Evidence Collection Process for MAT Services
The Evidence Collection Process for MAT Services involves three main stages: Planning, Collecting & Submitting. The process includes gathering evidence related to Process, Numerical, and Experiential aspects, based on RAG status indicators. The RAG status categorizes implementation levels across MAT services as RED (limited evidence), AMBER (partial implementation), GREEN (full implementation), and BLUE (sustained implementation). The process steps include creating evidence plans, collecting evidence, recording information, summarizing findings, and reviewing outcomes.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
ADPs ADPs Evidence Collection Evidence Collection Information Session (1) Information Session (1)
Timescale, Evidence Collection Three stages: Planning, Collecting & Submitting. Specifically, evidence collection for: Process, Numerical & Experiential.
What Evidence, To What Extent? What evidence needs to be collected? Process Numerical Experiential To what extent? That depends on the RAG status for each standard....
RAG Status - Overview RED: There is no or limited evidence of implementation of the standard in MAT services. As of yet there are no documented processes or test of change for implementation. There are no systems in place to collect data on time from first presentation to prescription and no documented systematic feedback from people using services. AMBER: There is evidence of partial implementation of the standard in MAT services. A single service test of chance with documented processes, positive trends in time from first presentation to prescription, and systematic feedback from people using services that access and the experience of service use has improved. GREEN: There is evidence of full implementation of the standard across all MAT services. The processes established in an initial test of chance (i.e. SOP and prescribing guidelines for same day assessment and treatment) have been formalised through local governance arrangements and implementation is being rolled out across all MAT services in the ADP. Systems are developing or in place to document the time from first presentation to prescription and positive trends are evident. Systems are in place or developing to enable systematic input from people about their experiences of services. BLUE: There is evidence of sustained implementation and ongoing monitoring of the standard across all MAT services. The standard is implemented across all MAT services in the ADP. Processes have been formalised through local governance arrangements. Sustainable systems are in place to document the time from first presentation to prescription and positive trends are evident. Systems are in place to enable sustained input from people about their experiences of services.
Process Step 1 = Evidence Plan/Priorities shared with ADPs (MIST to create, ADPs agreement) MAT Standard: 1 Numerical Self-Assessed RAG (July 2021) Expected RAG (April 2022) Experiential Step 2 = Collect the evidence (ADPs) (A guide being developed) Form 1 (Process) Step 3 = Record the evidence (ADPs) Form 2 (Numerical) Form 3 (Experiential) Step 4 = Summarise the information (MIST). RAG |Evidence based MAT1 Self RAG Exp RAG Process Experiential Narrative Recommendations Numerical Step 5 = Review summary evidence, actual RAG (MIST/ADPs). Step 1, 2 & 3: Completed (ADPs) by the end of March 2022.
MIST Here to support: Key Contacts MIST Team Principal Lead Role Contact (email) Contact (number) Project Specification Documents (PSDs) Duncan McCormick & Tracey Clusker Advisors duncan.mccormick@phs.scot / tracey.clusker2@phs.scot Process Liz Taylor Project Manager elizabeth.taylor9@phs.scot Numerical Kerry Humphries Principal Information Analyst kerry.humphries2@phs.scot Experiential Dermot Craig & Michelle Buchanan National Officer/s dermot@scottishrecoveryconsortium.org Michelle@scottishrecoveryconsortium.org 07753 801516 07938 684351 Criminal Justice System Liz Taylor & Jessica Davidson Project Manager - Prisons Clinical Nurse Lead Police Custody Nurse Consultant elizabeth.taylor9@phs.scot jessica.davidson2@nhs.scot Process, Clinical/QI Tracey Clusker tracey.clusker2@phs.scot
