Engagement Working Group for Resistance-Related Discussions
Evaluate resistance-related discussions in the public domain and develop science-based information in the Issues Engagement Working Group. The group finalizes processes for accepting and acting on issues to address herbicide resistance. Criteria for consideration include relevance, urgency, actionability, and technical or policy focus. Possible actions involve leveraging resources, sponsoring research, publishing white papers, articles, and letters, as well as conducting stakeholder meetings. Initial issues for consideration include resistance testing methods, monitoring, metabolic resistance, and regulatory impacts on resistance management.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
May 14, 2017 Issues Engagement Working Group Finalization of process for accepting and acting on issues
Issues Engagement Working Group Purpose Evaluate resistance-related discussions in the public domain Develop science-based information Members Mark Peterson, Marisa Salas, Harry Strek First Meeting 24 Jan 2017
Issues Engagement Process CLI CropLife International Issues Engagement Working Group GHRAC Main Committee Recommendations Issues Input GHRAC Members CLI Regional HRACs External stakeholders Compilation Clarification Brainstorming Evaluation Recommendations Review Revisions Final prioritization Approval Issues Engagement Working Group Action plans Implementation Output
Criteria for Consideration Does not conflict with anti-trust guidelines Relevance to herbicide resistance Scope (local or global) and potential impact Urgency Is the issue actionable? If so, resource and time requirements to address Purely technical or more policy related?
Possible Actions Leverage of current resources Sponsor new research White papers Journal articles Public letters (e.g. to editors in response to articles) Meetings with stakeholders
Where to start (examples of issues) Resistance testing methods Resistance monitoring Metabolic resistance (impact on MOA labeling, etc.) Impact of regulatory actions on resistance management (mixtures, diversity of tools, etc.) Others?
