Enhancing TAC Processes for Guide Revision Requests in ERCOT Market Rules
"Discover how the Texas TAC Subcommittee is improving organizational processes to align with ERCOT goals, including potential changes in the revision request process and standardization for efficient decision-making."
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Standardizing the Guide Revision Request Processes ERCOT Market Rules TAC Subcommittee/Working Group Meetings ERCOT Public November 2016
Summary of TAC Review Annual Process In an effort to improve TAC s existing processes and organizational structure for the purpose of enhancing efficiency, effectiveness, and aligning its structure to meet new goals and the ERCOT Board s objectives, TAC annually reviews its existing structure and procedures. TAC leadership hosted a meeting on August 25, 2016 to initiate the annual review and solicit input from stakeholders on the following items: Alignment of TAC Goals and Approved Revision Requests with ERCOT Strategic Plan Potential Revision Request Process Changes Incorporation of Other Binding Documents into Protocols/Guides Working Group and Task Force Review 2 Item XXX ERCOT Public/Confidential
Potential Revision Request Process Changes Issue Non-voting bodies are expected to vote/form consensus on Revision Requests. Resolution Modify the Revision Request process so that Guide Revisions originate at the voting Subcommittee level. Working groups will still review/provide feedback on the Revision Requests but voting would happen at the Subcommittee level. This is similar to the current RMGRR approval structure. Issue There are a number of NPRRs with accompanying Guide Revisions that carry the substance of the rule change. The NPRRs are approved at the ERCOT Board level however the Guide changes for the most part are approved at the TAC level. The ERCOT Board is not currently considering the accompanying Guide revisions regardless of where the substance lies. Resolution Both the NPRR and accompanying Guide Revision will require ERCOT Board approval. This resolution will eliminate the discrepancy in the timing of the approval process for associated revisions. 3 Item XXX ERCOT Public/Confidential
Guide Process Flow after Standardization 14 Day Comment Period Revision Request submitted Subcommittee Language Consideration Subcommittee Impact Analysis Review Market Rules Processing ERCOT Board of Directors TAC 5 Business Days ERCOT Board approval is required for revision requests which need a project for implementation [or are related to another revision request requiring ERCOT Board approval.] 4 Item XXX ERCOT Public/Confidential
