History of Biblical Canon Formation and Early Church References

slide1 n.w
1 / 15
Embed
Share

Explore the development of the Biblical canon, from the origins of the term "canon" to how the books were considered authoritative. Learn about the role of the Catholic Church and Protestants in defining the canon, and how the writings of early church figures like Clement of Rome, Ignatius of Antioch, and Polycarp of Smyrna reference these sacred texts.

  • Biblical Canon
  • Early Church
  • Canon Formation
  • Clement of Rome
  • Ignatius of Antioch

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Canon of Scripture

  2. The Canon of Scripture The term canon has its origin in a family of Semitic words that referred to a reed or a rod. In ancient times a straight rod might be marked for the purpose of measuring. The word came to refer to a series of marks used for measurement. The Biblical Canon is the list of books which should be considered the authoritative standard by which faith and conduct is measured.

  3. The Canon of Scripture Who decided what books belong in this authoritative list? How do we know that we have all of the books we are supposed to have? The Catholic Church has addressed this problem through church councils. Protestants claim the Holy Spirit will directly assure Christians of every age that the canon of Scripture is accurate.

  4. The Canon of Scripture God has determined which books belong in the Bible through His inspiration of the Scriptures. Books were accepted based on their inspiration.

  5. Collection and Dispersion of the New Testament The writings of the apostles were originally intended to be circulated. To the churches of Galatia (Gal. 1:2). To the church of God which is at Corinth, with all the saints who are in all Achaia (2 Cor. 1:1). Colossians was to be shared (Col. 4:16). By the writing of 2 Peter (approximately 64 AD), the letters of Paul were spoken of collectively, and were on par with the Old Testament Scriptures (2 Pet. 3:15-16).

  6. Clement of Rome Wrote a letter to the church at Corinth around 95 AD. In the letter he quoted from at least one gospel, Romans, 1 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Hebrews, possibly John, Acts, James and 1 Peter.

  7. Ignatius of Antioch Wrote several letters on his way to martyrdom in 107 AD. In his letters he quotes from Matthew, John, Romans, 1 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, Colossians, 1 Thessalonians, possibly Luke, Hebrews and 1 Peter.

  8. Polycarp of Smyrna Wrote a letter to the church at Philippi. In his letter he quotes Matthew, Luke, Romans, 1 Corinthians, Galatians, Ephesians, Philippians, 2 Thessalonians, 1 and 2 Timothy, Hebrews, 1 Peter, 1 John and possibly John, Acts, 2 Corinthians, Colossians and 2 John.

  9. The Apocrypha Originated in the period between the Old and New Testaments. Jesus never quoted any of these books. No New Testament writer quotes any of these books. They contain teaching that is unbiblical or heretical.

  10. The Pseudepigrapha A collection of books containing various forms of literature, using names of famous people for the titles of the books. The real authors are unknown. These books were written as propaganda for heretical sects, and were attributed to known people to give them credibility. They contain doctrinal error, fanciful tales, and historical inaccuracies (proving they are not of true divine inspiration).

Related


More Related Content