ETMSoE Off-campus Task Force Survey Results 2009
Explore the survey results conducted by the ETMSoE Off-campus Task Force in 2009, including insights on off-campus programming, UCG involvement, delivery modes, potential concerns, and the level of degrees offered. Discover the diverse responses from participants regarding their current involvement in off-campus programs at the E.T. Moore School of Education and the University Center. Gain valuable feedback and comments on delivery methods utilized for various programs.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
ETMSoE Off-campus Task Force Survey Results
Overview Open March 23-27, 2009 N = 43 (approximately 53%) Likert & Open-ended items Off-campus programming / UCG Involvement/Experience Delivery modes Potential Concerns
Are you currently involved in off-campus delivery for a program in the E.T. Moore School of Education? Are you currently involved in off-campus delivery for a program in the E.T. Moore School of Education? 3% 33% no yes other 61%
Have you taught at the University Center? Have you taught at the University Center? 14% No Yes 67%
Are you currently involved in off-campus delivery for a program in the E.T. Moore School of Education? Comments: am in summer have been in the past I have done some in the past and plan to in the future. I teach in the new M. Ed. in Early Childhood Education at the University Center. I teach two classes off campus this semester Off-campus is such a limiting label for all of this! Sometimes teach at UCG and will teach hybrid model in summer and fall.
What level of degree is the program? 2% 9% 12% 14% Undergraduate Graduate Specialist Doctorate 16% non-degree/certification 65% none other 12%
What delivery mode have you used? 16% University Center-Greenville (face- to-face, synchronous) 44% Other site (face-to-face, synchronous) 35% On-line, internet (synchronous and/or asynchronous) Video Teleconferencing 28%
What delivery mode have you used? Comments: I have taught this class several times through several different configurations. In the past, I've done one course almost entirely online, which was not as satisfactory for this particular course. so now we are delivering the course face to face with some asynchronous features. have been in the past Supervise in the schools We're looking into some on-line and internet also.
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for off-campus programming for the Moore School of Education? Greatest potential: 1. Blended on-site & online 2. Traditional face-to-face, site-based 3. Online professional development 4. Videoconference-based, multi-site 5. Online degrees
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for off-campus programming for the Moore School of Education? Combination of on-line and on-site program delivery tailored to specific school/district needs 2% 5% 26% 19% Greatest Great Some Limited None 42%
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for off-campus programming for the Moore School of Education? On-site, in person, traditional course delivery in partnership with schools and districts 5% 9% 7% 19% Greatest Great Some Limited None 51%
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for off-campus programming for the Moore School of Education? On-line professional development courses 2% 5% 16% Greatest Great 33% Some Limited None 37%
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for off-campus programming for the Moore School of Education? Video Teleconferencing to multiple school sites for professional development/certification courses 2% 5% 19% Greatest Great Some 37% Limited None 30%
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for off-campus programming for the Moore School of Education? On-line degree programming 2% 7% 9% Greatest Great Some 47% Limited None 26%
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for off-campus programming for the Moore School of Education? Use of simulation technologies, such as Second Life, for internships or practica 7% 9% 26% 23% Greatest Great Some Limited None 28%
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for off-campus programming for the Moore School of Education? Audio or video streamed lectures with mastery-based assessments 2% 2% 28% 28% Greatest Great Some Limited None 28%
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for off-campus programming for the Moore School of Education? Comments: A blended delivery combining both on-site, face to face interaction with synchronous and asynchronous features. Making the transition from classroom to online is best served with instructor initiative, creativity and enthusiasm for this approach. We're looking into some on-line and internet also. The above must be considered in the light of what and who is being taught. you don't mention traditional in person courses not in partnerships with schools and districts - most of the courses in our department are simply offered at UCG without any partnerships, and I think these courses work well
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Greatest concerns: 1. Administrative assistance and clerical support 2. IT Support 3. Professional networking 4. Infrastructure for non-traditional graduate students 5. Infrastructure for research grants
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Administrative assistance and clerical staff support 7% 19% 16% Greatest Great Some Minor None 19% 33%
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: IT support for hardware 9% 5% 28% Greatest Great Some Minor 28% None 21%
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: IT support for software 9% 5% 23% Greatest Great Some Minor 28% None 26%
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Professional networking for faculty 7% 14% 16% Greatest Great Some Minor None 30% 21%
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Professional networking for students 5% 7% 16% 26% Greatest Great Some Minor None 40%
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Infrastructure for non-traditional (part-time graduate students) 9% 16% 16% Greatest Great Some 16% Minor None 30%
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Infrastructure for research grants 12% 21% Greatest Great 21% Some 9% Minor None 26%
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Student Recruitment 5% 14% 19% 14% Greatest Great Some Minor None 35%
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Access to library 7% 19% 16% Greatest Great Some Minor 19% None 30%
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Social networking for students 2% 7% 14% 28% Greatest Great Some Minor None 30%
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Social networking for faculty 12% 14% 7% Greatest Great Some Minor None 23% 35%
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Advising 5% 16% 12% Greatest Great Some 19% Minor None 37%
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Access to research facilities and labs 5% 19% 9% Greatest Great Some 23% Minor None 35%
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Office space 5% 9% 26% Greatest Great Some 21% Minor None 30%
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Security 0% 7% 14% Greatest Great 44% Some Minor None 23%
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Parking 0% 7% 9% Greatest Great Some 16% Minor 54% None
My concerns about taking programs off-campus are: Comments: Cost of travel for faculty to alternate locations--I cannot afford the gas/mileage without reimbursement. Furniture for new TE suite. IT issues and firewall issues in schools where PD is offered can be frustrating and difficult to overcome. Office space and parking should remain the same for faculty teaching online courses. Particularly if students are taking these courses while physically attending other classes at Clemson. We need to schedule reality office hours for them.We also may want to require students living at Clemson to take exams mid/final in classroom:CUID for attendance.. Quality of programs - our students at the University Center always talk about the lack of quality the find in on-line courses
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for programming at the University Center for the Moore School of Education? Greatest potential: 1. Blended on-site & online programs tailored to local needs 2. Collaboratives with local schools/agencies for internships & practica 3. Online professional development courses 4. Traditional face-to-face courses via UCG but at off-site locations 5. Online degrees
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for programming at the University Center for the Moore School of Education? Combination of on-line and on-site program delivery tailored to specific school/district/community needs in Greenville and Spartanburg 0% 7% 9% 30% Greatest Great Some Limited None 28%
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for programming at the University Center for the Moore School of Education? Use of Greenville and Spartanburg community agency and school sites for internships or practica 0% 5% 21% 14% Greatest Great Some Limited None 35%
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for programming at the University Center for the Moore School of Education? On-line professional development courses 0% 5% 19% 21% Greatest Great Some Limited None 30%
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for programming at the University Center for the Moore School of Education? On-site, in person, traditional course delivery in partnership at local community agencies or school buildings 5% 12% 7% Greatest 14% Great Some Limited None 40%
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for programming at the University Center for the Moore School of Education? On-line degree programming 5% 12% 14% Greatest Great Some Limited None 26% 16%
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for programming at the University Center for the Moore School of Education? Audio or video streamed lectures with mastery-based assessments 5% 9% 16% 16% Greatest Great Some Limited None 28%
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for programming at the University Center for the Moore School of Education? Video Teleconferencing between the University Center and Greenville's Roper Mountain Science center for professional development/certification courses 0% 7% 7% Greatest Great Some 23% Limited None 33%
What do you think present realistic potential opportunities for programming at the University Center for the Moore School of Education? Comments: Again, it largely depends on the faculty engaging the students in class and word of mouth/text about how meaningful AND convenient the classes are. I am not sure about the video teleconferencing capabilities of the University Center I did not respond to many of these items because I am not sure of the resources available at UCG for videoconferencing, etc., and some (online teaching) do not seem directly connected to UCG (could be done from home)
My concerns about working at the University Center are: Greatest concerns: 1. IT Support 2. Professional networking for faculty (for students - #10) 3. Infrastructure for research grants 4. Administrative assistance and clerical support 5. Infrastructure for non-traditional graduate students
My concerns about working at the University Center are: IT support for software 5% 12% 23% Greatest Great Some Minor 9% None 21%
My concerns about working at the University Center are: IT support for hardware 7% 23% 12% Greatest Great Some Minor None 9% 19%
My concerns about working at the University Center are: Professional networking for faculty 5% 19% 21% Greatest Great Some Minor None 19% 9%
My concerns about working at the University Center are: Infrastructure for research grants 9% 12% Greatest Great Some 21% 16% Minor None 12%
My concerns about working at the University Center are: Administrative assistance and clerical staff support 12% 14% 7% Greatest Great Some Minor 14% None 23%
