FFY 2018 Part B Determinations: Including Results for Education Improvement
Learn about the rationale and process of including results in FFY 2018 Part B determinations under IDEA Section 616. Understand the statutory obligation, purpose, and significance of including results data in ensuring educational progress and functional outcomes for children with disabilities. Explore how compliance data and results data are balanced in the revised accountability system for making determinations under Part B.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Using Results in FFY 2018 Part B Determinations
Purpose of this Session To present OSEP s rationale and process for including results in Entities Part B determinations. To respond to questions following the presentation. To get your input on: Using results when making determinations in 2018 under IDEA section 616; How we can best assist you in messaging to your Chiefs and stakeholders that determinations will be based on compliance and results data.
Rationale for Including Results: Statutory Obligation Section 616 of the IDEA requires that the primary focus of IDEA monitoring must be on improving educational results and functional outcomes for children with disabilities, and ensuring that States meet the IDEA program requirements.
Rationale for Including Results: Promotes Purposes of IDEA Equality of opportunity Educational progress and high expectations for all children Full participation in the community Independent living Economic self-sufficiency
Rationale for Including Results: Revised Accountability System RDA Balancing educational results and functional outcomes with compliance requirements Part B determinations Using both results data and compliance data
Rationale for Including Results: Data 618 Data % Graduated with a regular HS diploma % Dropped out % Participation of Children with Disabilities (IDEA) in Statewide Assessments
Process for Including Results Include the following results data in determinations: Graduation Drop out Participation in assessments Reading and math at two grade levels Plus NAEP for BIE
Process for Including Results Compliance Data Points Entity 4B 9 10 11 12 13 Timely Accurate Data X X X X X X X X Timely State Complaints Timely DPH Long Standing Noncompliance Data Points Possible Points (x2) 10 8 12 10 14 10 10 16 A B C D E F G H X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X X 5 4 6 5 7 5 5 8 X X X X X X X X X X X X
Process for Including Results: Results Data Points 1 2 3B: Reading 3B: Math Data Points ALL ENTITIES Possible Points (x2) % Graduated with a Regular HS Diploma % Dropped out % Participation % Participation Regular Assessment Regular Assessment 6 12 4th Grade 8th Grade 4th Grade 8th Grade
Process for Including Results: An Example Results and Compliance Overall Scoring TOTAL POINTS AVAILABLE 12 10 POINTS EARNED SCORE RESULTS COMPLIANCE 6 50 100 TOTAL: 150 10
Process for Including Results An Example Compliance and Results Overall Scoring Results Score/Compliance Score 50/50 40/60 30/70 75% 80% 85%
Process for Including Results: A Phased-In Approach Purpose: Allow time for entities to transition from a focus on compliance to a focus on results and compliance. Calculate the RDA Percentage by adding: 30% of the Entity s Results Score and 70% of the Entity s Compliance Score in year one. 40% of the Entity s Results Score and 60% of the Entity s Compliance Score in year two. 50% of the Entity s Results Score and 50% of the Entity s Compliance score in year 3 and subsequent years.
Questions? Kuestion-mu? Kajjitok? Fesili?
Next Steps Submit suggestions for how to include results in determinations directly to your State Lead or anonymously to your TA provider by August 19. Let your State Lead know how OSEP can assist you in messaging to your Chiefs and stakeholders that determinations will be based on compliance and results data. Send any questions you have about this information to your State Lead. OSEP will respond to your questions, provide support in informing your Chiefs, and consider your suggestions for how to include results in the FY 2018 determinations. THANK YOU!
