Employer Engagement Strategies for Community Colleges: Lessons Learned from ShaleNET Consortium

slide1 n.w
1 / 15
Embed
Share

Discover insights on utilizing an intermediary to enhance employer engagement within a multi-state community college consortium through the case study of ShaleNET. Explore the methods, industry partnerships, and outcomes of this innovative approach.

  • Employer Engagement
  • Community Colleges
  • ShaleNET Consortium
  • Intermediary Assistance
  • Industry Partnerships

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 1 Lessons Learned: Use of an Intermediary to Assist a Multi-state Consortium of Community Colleges with Employer Engagement November 10, 2015 Kate Dunham, Marian Negoita, and Heather Lewis-Charp

  2. ShaleNET Background 2

  3. ShaleNET Background 3

  4. ShaleNET Background 4

  5. ShaleNET Evaluation Overview 5 Multi-method Design Impact Study Quasi-experimental design Workforce and UI data from PA Academic data from Texas college and UI data from TX Implementation Study Three rounds of site visits Employer & WIB surveys Observations and document reviews

  6. ShaleNET Evaluation Overview 6 How Employer Engagement is Assessed: Industry MSC 2014 membership survey results contributions (in-kind and funding) Semi-structured phone interviews with ACCD staff & 20 oil and gas industry reps. Observations of ShaleNET hub partner meetings and industry advisory groups

  7. ShaleNET Industry Engagement 7 Dual Approach ACCD Outreach Cross-consortium Individual Hub Outreach Shale Oil and Gas Industry Small, local companies Local staff of large companies Large company regional HQ staff

  8. Hub Outreach 8 Industry trade shows, conferences Phone, email, in- person Advisory meetings Lab tours

  9. ACCD Outreach ShaleNET Leadership 9 ACCD (Intermediary) Relationship Building with Industry Leaders General Marketing to Industry Shale Oil and Gas Industry Large company Regional HQ Staff

  10. Results of Dual Approach: Gas and Oil Industry Support 10 Gas and oil industry partners provided extensive and various types of support valued at approximately $770,000 Their [ShaleNET] programs really meet our needs in terms of the coursework and the hands-on training that the college provides. Industry partner, Stark State

  11. Results of Dual Approach: Gas and Oil Industry Support 11 Approximately $232,000 in scholarship funds In-kind donations Equipment conservatively valued at $282,000 Staff members timeto: Assist with finding or serving as instructors Review and provide feedback on program curricula Provide work-based learning opportunities such as internships and facility tours.

  12. Results of Dual Approach: Gas and Oil Industry Support 12 ShaleNET completers Employers expressed satisfaction with ShaleNET completers Employers appreciated career counselors as single point of contact--making it very easy to hire Overall, I love working with [ShaleNET]. The career counselor always sends me quality students that are willing to work hard. The ease of working with her makes [ShaleNET] a great asset to me. They are very responsive, which is what I love. Industry partner, WCCC

  13. Lessons Learned 13 Benefits For large companies; need to connect in both field & boardroom Builds on existing industry connections

  14. Lessons Learned 14 Challenges Consortium & intermediary geography need to align Takes lots of time; not easy to make changes

  15. Questions? 15 Authors Kate Dunham: Kate_Dunham@spra.com, 510-788-2475 Marian Negoita: Marian_Negoita@spra.com, 510-788-2477 Heather Lewis-Charp: Heather@spra.com, 510-788-2471

Related


More Related Content