Data collection, analysis, and interpretation must be shown with clarity. Suggestions for improvements and alternative methods should be included, while conclusions, positive or negative, must be clearly stated. Originality, depth of exploration, and understanding of fundamental theories should be evaluated. The logical flow, scientific language correctness, and clarity of ideas are essential. Use of appropriate illustrations, well-labelled references, and skillful use of local materials are crucial elements in a project.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
31 31st stmarch, 2017 march, 2017
Every Every project should have a definite aim such project should have a definite aim such as finding a solution to an as finding a solution to an existing problem. existing problem. The The problem must be clearly stated and problem must be clearly stated and recognised as a recognised as a real problem real problem. . Each possible solution must be Each possible solution must be experimentally tested tested experimentally
Collection of data, its analysis and Collection of data, its analysis and interpretation must be clearly shown interpretation must be clearly shown including graphs, tables photographs including graphs, tables photographs etc. etc. Data and results should be illustrated whenever possible Reference to boos and specialists must be clearly shown or stated
He/she should be able to suggest possible improvement or alternative methods Conclusions or findings either positive or negative should be clearly stated including control experiments.
Is the subject the students own idea? Did the pupil raise original questions and were they explore? Has the subject been probed to a greater depth? Is the subject the students own idea? Did the pupil raise original questions and were they explore? Has the subject been probed to a greater depth?
Has the used student understood the fundamental theory of the subject? Has the student mastered the techniques and skills? Has the used student understood the fundamental theory of the subject? Has the student mastered the techniques and skills? Does the work follow a logical order? Has the scientific language been correct? Are the ideas clearly expressed? Does the work follow a logical order? Has the scientific language been correct? Are the ideas clearly expressed?
Are the illustrations appropriately chosen and well labelled? Have the references or bibliography correctly quoted? Has the pupil used local materials or locally available material skillfully? Are the illustrations appropriately chosen and well labelled? Have the references or bibliography correctly quoted? Has the pupil used local materials or locally available material skillfully?
We judge the quality of the work done in a project and how well the pupil has explored the area in which he had been working. We judge a project in the light of laboratory, field or theoretical work.
We judge a pupils work not that of a PHD candidate ( sometimes judges tend to over react by giving far more credit than they deserve or acting as though the work done by the pupil was worthless because it was not up to professional or international standard. This must be avoided)
1. ON THE PROJECT credit 1. ON THE PROJECT credit should be given to should be given to: :- - originality of the idea research work presentation( layout, labelling, workmanship
clever use of simple materials clever use of simple materials how well a scientific principle has been clearly illustrated how well a scientific principle has been clearly illustrated sustainability of the idea/project sustainability of the idea/project
Credit the tact ( ability in explaining, demonstrating and answering The language and style of expression Timing of the oral presentation Ability to explain and answer questions Credit should be given to the knowledge, tact ( insight ability in explaining, demonstrating and answering questions The language and style of expression Timing of the oral presentation Ability to explain and answer questions should be given to : :- - knowledge, insight) ) questions
End of presentation End of presentation
