Expert Feedback on Ref-TDR Text Review for Improved Structure and Circuit Details
Review feedback highlights the need to reorganize sections to avoid redundancy, clarify circuit design details, and enhance image quality. Suggestions include better coordination between system and circuit descriptions, specifying circuit parameters, and justifying choices with simulations.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Feedback from the Ref-TDR text review Overall Structure Redundancy Check: Ensure no overlap between sections, especially with Chapter 5. System-level descriptions should go to sub-detector chapters, while circuit-level discussions remain in the electronics chapter. Architecture Coordination: Emphasize logical relationships and transitions between sections. Consider moving the global architecture discussion (11.4) before sub-detector specific circuits. It is suggested: all FEE electronics part to be in one section Circuit Details Circuit Design: Add details in 11.3.3.1, such as translating MIP to charge and including SiPM dark counts. Justify circuit choices with simulations. Section Titles: Clarify in 11.6 that it presents an alternative to digital data transmission. Phase Compensation: Specify use cases and expected precision in 11.7.2. General Issues Image Quality: Replace low-quality diagrams with publishable ones. References: Ensure all sections are properly referenced. 1
Recent schedule discussed A 2-day chip review in the next week Wednesday: Data Link + Power Thursday: OTK + SiPM A joint discussion with SiPM vendor & CAL on Wednesday this week 2
Feedback from the Ref-TDR text review - details Overall structure: 11.3, the authors need to check for redundancy in the sub-sections here with those in the sub-detector chapters. I noticed many redundancy with chapter 5 (the one I also read). The authors need to decide on the material in the sub-detector chapter, and in the overall electronics chapter. My suggestion would be, the system-level description goes to the sub-detector chapter, the circuit-level discussion stays in the electronics chapter. This is maybe already the case, so just a reminder. Shouldn t 11.4 Global Architecture be moved before the sections that describe the sub-detector specific circuits? Or, you mean first the detector specific, and then the detector common electronics? But when I read 11.4.1 and 11.4.2, I still think that the discussions about the overall, or global architecture, or consideration, need to be moved up in the chapter. I know that 11.5, the common electronics follow naturally the discussions about the overall structure, but one maybe able to break in the discussions about sub-detector specific electronics, with a paragraph to tell the readers the flow of the sections. 3
Feedback from the Ref-TDR text review - details Circuit Details 11.3.3.1 needs a few sentences. I suggest that we add a column in which we list the parameter that a circuit designer understands: translate MIP to charge that the amplifier sees (that is, including quantum efficiency). We also need to add the SiPM dark counts somewhere. I know that the choices of the circuits have simulation support, I guess we will need to show them somewhere. We should not only present the circuit without justification. In 11.6 one needs to specify in the title that this is only an alternative scheme to the digital data transmission mainly based on optical fiber, or for the data collection part of the data link? 11.7.2, what is the use case for the phase compensation? And what is the precision we expect to achieve? 4
Feedback from the Ref-TDR text review - details General Issues Many of the diagrams, especially those from a screen capture, need to be replaced with those that have publishable quality. Overall, the section authors need to complete their parts with proper references. 5
