Faculty Practices Compliance and Promotion Recommendations
This document outlines the committee's charge to ensure compliance with Faculty Handbook and SOM Bylaws across campuses, provide recommendations for promotion criteria, and assess standards for faculty activities. The methodology, including monthly meetings and document reviews, is detailed, along with key stakeholders met with. Concerns and recommendations touch on regional promotion requirements, faculty tracks, part-time appointments, reviews, and senior appointments.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
* * * SOM CAPT FCSC # * # * * * # # * *
COMMITTEE CHARGE 1. Ensure that practices across the five campuses remain compliant with Faculty Handbook and SOM 1. Ensure that practices across the five campuses remain compliant with Faculty Handbook and SOM Bylaws and are sufficient to capture and promote faculty activities. Bylaws and are sufficient to capture and promote faculty activities. 2. Provide recommendations on distinguishing and more explicitly defining the criteria for promotion 2. Provide recommendations on distinguishing and more explicitly defining the criteria for promotion versus award of tenure with attention to faculty diversity in academic medicine. versus award of tenure with attention to faculty diversity in academic medicine. 3. Make recommendations on the sufficiency of the current standards and 3. Make recommendations on the sufficiency of the current standards and opportunities for improved processes and offer guidance on considering information submitted in the opportunities for improved processes and offer guidance on considering information submitted in the optional COVID and DEI statements. optional COVID and DEI statements.
METHODOLOGY Monthly meetings January December 2023 Committee reviewed following documents: CWRU Faculty Handbook SOM Bylaws SOM Bylaws Appendix I Documents from Faculty Affairs Examples of arms-length violations in external letters CV template Promotion and tenure success statistics provided to Faculty Council Letter of concerns from CCF Committee queried Faculty Affairs representatives from ~ 20 peer institutions
Committee met with: SOM Dean SOM Standing Committee on Bylaws Committee representatives met with: Recently promoted faculty from the four affiliate hospitals Faculty Council Steering Committee Chief Academic Officers and support staff from four hospital affiliates Council of Basic Science Chairs SOM Standing Committee on Women and Minority Faculty SOM Standing Committee on Medical Education CWRU and SOM DEI staff
Concerns/Committee Recommendations Regional reputational requirement for promotion to associate professor in NTT track Career track for faculty primarily engaged in clinical supervision Local versus regional reputation Definition of part-time Appointment/promotion criteria for Instructor and Senior Instructor faculty positions NTT 6-year reviews/improve communication TT faculty engaged in medical education scholarship Public and policy advocacy portfolio Senior level appointments
![Overview of the Faculty Senate at [Institution Name]](/thumb/233771/overview-of-the-faculty-senate-at-institution-name.jpg)
