Effects of QM Reviews on Courses at UWF

Download Presenatation
Effects of QM Reviews on Courses at UWF
Slide Note
Embed
Share

"Explore the impact of Quality Matters (QM) reviews on three courses at the University of West Florida (UWF), analyzing changes in grades, completion rates, and learner satisfaction. Delve into the strategic implementation, analysis, and hypothesis of course redesign, supported by methodology and presentation objectives."

  • QM Reviews
  • UWF
  • Course Impact
  • Grades
  • Learner Satisfaction

Uploaded on Apr 12, 2025 | 2 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HAPPY TRAILS: EFFECTS OF QM REVIEWS OF 3 COURSES AT UWF

  2. SARA MCCOOL JUNE WATKINS University of West Florida Faculty for 16 years Instructional Designer Certified QM Online Facilitator 2 courses reviewed University of West Florida Instructional Designer Online Faculty for 9 years

  3. PRESENTATION OBJECTIVES Discuss the results of a research study conducted at the University of West Florida involving 3 reviewed courses. Discuss the effects of 3 QM reviews on grades, course completion rates, and learner satisfaction Review the changes that were made resulting in clear alignment, easy navigation and excellent course/module objectives.

  4. BACKGROUND Quality Matters since 2010. Grew out of concern about online quality. Incentives for faculty.

  5. STRATEGIC PLAN Implementation Train Reviewers Faculty buy in Analysis Track reviewed courses Analyze results Refine and Revise QM Fun Reviews Rinse and Repeat

  6. IMPLEMENTATION WHERE WE VE BEEN

  7. IMPLEMENTATION Reluctant faculty Developed Training Program Offered Template Decided on Incentives Trained Reviewers Review process

  8. ANALYSIS WHERE WE ARE NOW

  9. HYPOTHESIS A re-designed course will have a positive effect on grades, completion rates and student satisfaction.

  10. METHODOLOGY Chose 3 courses randomly 3 sections before the review 3 sections after the review Measured: Grades Withdrawals Muddiest Point Discussion Threads

  11. ANALYSIS NUR 4165 Reviewed 05-15-2015 95 points. The major issues in this course were too many course and module level objectives (alignment was off) The instructor simplified and aligned all objectives Too few formative activities instructor added rubrics and videos

  12. ANALYSIS NUR 4165 Average Grade 97 96 95 94 93 92 91 90 89 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

  13. ANALYSIS NUR 4165 Average Student Satisfaction 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

  14. ANALYSIS Average Withdrawals 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

  15. SUMMARY NUR 4165 Grades Increased Questions on the Muddiest Point Forum Decreased= Student Satisfaction Increased Withdrawals Decreased Instructor reports emails also decreased dramatically, saving her time and frustration.

  16. ANALYSIS Teaching A Quality Online Course Reviewed 01-31-2014 99 points Biggest improvement in the course was in added formative activities and cleaner alignment.

  17. WITHDRAWAL RATES

  18. NUMBER OF MUDDIEST POINT THREADS Student satisfaction 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

  19. SUMMARY ATC 102 Grades remained the same due to the nature of the course Withdrawals decreased Number of Muddiest Point Thread decreased = Student Satisfaction Increased

  20. ANALYSIS HSA 4340 Reviewed in January 2015 Major issues involved alignment, clear course objectives, and a new Begin Here section.

  21. WITHDRAWALS Withdrew 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

  22. MUDDIEST POINT THREADS

  23. AVERAGE GRADES Average Grade 3.1 3 2.9 2.8 2.7 2.6 2.5 2.4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

  24. REFINE AND REVISE WHERE WE ARE GOING

  25. CHANGES AT THE STATE LEVEL Need to step up pace Administration support Pressure from the state QM Fundamentals Quick Review Deadline looming

  26. SUMMARY

  27. Happy Learners

More Related Content