ICAO Universal Safety Oversight Audit Program: Effective Implementation & Critical Elements
"Learn about ICAO's USOAP CMA approach, audit areas, critical elements, and Malaysian experience in implementing State safety oversight. Understand how the audit process works, corrective action plans, and State Safety Concerns. Explore the scope and conduct of audits based on ICAO Doc.9735 to ensure effective implementation. Discover the importance of primary aviation legislation, operating regulations, safety oversight functions, technical guidance, personnel qualifications, licensing, and surveillance obligations within the aviation industry."
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
ICAO UNIVERSAL SAFETY OVERSIGHT AUDIT PROGRAMME (USOAP) CONTINUOUS MONITORING APPROACH (CMA) USOAP AIG EFFECTIVE IMPLEMENTATION(EI) AAIB MALAYSIAN EXPERIENCE 20thDecember 2018
SUMMARY What is ICAO USOAP CMA? Scope and conduct of Audit Audit areas/ Critical Elements Audit preparation Conduct of audit Sharing of AAIB Malaysia Audit findings Corrective action plan State Safety Concern
USOAP CMA The approach for USOAP audits is based on: the implementation of a structured process and methodology for the planning, preparation, conduct, reporting, follow-up and evaluation of ICAO safety oversight audits, in order to determine State capability for safety oversight.
AUDIT AREAS Aircraft Operations Annexes 2, 6, 18, 19 & PANS-OPS Airworthiness of Aircraft Annexes 6, 7, 8, 16 & 19 Personnel Licensing Annexes 1 & 19 Organization & Safety Oversight Functions SAAQ Legislation and Regulations Chicago Convention & Annexes 2 & 19 Effective State Safety Oversight System Accident & Incident Investigation Annexes 13 & 19 Air Aerodromes Annexes 14 & 19 Navigation Services Annexes 2,3,4,5 10,11,12,15, 19 & PANS-ATM
SCOPE/CONDUCT OF AUDIT Based on ICAO Doc 9735 and MOU signed between Malaysia and ICAO Covers 8 audit areas: LEG, ORG, PEL, OPS, AIR, AIG, ANS, AGA Protocol Questions are main tools used for conduct of audit Each PQ is linked to one of 8 critical elements (CEs) of State s safety oversight system Effective Implementation (EI) is indication of State s capability for safety oversight
CRITICAL ELEMENTS (CEs) CE-1 Primary aviation legislation CE-2 CE-3 Specific operating regulations State civil aviation system & safety oversight functions CE-5 Technical guidance, tools & provision of safety-critical information CE-4 Technical personnel qualifications & training ESTABLISH IMPLEMENT CE-6 Licensing, certification, authorization and/or approval obligations CE-7 Surveillance obligations CE-8 Resolution of safety concerns
AUDIT PREPARATION Completion/updates of the State Aviation Activity Questionnaire (SAAQ): Completion/updates of the Compliance Checklist (CCs) through the Electronic Filing of Differences (EFOD) System; Completion/updates of the USOAP CMA protocol Questionaires
CONDUCT OF AUDIT: PQs Protocol Questions (PQs) Standardize conduct of audits to ensure transparency, quality and reliability Not satisfactory PQ is reflected in LEI Evidence-based approach: Show me Lack of evidence = PQ finding Over 10,000 SARPs in the CC/EFOD database (in the 19 ICAO Annexes) (Annex 13 120 SARPs) A total of 1099 PQs (AIG 109 PQs)
Protocol Question Example ICAO Reference
PICTURE OF AUDIT SESSION AT AAIB OFFICE 2nd to 12th May 2016
AUDIT RESULT NON SAT CE 1 Independence of the investigation, Non-disclosure of CVR information and Non- disclosure of information other than CVR. CE 2 To replace incident to serious incident for regulation 183 of CAR 2016 and to include definition of serious incident at regulation186
AUDIT RESULT - NON SAT CE 3 Perceived and actual conflict of interest for seconded expert to AAIB CE 4 Training programme IDP/OJT
AUDIT RESULT - NON SAT CE 5 Sufficiency of equipment/ protective equipment and Fitness of investigators Systematic notification to ICAO Procedure and guidance for serious incident investigation Responsible person for unauthorized access to draft report
AUDIT RESULT NON SAT CE 8 Establish and implement a comprehensive safety related notification on safety related incidents so that AAIB obligation to conduct serious incident investigation is full filled. Established a state level accident and incident database
Audit Results based on PQs for Effective Implementation Critical Element Area of concern (Non Satisfactory) Remarks Total PQs Non Sat. PQs 3 CE 1 10 Independence of the investigation, Non-disclosure of CVR information and Non- disclosure of information other than CVR. To be incorporated into primary legislation, Malaysia is filing differences . Agree with audit finding CE 2 15 1 To replace incident to serious incident for regulation 183 of CAR 2016 and to include definition regulation186 Perceived and actual conflict of interest for seconded expert to AAIB Training programme IDP/OJT of serious incident at CE 3 14 2 Agree with audit finding CE 4 7 3 Agree with audit finding 49 8 Agree with audit finding i. Sufficient equipment/ protective equipment/Fitness of investigators Systematic notification to ICAO Procedure and guidance for serious incident investigation iv. Responsible person for unauthorized access to draft report CE 5 ii. iii. CE 6 CE 7 CE 8 0 0 0 0 10 14 Agree with audit finding Establish and implement a comprehensive safety related notification on safety related incidents so that AAIB obligation to conduct serious incident investigation is full filled. Established a state level accident and incident database Total CE Note; There were no PQs on CE 6 and 7 109 27
DRAFT REPORT The Draft Report is the first ICAO official report of the audit. It is submitted to the State within 90 calendar days after the audit closing meeting. The State has 45 days to comment on the draft report.
FINAL REPORT The Final Report is the official report of the audit. It supersedes the Draft Report that has been distributed earlier. It is sent to the State within 30 calendar days after the State has submitted to ICAO its comments on the draft audit report.
CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN Should address ALL the findings contained in the final Audit Report. Provide specific actions and time-lines for the resolution of each of the findings. Indicate the officer responsible for each action. States are encouraged to use the State Corrective Action Plan Template developed and provided by ICAO for this purpose.
STATE SAFETY CONCERN A significant safety concern occurs when the audited State allows the holder of an authorization or approval to exercise the privileges attached to it, although the minimum requirements established by the State and by the Standards set forth in the Annexes to the Chicago Convention are not met, resulting in an immediate safety risk to international civil aviation. Implications to States with SSC !
AAIB CHALLENGES Qualified Technical Personnels Legislations/Regulations Budget for training and equipment State level accident and incident database.
THANK YOU ANY QUESTION...
