Employee Data Presentation for the Faculty Senate

Employee Data Presentation for the Faculty Senate
Slide Note
Embed
Share

This presentation explores the university's spending patterns on different functions such as Instruction, Research, Public Service, and more. It delves into data from various sources like IPEDS and AFT to analyze the allocation of funds and potential areas for improvement.

  • University
  • Spending
  • Data Analysis
  • Faculty Senate
  • Presentation

Uploaded on Mar 04, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Employee Data Presentation for the Faculty Senate

  2. Death by a Thousand Cuts Arguments The university is spending too much on Institutional Support and not spending enough on Instruction, Research, and Public Service. The university is not supporting the hiring of Tenure and Tenure Track Faculty Data taken from the IPEDS database (taken from AFT website) Great tool to look up data and make institution to institution comparisons However, you have to understand the various IPEDS surveys (e.g., what is being reported, changes in reporting that take place, etc.) to correctly use the data

  3. UMKC % Change in Spending per FTE by Function AY03 - AY12 100% 91% 80% 60% Instruction 51% Research 40% Public Service % Change 29% Academic Support 25% Student Services 20% 15% Institutional Support Operation Maint. Of Plant 7% Auxilliary Enterprises 0% AY03 AY04 AY05 AY06 AY07 AY08 AY09 AY10 AY11 AY12 -13% -20% -40% Year

  4. AFT Data Data taken from http://highereddata.aft.org AFT is using the total expenses for each function (e.g., Instruction). This data comes from the IPEDS Finance survey. AFT has calculated a student FTE by taking the total full-time enrollment and adding it to one-third of the part time enrollment.

  5. AFT Data Problems AFT is using the student FTE from the following fall term rather than the fall term related to the academic year the expenditures are for. IPEDS Finance Survey changes In AY03 the functions (e.g., Institutional Support) on the IPEDS Finance survey did not include Operation Maintenance of Plant, Depreciation, or Interest. These aspects were separated out as distinct functions. In AY08 and AY09 changes were made to the Finance survey, and since this time the Operation Maintenance of Plant, Depreciation, and Interest have been divided among the different functions. Thus, a comparison of the Total Expenses for each function without taking these aspects out artificially inflates the total for Academic Years 2009 and on. Each function includes three major aspects: Salaries and Wages Fringe Benefits All Other (ex. Supplies and equipment) Over half of the growth in the Institutional Support function is attributable to the All Other area. Since the central argument appears to surround salaries and benefits, it makes sense to look at the change in spending per FTE by function for Salaries and Benefits only.

  6. UMKC % Change in Spending per FTE by Function (Salaries & Benefits Only) AY03 - AY12 70% 60% 60% 50% 41% 40% Instruction 30% Research 27% Public Service % Change Academic Support 20% 16% Student Services Institutional Support 10% Operation Maint Auxilliary Enterprises 0% -1% -4% AY03 AY04 AY05 AY06 AY07 AY08 AY09 AY10 AY11 AY12 -10% -12% -18% -20% -30% Year

  7. Salaries and Benefits When you correct the data and look at Salaries and Benefits only, a very different picture emerges. The change in spending per FTE for Institutional Support between AY-03 and AY12 goes down to 27%. In comparison, the change in spending per FTE for Instruction between AY-03 and AY12 was 16%. Salaries and Benefits for Instruction grew $41,452,962 from AY03 to AY12. Salaries for Institutional Support, which includes important functions such as Police, Human Resources, and IT, grew $7,682,337.

  8. Percentage of Expenditures The percent of the Total Expenditures attributable to Institutional Support has remained relatively flat for the past 10 years This is especially true when you focus on Salaries and Benefits only AY03 = 8.1% AY12 = 8.9% Similarly, the percent of the Total Expenditures attributable to Instruction and to Academic Support have remained relatively flat for the past 10 years This is especially true when you focus on Salaries and Benefits only AY03 = 56.8% and 8.0%, respectively AY12 = 57.0% and 9.8%, respectively

  9. Percent of Expenditures Attributed to Instruction, Academic Support and to Institutional Support (Salaries and Benefits only) AY03 - AY12 70.0% 57.0% 60.0% 56.8% 56.8% 56.6% 55.7% 55.6% 55.4% 55.1% 54.9% 52.8% 50.0% 40.0% 30.0% 20.0% 9.8% 9.6% 9.6% 9.6% 9.6% 9.4% 9.1% 8.9% 8.0% 7.9% 10.0% 10.1% 9.4% 9.4% 9.1% 9.0% 8.9% 8.5% 8.5% 8.4% 8.1% 0.0% AY03 AY04 AY05 AY06 AY07 AY08 AY09 AY10 AY11 AY12 Instruction Academic Support Institutional Support

  10. Employee Headcount Data Factors to consider: Graphs exclude years (Fall 2006, Fall 2008, and Fall 2010) Graphs include the Medical School (in IPEDS, the Medical School is reported separately) Depending on the year reported, the Medical School numbers could include Resident Physicians as Tenure/Tenure Track faculty It is important to note that Executive/Managerial positions include both academic and non-academic positions

  11. UMKC Tenured and Tenure Track Faculty 510 499 500 490 480 469 466 470 Faculty 460 450 450 445 440 430 420 410 Fall 2005 Fall 2007 Fall 2009 Fall 2011 Fall 2012 Source: IPEDS Data, Higher Education Data Center highereddata.aft.org

  12. Full-time Faculty Under Instruction/Research/Public Service (Med. Included) 576 499 469 466 464 462 450 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 T/TT

  13. Full-time Faculty Under Instruction/Research/Public Service (Med. Excluded) 448 445 444 440 430 425 420 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 T/TT

  14. UMKC Tenured and Tenure Track Faculty 400 344 336 334 350 304 301 300 Tenured 250 On tenure track 198 Faculty 200 165 132 150 114 101 100 50 Source: IPEDS Data, Higher Education Data Center 0 Fall 2005 Fall 2007 Fall 2009 Fall 2011 Fall 2012

  15. Full-time Faculty Under Instruction/Research/Public Service (Med. Included) 344 336 334 316 304 304 301 272 198 165 146 132 120 114 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Tenured On Track

  16. Full-time Faculty Under Instruction/Research/Public Service (Med. Excluded) 328 323 322 309 296 295 294 150 139 129 126 121 112 108 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Tenured On Track

  17. UMKC Instructional Staff by Classification Fall 05 - Fall 12 900 800 Data for Fall 2012 not comparable with prior years due to changes in classification. 700 665 Full-time tenure/on track Faculty 635 600 543 499 500 Full-time non- tenure track Faculty Faculty 456 445 400 Part-time/Adjunct Faculty 300 276 200 Graduate Assistants 100 Source: IPEDS Data, Higher Education Data Center highereddata.aft.org 0 Fall 2005 Fall 2007 Fall 2009 Fall 2011 Fall 2012

  18. Total Faculty Under Instruction/Research/Public Service (Med. Included) 840 665 635 579 548 499 456 450 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Full-time Tenure/On Track Faculty Full-time Non-Tenure Track Faculty Part-time Faculty Graduate Assistants

  19. Total Faculty Under Instruction/Research/Public Service (Med. Excluded) 637 555 548 434 456 420 430 362 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09 2009-10 2010-11 2011-12 Full-time Tenure/On Track Faculty Full-time Non-Tenure Track Faculty Part-time Faculty Graduate Assistants

  20. Executive/Managerial Units Included: Chancellor Diversity Intercollegiate Athletics Public Communication Research Academic Affairs Administration & Finance University Advancement Student Affairs Academic Units Titles Included: Chancellor (incl. Deputy, Vice, Assoc. & Ast.) Provost (incl. Deputy, Vice, Assoc. & Ast. Dean (incl. Assoc. & Ast.) Director (incl. Assoc. & Ast.) Program Director Manager Program Manager Head Coach (incl. Assoc. & Ast.) Supervisor Coordinator

  21. Hiring Trends Using EEO codes (as done for IPEDS) EEO Code 101 and 102 = Executive/Managerial EEO Code 201 = Tenure/Tenure Track Faculty Looking at Census dates New Hire = Someone who was here as of Census who wasn t here in the previous Census Lost = Someone who was no longer in the Census file that was in the previous Census File Net gain or loss is the difference between the number of new hires and the number of employees lost

  22. Number of New Employees Hired Since Previous Census 41 33 31 24 24 23 23 22 19 19 22 19 18 12 15 10 Census 2007 Census 2008 Census 2009 Census 2010 Census 2011 Census 2012 Census 2013 Census 2014 Exec/Admin T/TT

  23. Net Gain or Loss of Job Positions 35 23 25 13 15 11 8 6 5 4 5 -1 -1 -2 -2 2 -7 -7 -5 -5 -18 -15 -25 -35 Census 2007 Census 2008 Census 2009 Census 2010 Census 2011 Census 2012 Census 2013 Census 2014 Exec/Admin T/TT

  24. Number of New Employees Hired Since Previous Census (Positions with Chancellor/Provost in Title Only) 41 33 31 22 19 19 15 12 5 4 4 3 2 2 2 1 Census 2007 Census 2008 Census 2009 Census 2010 Census 2011 Census 2012 Census 2013 Census 2014 Exec/Admin T/TT

  25. Net Gain or Loss of Job Positions (Positions with Chancellor/Provost in Title Only) 35 23 25 13 15 11 6 2 2 1 5 1 -1 -1 -2 -3 -1 -1 -5 -2 -2 -15 -25 -35 Census 2007 Census 2008 Census 2009 Census 2010 Census 2011 Census 2012 Census 2013 Census 2014 Exec/Admin T/TT

  26. New Hires (A&S Faculty Only) 18 14 13 12 6 5 2 0 Census 2007 Census 2008 Census 2009 Census 2010 Census 2011 Census 2012 Census 2013 Census 2014

  27. Net Gain or Loss of Job Positions (A&S Faculty Only) 8 8 5 4 -1 -1 -1 -2 Census 2007 Census 2008 Census 2009 Census 2010 Census 2011 Census 2012 Census 2013 Census 2014

More Related Content