Enhanced NAC Assessment Criteria and Covid-19 Compliance Overview
Explore the updated assessment criteria and methodology for NAC funding applications to align with the 2020-2025 strategy. Discover changes, Covid-19 guidelines, and criteria for artistic merit, impact, global recognition, and community support.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
NAC Assessment Criteria, Methodology and Covid-19 Compliance 1
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA CHANGE The purpose of this presentation is to outline alterations to the criteria and methodology for application assessment by programme panel members to better align with the enhanced strategy for 2020 - 2025. This document represents the conclusion of a process of input into the assessment criteria and methodology internally, by ADOs, Managers, POCC and Panel members. The document furthermore outlines the Covid-19 guidelines for projects in the current call for funding. 2
Quadrant Criteria Interaction, innovation, diversity and artistic merit Elaboration -New innovative works on digital platforms, -Showcasing of collaboration -Adheres to 2 out 5 of the NAC values applicable social distancing rules - Re-imagines audiences for digital consumption -Transformation of the sector through NAC values - Non-discrimination - Equal opportunities - Preference given to projects outside of privileged provinces and over-funded metros - Ability to enhance and strengthen capacity building Transformation and Redress - Showcases environmental awareness - Multiplier effect, - Sustainability of art programmes offered, - Lasting effect Programme Impact Ability to transform the sector Lasting impact (legacy) 3
Quadrant Criteria Elaboration Global recognition -Artists as social change makers, -Recognition of artistic work/product produced, beyond own local boundaries, - Potential for profiling the NAC through the funded artistic work - Strengthen marketing of NAC by campaign to engender trust and improve public perception Increased access to market - Audience reach - Consumption and enjoyment of art works through digital platforms Profiling Ability to change the view of arts (advocacy) - Audience reach -Recognise art's power of social and health advocacy - Appreciation and enjoyment of the arts - Showcase value of the arts 4
Quadrant Criteria Elaboration Capacity for partnerships - Sourcing local and other partnerships - Ability to source other funding, in-kind support for arts works - Ability to enhance and strengthen capacity building - Skills transfers possibility - Educational value and possibilities Capacity to pay it forward Partnerships - Projects (and artists) are part of community fabric - Project designed to include a broader audience as part of community life - Community involvement in planning through consultation or through previous activities Community Support 5
Quadrant Criteria Elaboration Organisational management - Track record - Technical skills to manage the project Budget and finance management - Demonstrate ability to work and implement budgets - Sound and feasible budget Feasibility and ability to comply - Demonstrate ability to comply with NAC contract provisions, reporting and reporting periods. - All documents compliant Processes 6
PROPOSED CHANGES TO METHODOLOGY: SCORING Once the assessment criteria is better aligned with the definition of impact in the enhanced strategy doc for 2020 2025, the suggestion is to introduce a scoring system where applications will be scored against the defined criteria. This methodology has been gleaned from best practice in the grant funding landscape and anticipates more coherent and specific feedback to applicants. All of the criteria are equally weighted. 5 - Excellent 4 - Very Good 3 - Good 2 - Fair 1 - Poor 7
Quadrant Criteria Scoring Programme Impact Interaction, innovation, diversity Ability to transform the sector Lasting impact (legacy) OUT OF 5 OUT OF 5 OUT OF 5 OUT OF 15 OUT OF 5 OUT OF 5 OUT OF 5 SUBTOTAL Profiling Global recognition Increased access to market Ability to change the view of arts -advocacy SUBTOTAL Partnerships OUT OF 15 OUT OF 5 OUT OF 5 OUT OF 5 OUT OF 15 OUT OF 5 OUT OF 5 OUT OF 5 OUT OF 15 OUT OF 60 Sustainability through partnerships Capacity to pay it forward Capacity for partnerships SUBTOTAL Processes Organisational management Budget and finance management Feasibility and technical skills SUBTOTAL TOTAL SCORE 8
COVID-19 COMPLIANCE In accordance with the Regulations for Sports, Arts and Culture gazetted on 9 April 2020 and the national Covid-19 regulations in general, all projects considered for funding have to comply with the following guidelines: - - - - - No projects can take place in a stadium or events venue No gatherings of more than 50 people are allowed A social distance of 2m between people in a space is mandatory No local or international travel is permitted Personal Protective Equipment to be used whenever a person goes into the public 9
THANK YOU 10
