Experience Feedback Management in Nuclear Safety Regulations
"Explore DS547, a regulatory document by the International Atomic Energy Agency aiming to improve regulatory bodies' management of experience feedback in nuclear safety standards. Learn about the background, overview, and status of the document, including key sections and member comments."
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
DS547 Regulatory Experience Feedback Management 58thMeeting of the Nuclear Safety Standards Committee (NUSSC) 19 - 21 November 2024 Name : Muhammad Arif JAVAID Division: Nuclear Installation Safety Section: Regulatory Activities Section International Atomic Energy Agency
Background New safety guide Main reason for developing the document is to provide recommendations to regulatory bodies (RBs) to meet Requirement 15 of GSR Part 1 (Rev. 1) To systematically collect, analyse, implement and disseminate lessons learned No generic guidance available for RBs for developing and implementing effective and efficient arrangements for managing regulatory experience feedback IAEA-TECDOC-1899, Effective Management of Regulatory Experience for Safety does not cover all aspects of managing regulatory experience IAEA SSG-50, Operating Experience Feedback for Nuclear Installations Identified as one of the major challenges being faced by RBs in the Conferences discussing effective Nuclear Regulatory Systems since 2013 Long term plan To integrate into the revisions of GSG-12 and GSG-13
Overview of the Document The objective and scope of DS547 remains essentially unchanged as compared to approved DPP The information in DS547 includes Section 2: Concept of regulatory experience Section 3: Management of regulatory experience feedback Section 4: Integration of the regulatory experience feedback management arrangements into the management system Section 5: Application of a graded approach Section 6: Analysis of the effectiveness of the regulatory experience feedback management arrangements Section 7: Training of personnel
Status of the Document The DPP was approved by the Committees in November 2023 The first draft was developed in one Consultancy Meeting (involving five experts) and one Home Based Assignment (involving one expert) during 2024 The first draft was posted on webpage for SSCs review in August 2024 Table of resolution of SSCs comments posted along with the revised version of the draft incorporating comments in October 2024 Approved by WASSC (58thMeeting) and EPReSC (19thMeeting) to share with Member States for their comments
SSC Member Comments: High Interest Inclusion of flowchart in Section 3 to elaborate the arrangements for managing regulatory experience feedback Revision of section 5 (application of a graded approach) Relocation of guidance provided in Annex (identification of sources) as Appendix Relocation of the checklist to be used as a tool for identifying lessons learned and good practices from Appendix to Annex
SSC Member Comments: Not Accepted Comments on formatting of the draft safety guide Verbatim from safety standards References to IAEA publications Comments outside the scope of the draft safety guide More recommendations on operating experience Requests for additional guidance (examples, case studies) to support the regulatory bodies in fulfilling the recommendations
SSC Member Comments: Summary 163 comments from Australia, Brazil, Canada, Finland, India, Pakistan, Republic of Korea, Sweden, UK and USA 110 comments are accepted The comments were mainly for clarification, editorial changes, consistent use of terminology, inclusion of flow chart and relocation of guidance provided in Appendix and Annex All comments were addressed. Comment resolution tables have been shared, and no objections have been received.
SSC Member Comments: Summary Sr. No. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Review Committee NUSSC Member State No. of Comments 5 13 18 24 12 1 5 3 17 16 2 4 20 3 1 11 8 163 Comments Accepted Brazil Canada Finland Germany Japan Pakistan Republic of Korea Sweden United Kingdom United States of America India Republic of Korea France Sweden Australia Brazil Canada 3 10 9 16 8 1 4 2 11 9 1 4 16 2 1 6 7 110 8. 9. 10 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. 17. WASSC RASSC EPReSC Total
Action Requested Approval by NUSSC to proceed to Step 8 for soliciting comments from Member States
Thank you! k.m.alm-lytz@iaea.org m.recio@iaea.org mu.ar.javaid@iaea.org
