ERA Chairs Pilot Call: Developing Excellence in Research Institutions
The ERA Chairs Pilot Call aims to enhance competitiveness and excellence in research institutions under distinguished leadership. Funding opportunities and project details available for European universities and research organizations. Explore the dual-stage project selection process and prestigious opportunities for talented researchers
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
ERA Chairs Euroopa teadusruumi ppetoolid Kristin Kraav 7RP konsultant, ETAG kristin.kraav@etag.ee 730 0337
Infopeva kava Konkursi levaade Kellele, millal, kui palju, milleks Hindamiskriteeriumid Taotluse lesehitus Olulised m rks nad Nutikas spetsialiseerumine Struktuurivahendid ERA p him tted, sh inimressursi strateegia Lisainfo ja konsultatsioon 02.03.2025 2
ERA Chairs Pilot Call (1) Konkurss kuulutati v lja 18.12.13, taotluste esitamise t htaeg on 30. mai 2013 Eesm rk: arendada ekstsellentsi ja t sta osalevate teadusasutuste konkurentsiv imet, v ljapaistva teadlase juhtimisel Projekti kestus kuni 5 aastat Konkursi kogueelarve 12 milj , rahastatakse ~5 projekti Max 1 projekt riigi kohta (ainult pilootkonkursil) 02.03.2025 3
ERA Chairs Pilot Call (2) Osalejad: likoolid ja teadusasutused Euroopa htlus- ja realad (NB! ainult pilootkonkursil), sh Eesti EL rahastus: kuni 2,4 milj kuni 90% projekti kogukuludest Projektit p: CSA (Support Action) kaudsete kulude rahastus 7% otsekuludest 02.03.2025 4
Projekti kaks etappi Edukad osalejad kuulutavad v lja avatud konkursi ppetooli hoidja ametikohale Konkursi kaudu v rvatud ppetooli hoidja juhib projekti elluviimist, sh uurimisgrupi liikmete palkamist 02.03.2025 5
ERA Chair profiil V ljapaistev teadlane ja teadusadministraator t endatud juhtimisoskused, sh projektid Mistahes riigist/rahvusest reegline mitte samast asutusest vastab tasemele Established researcher v i Leading researcher T endatud rahvusvaheline teaduskogemus mobiilsus rahvusvahelised publikatsioonid hea kontaktide v rgustik 02.03.2025 6
ERA Chair vrbamine Juba taotluses esitatakse t koha kirjeldus ja kuulutuse kirjeldus lepingu t p konkurentsiv imeline tasu V rbamine algab kuu aja jooksul p rast grandilepingu allkirjastamist 02.03.2025 7
Projekti eelarve ERA Chair holder konkurentsiv imeline t tasu Uurimisr hma t tasu v hemalt 300 inimkuud, t ist aja ekvivalent Tegevusplaani elluviimise kulud, sh koolitused, koosolekud publitseerimine, patenteerimine aparatuur jne 02.03.2025 8
Konkursi levaade Kellele, millal, kui palju, milleks Hindamiskriteeriumid Taotluse lesehitus Olulised m rks nad Nutikas spetsialiseerumine Struktuurivahendid ERA p him tted, sh inimressursi strateegia Lisainfo ja konsultatsioon 02.03.2025 9
Hindamiskriteeriumid (1): S&T Quality Soundness of concept, and quality of objectives Quality and effectiveness of the support action mechanisms, and associated work plan Level of interaction with national and/or regional authorities in the planning and programming design of smart specialisation strategies. Level of interaction with additional stakeholders, e.g. through clusters and networks to innovative business partners, civil society organisations, etc., able to contribute to the definition and implementation of smart specialisation strategies. 02.03.2025 10
Hindamiskriteeriumid (2): Implementation Appropriateness of the management structure and procedures Quality and relevant experience of the individual participants Quality of the consortium as a whole (including complementarity, balance) [only if relevant] Appropriateness of the allocation and justification of the resources to be committed (staff, equipment ), Feasibility of the tasks allocated to the ERA Chair holder. 02.03.2025 11
Hindamiskriteeriumid (3): Impact Contribution, at the European [and/or international] level, to the expected impacts listed in the work programme under the relevant topic/activity Appropriateness of measures for spreading excellence, exploiting results, and disseminating knowledge, through engagement with stakeholders, and the public at large. 02.03.2025 12
Taotleva asutuse T&A potentsiaal (1) Organisatsiooni struktuur ja tegevused T&A eesm rgid, teadustegevus, rahvusvaheline koost organisatsiooni struktuur, juhtimine ja ressursid teaduskeskkond ja taristu doktorantide koolitamine SWOT anal s: organisatsiooni positsioon riiklikus ja Euroopa kontekstis (organisatsioon tervikuna ja konkreetne all ksus) 02.03.2025 13
Taotleva asutuse T&A potentsiaal (2) Eesm rgid ja tegevused konkurentsiv ime t stmiseks SMART eesm rgid; saavutatavad projekti eluea jooksul koosk las SWOT anal siga s nergia struktuurirahastusega; koosk la nutika spetsialiseerumisega j tkusuutlikkuse strateegia, sh ERA Chair pikaajaliseks palkamiseks ekstsellentsuse kasv vastaval alal konkurentsiv ime, sh ERA p him tted koosk la ERA Chair profiili ja lesannete ning tegevuskava vahel 02.03.2025 14
Rakendamine, juhtimisstruktuur ja protseduurid Project management board ERA Chair on samuti n ukogu liige T plaani elluviimiseks vajalikud ressursid (teadust tajad, taristu, ...) ERA Chairi puudutav: t koha kirjeldus, kuidas see paikneb organisatsiooni struktuuris, kuidas ERA Chairi kaastakse otsuste tegemise protsessi rolli, kohustuste, lesannete kirjeldus kuidas tagatakse ERA Chair autonoomia ERA Chair v rbamise kava 02.03.2025 15
Eeldatav mju Teadusv imekuse kasv, ekstsellentsuse kasv, sh erinevate rahastusallikate m jul Organisatsiooni kasvav osalus H2020 jt programmides ERA p him tete j rgimine Tihedam koost riigiv imudega nutika spetsialiseerumise planeerimisel ja rakendamisel Panus riiklikesse T&A&I infrastruktuuri arengukavadesse Panus riiklikkusse/reginaalsesse majandus- ja sotsiaalarengusse. 02.03.2025 16
Taotluse lesehitus Osa Lk piirang 1: Scientific and/or technical quality, relevant to the topics addressed by the call 20 1.1 Concept and objectives - 1.2 Quality and effectiveness of the support mechanism, and associated work plan 2 + 2/WP 2.1 Management structure and procedures 4 2.2 Individual participants 5 2.4 Resources to be committed 3 3. Impact 7 4. Ethics Issues - 02.03.2025 17
B 1.1 1: Scientific and/or technical quality, relevant to the topics addressed by the call 1.1 Concept and objectives Explain the concept of your project. What are the main ideas that led you to propose this work? Describe in detail the S&T objectives. Show how they relate to the topics addressed by the call, which you should explicitly identify. The objectives should be those achievable within the project, not through subsequent development. They should be stated in a measurable and verifiable form, including through the milestones that will be indicated under section 1.3 below. A clear and detailed analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities and Threats (SWOT) of the applicant research entity should be presented. This SWOT analysis should be the basis of the preparation of the Action Plan composed by a coherent set of measures indicated in the Work Programme. 02.03.2025 18
B 1.2 1: Scientific and/or technical quality, relevant to the topics addressed by the call 1.2 Quality and effectiveness of the support mechanisms, and associated work plan A detailed work plan with activities and SMART objectives to develop research excellence and improve performance should be presented, broken down into work packages (WPs) which should follow the logical phases of the implementation of the project, and include management and assessment of progress and results. Detail past and present interactions with national or regional authorities including the access to Structural Funds in the capacity building of the institution. Explain how these connections will be further developed during the lifeline of the project. Similarly, detail the framework for the creation/development of links with additional stakeholders on designing and implementing research and innovation strategies for smart specialization. 02.03.2025 19
B 2.1 2. Implementation 2.1 Management structure and procedures Describe the organisational structure and decision-making mechanisms of the dedicated project management board responsible for the implementation and how they are matched to the complexity and scale of the project. Present the specific elements for the ERA Chair holder. Those should include descriptions of the ERA Chair position in the institutional structure, his/her rights and obligations, the draft job description and the job advertisement text for the ERA Chair holder, as well as adequate details on the selection procedures for the ERA Chair holder inline with an open recruitment policy. 02.03.2025 20
B 2.2 2. Implementation 2.2 Individual participants For each participant in the proposed project, provide a description of the legal entity, the main tasks they have been attributed, and the previous experience relevant to those tasks. Provide also a short profile of the staff members who will be undertaking the work. If applicable, include a description of training and career development programmes for doctoral candidates. 02.03.2025 21
B 2.4 2. Implementation 2.2 Resources to be committed Describe how the totality of the necessary resources will be mobilised, including any resources that will complement the EC contribution. Show how the resources will be integrated in a coherent way, including how they will allow for the feasibility of the tasks allocated to the ERA Chair holder, and show how the overall financial plan for the project is adequate. Eraldi: suuremad kuluartiklid (nt aparatuur) 02.03.2025 22
B 3.1 2. Impact 3.1 Expected impacts listed in the work programme Describe how your project will contribute towards the expected impacts listed in the work programme in relation to the topic or topics in question. Mention the steps that will be needed to bring about these impacts. Explain why this contribution requires a European (rather than a national or local) approach. Indicate how account is taken of other national or international research activities. Mention any assumptions and external factors that may determine whether the impacts will be achieved. When appropriate (relevant for the topic): With regard to the innovation dimension, describe the potential areas and markets of application of the project results and the potential advantages of the resulting technologies/ solutions compared to those that are available today. 02.03.2025 23
B 3.2 2. Impact 3.2 Spreading excellence, exploiting results, disseminating knowledge Describe the measures you propose for the dissemination and/or exploitation of project results, and how these will increase the impact of the project. In designing these measures, you should take into account a variety of communication means and target groups as appropriate (e.g. policy- makers, interest groups, media and the public at large). When appropriate (relevant for the topic): With regard to the innovation dimension, describe the measures you propose to increase the likelihood of market uptake of project results, such as: verification, testing, and prototyping; supporting the development of technical standards; identifing and collaborating with potential users; identifying potential partners and sources of finance for commercialisation. 02.03.2025 24
B 4 4. Ethics Issues Describe any ethics issues that may arise in the project. In particular, you should explain the benefit and burden of their experiments and the effects it may have on the research subjects. All countries where research will be undertaken should be identified. You should be aware of the legal framework that is applicable and the possible specific conditions that are relevant in each country (EU and non-EU countries alike). It is strongly advised that when drafting the research proposal, the local ethics committee or/and relevant competent authorities (Data Protection, Clinical Trials etc) should be contacted for information and, when applicable, guidance. 02.03.2025 25
Konkursi levaade Kellele, millal, kui palju, milleks Hindamiskriteeriumid Taotluse lesehitus Olulised m rks nad Nutikas spetsialiseerumine Struktuurivahendid ERA p him tted, sh inimressursi strateegia Lisainfo ja konsultatsioon 02.03.2025 26
Nutikas spetsialiseerumine Riiklik nutika spetsialiseerumise strateegia aluseks eelk ige struktuurirahade jaotamisele j rgmisel rahastusperioodil, aga olulise t htsusega ka Horisont 2020 rakendamisel RIS3: Research and Innovation Strategy for Smart Specialisation Koosk las Europe 2020 strateegiaga Eestis: eelt ja anal s: Arengufond v ljund: uue perioodi T&A&I strateegia 02.03.2025 27
RIS3 strateegiad: Suunavad poliitika toetused ja investeeringud riigi/piirkonna t htsaimatele prioriteetidele, probleemidele ja vajadustele teadmistep hise arengu edendamiseks. Tuginevad iga riigi/piirkonna tugevustele, konkurentsieelistele ja tipptaseme saavutamise potentsiaalile. Toetavad nii tehnoloogilist kui ka praktikal p hinevat innovatsiooni ning stimuleerivad erasektori investeeringuid. Kaasavad sidusr hmi t iel m ral ning soodustavad innovatsiooni ja eksperimenteerimist. P hinevad faktidel ning sisaldavad usaldusv rseid seire- ja hindamiss steeme 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 02.03.2025 28
Arengufondi vahearuanne Valmis 19. dets 2012 Nutika spetsialiseerumise anal si 2. etapp: kasvualade valiku kitsendamine 1. etapis selgitati v lja 8 potsentsiaalset kasvusuunda 2. etapi eesm rgiks leida Eesti teaduse ja ettev tluse tugevama hisosaga kasvualad Tulemuseks 3 kasvuala: IKT Tervishoiutehnoloogiad ja teenused Ressursside efektiivsem kasutamine 02.03.2025 29
Struktuurirahade jrgmine periood (2014-2020) Riiklikud arutelud alles algfaasis HTM tugev toetus ERA Chair meetmes osalemiseks 02.03.2025 30
ERA phimtted ERA Communication, juuli 2012 5 prioriteeti, sh open recruitment gender balance peer review doctoral training 02.03.2025 31
Olulised dokumendid ja infoallikad (1) ERA Chairs pilootkonkursi leht http://ec.europa.eu/research/participants/portal/page/call_FP7?callIdenti fier=FP7-ERAChairs-PilotCall- 2013&specificProgram=CAPACITIES#wlp_call_FP7 Work Programme 2013 Research Potential Guide for Applicants (Specific part) - Supporting actions (CSASA) ERA Chairs infop eva leht http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/era-chairs_en.html#infoday 02.03.2025 32
Olulised dokumendid ja infoallikad (2) ERA p him tete veebileht http://ec.europa.eu/research/era/index_en.htm Nutika spetsialiseerumise platvorm http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu/home Gendered innovations http://genderedinnovations.stanford.edu/index.html 02.03.2025 33
Kokkuvte Ainult pilootkonkurss on avatud piiratud taotlejate ringile Rahastus 90% kogukuludest, kuni 2,4 milj viieks aastaks Projekti keskmes on v ljapaistev teadlane ja teadusadministraator, kes palgatakse avatud konkursi kaudu Eesm rgiks on konkurentsiv ime kasv ja tihe koost riigiga nutika spetsialiseerumise valdonnas 02.03.2025 34
