IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 Box 5 Calibration Results May 2016
"Explore calibration results for IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 Box 5 from May 2016, presented by MediaTek Inc. Dive into the simulation results and configuration details for PHY and MAC parameters in this insightful document."
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 Box 5 Calibration Results Date: 2016-05-14 Authors: Name Affiliation Address Phone email Marik Hsiao Mediatek 2840 Junction Ave San Jose, CA 95131, USA marik.hsiao@mediate k.com Andrew Tsai Mediatek 2840 Junction Ave San Jose, CA 95131, USA andrew.tsai@mediatek .com Wilson Tsao Mediatek 2840 Junction Ave San Jose, CA 95131, USA wilson.tsao@mediatek .com Jack Lee Mediatek 2840 Junction Ave San Jose, CA 95131, USA jack.lee@mediatek.co m Chung-Ta Ku Mediatek 2840 Junction Ave San Jose, CA 95131, USA chung- ta.ku@mediatek.com Paul Cheng Mediatek 2840 Junction Ave San Jose, CA 95131, USA paul.cheng@mediatek .com Russell Huang Mediatek 2840 Junction Ave San Jose, CA 95131, USA Russell.huang@media tek.com Submission Slide 1 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 Introduction Calibration effort in IEEE 802 TGax is guided by [2]. Box 5 calibration is now following the decisions in [1], [3], [4]. A few companies have provided calibration results, in [5], [6]. In this presentation, the following simulation results of Box 5 calibration from a different simulation system, OMNet++, are presented. 1 BSS DL: 1 case UL: 9 cases 2 BSS DL: 1 case UL: 1 case Mix DL&UL: 2 cases 3 BSS DL: 1 case UL: 1 case Mix DL&UL: 1 cases Submission Slide 2 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 Box 5 Calibration Configuration PHY [1] PHY parameters BW All BSSs at 5GHz [80 MHz, no dynamic bandwidth] Aligned primary 20MHz channel for each co-80MHz-channel BSS; The detection of preamble and BA should only focus on primary 20MHz TGac D NLOS per link iid log-normal shadowing (0 dB standard deviation) per link Control: legacy 20us; Data: 11ac (20us+20us for 1antenna case) Basic 6Mbps rate for RTS/CTS/ACK/BA (MCS0) [1] 20/15 dBm per antenna Scaled to 80 MHz 1/1 0/-2 dBi 7dB -56 dBm (measured across the entire bandwidth after large-scale fading) -76 dBm (a packet with lower rx power is dropped) Fixed MCS =5 for 11ac SS6 and TBD for 11ax SS1-4 Ideal unless otherwise specified RBIR, BCC (see appendix 1&3 in [2]) 4us with 800ns GI per OFDM symbol Primary channel Channel model Shadow fading Preamble type Legacy control frame rate AP/STA TX Power Power Spectral density number of antennas at AP /STA AP /STA antenna gain Noise Figure CCA-ED threshold Rx sensitivity/CCA-SD Link Adaption Channel estimation PHY abstraction Symbol length Submission Slide 3 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 Box 5 Calibration Configuration MAC [1] MAC parameters [EDCA, AC_BE with default parameters] [CWmin = 15, CWmax = 1023, AIFSn=3 ] A single queue for each traffic link is set inside AP/STA sized of 2000 packets UDP CBR with rate 10^8bps Random start time during a 10ms interval 1544 Bytes (1472 Data + 28 IP header + 8 LLC header + 30 MAC header + 4 delimiter + 2 padding) [A-MPDU / max aggregation size / BA window size, No A-MSDU, immediate BA without explicit request], Max aggregation: 32 MPDUs 10 Disabled unless otherwise specified OFF unless otherwise specified >= 10s per drop -CDF or Histogram of per non-AP STA throughput (received bits/overall simulation time) -PER of all AP/STA (1 - # of success subframes / # of transmitted subframes) Access protocol Queue length Traffic type MPDU size Aggregation Max number of retries Beacon RTS/CTS Running time Output metric Submission Slide 4 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 Box 5 Calibration Topology [1] Fixed Location and Association 30 BSS A STA locations BSS B STA locations assuming (xb,yb)=(40,20) BSS C STA locations assuming (xb,yb)=(-40,-20) 27 STA1 (5,-9.5) 20 15 STA2 (3.5,7.5) 21 STA4 (-4.5,0.5) 9 3 10 26 STA5 (-1.5,6) 8 11 23 2 5 STA7 (-9,-5) 29 STA8 (-8.5,8.5) 4 10 0 14 20 STA10 (-3,0.5) 13 19 22 25 17 7 28 16 STA11 (-0.5,8) 1 -10 STA13 (-4,-4) 12 6 STA14 (7.5,-1) 30 24 18 -20 STA16 (8,-6) STA17 (0,-7.5) STA19 (-2.5,-4.5) -30 STA20 (0.5,-2) -50 -40 -30 -20 -10 0 10 20 30 40 50 STA22 (0,-4.5) STA23 (-1.5,7) AP A (0,0) STA3 (7.5+xb, -9.5+yb) STA6 (-5.5+xc,4.5+yc) STA25 (3.5,-5) AP B (40,20) STA9 (7+xb, -7.5+yb) STA12 (7+xc,7+yc) STA26 (9,9.5) AP C (-40,-20) STA15 (3+xb, -0.5+yb) STA18 (10+xc,0.5+yc) STA28 (-8,-5.5) STA21 (-6.5+xb, -3+yb) STA24 (3+xc,2.5+yc) STA29 (1.5,3.5) STA27 (-6+xb, 2.5+yb) STA30 (9.5+xc,3.5+yc) Submission Slide 5 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 1 BSS (B) 3 STAs (STA3, 9, 15) UL Analysis x y distance to AP pathloss rcvdPower AP 40 20 0 STA3 7.5+40 -9.5+20 12.10 73.84278 -60.59853763 STA9 7+40 -7.5+20 10.26 71.32951 -58.08526602 STA15 3+40 -0.5+20 3.04 56.08659 -42.84234659 Interferenc ePwr collide rcvdPwr SINR Success PER dbm mw STA3_9 ST9 -58.09 ST3 -60.60 8.71E-07 2.51 0 1 STA3_15 ST15 -42.84 ST3 -60.60 8.71E-07 17.76 98.55% 1.45% STA9_15 ST15 -42.84 ST9 -58.09 1.55E-06 15.24 8.31% 91.69% STA3_9_15 ST15 -42.84 ST3 -60.60 8.71E-07 13.1 0% 100% ST9 -58.09 1.55E-06 Submission Slide 6 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 MCS 5 PER in Channel Model D NLOS MCS 5 PER in Channel Model D NLOS 1.2 1 0.8 1-PER 0.6 PER 0.4 0.2 0 8.5 9.5 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 8 9 10.5 11.5 12.5 13.5 14.5 15.5 16.5 17.5 18.5 19.5 20.5 21.5 22.5 23.5 24.5 25.5 SINR Submission Slide 7 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 1 BSS (B) 3 STAs Results UL Throughputs Comparison: STA 3 + STA 9 + STA 15 200 180 160 140 120 Mbps 100 80 60 40 20 0 NEWRAC OM 59.4 60.03 58.02 Huawei Intel Sony NTT LG Marvell ZTE WILUS TOSHIBA APPLE MTK STA 15 STA 9 STA 3 61.125 60.183 59.894 61.47 59.23 60.46 58.941 61.18 59.451 59.484 61.447 58.37 61.65 60.59 57.09 73.321 55.552 56.335 64.749 59.4145 55.6777 60.79 60.39 60.75 59.96 59.15 60.27 62.32 60.32 58.89 72.4 54.03 54.86 Submission Slide 8 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 1 BSS (B) 3 STAs (STA3, 9, 27) UL Analysis x y distance to AP B 0 12.10371844 10.25914226 6.5 pathloss rcvdPower(STA->B) AP B STA3 STA9 STA27 40 47.5 47 34 20 10.5 12.5 22.5 73.84278362 71.32951202 64.39259267 -60.59853763 -58.08526602 -51.14834668 The SINR in AP B should be lower than 10 when any collisions occurs AP B cannot successfully decode any data if the collisions occur. STA3, 9, and 27 should have the similar throughputs. Submission Slide 9 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 1 BSS (B) 3 STAs Results UL Throughputs Comparison: STA 3 + STA 9 + STA 27 200 180 160 140 120 Mbps 100 80 60 40 20 0 NEWRAC OM 59.24 60.57 57.68 Huawei Intel Sony NTT LG Marvell ZTE WILUS TOSHIBA APPLE MTK STA 27 STA 9 STA 3 60.179 59.934 59.852 63.21 63.26 54.62 60.256 59.3 59.944 60.034 59.324 60.373 48.62 65.41 63.94 57.143 63.844 59.035 59.3948 61.0681 58.9255 60.76 60.66 60.57 61.09 60.73 60.91 60.54 60.23 59.95 58.91 58.66 60.55 Submission Slide 10 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 2 BSS DL Analysis x y distance to AP B pathloss rcvdPower(A->B) AP A 0 0 44.72135955 93.70865011 -73.46440412 The interference powers received by AP A and AP B are both higher then sensitivity. The interference from AP A or AP B to STAs in BSS B or BSS A is small, respectively All STAs can successfully decode their packets Conclusions All STAs throughputs in the same BSS should be similar. BSS A and BSS B should have the similar total throughputs Submission Slide 11 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 2 BSS (A+B) Results 2 BSS DL Throughputs Comparison 120 100 80 Mbps 60 40 20 0 STA 1 5.9 6.13 5.58 6.01 5.82 5.38 5.76 5.59 6.28 5.77 5.47 6.31 5.25 6.17 Newracom 6.72 6.44 6.25 6.21 5.96 5.8 5.76 5.7 5.58 5.55 5.48 5.43 5.38 5.33 Nokia 5.81 5.78 5.83 5.83 5.83 5.7 5.83 5.82 5.83 5.82 5.76 5.81 5.82 5.82 ZTE 8 4.45 7.38 6.79 6.93 6.02 6.21 3.62 5.75 5.94 6.11 6.96 6.82 5.8 MediaTek 5.2 5.93 5.65 5.72 6.01 5.7 5.61 5.74 5.65 5.31 5.69 5.96 5.5 5.79 STA 2 STA 4 STA 5 STA 7 STA 8 STA 10 STA 11 STA 13 STA 14 STA 16 STA 17 STA 19 STA 20 STA 22 STA 23 STA 25 4.09 5.33 4.52 6.02 101 25.9 2.98 2.96 2.94 2.94 93.4 28.3 5.81 5.26 5.8 5.82 104 27.8 28.4 28.4 4.78 5.37 7.94 4.41 109 26.4 27.2 27.1 5.79 5.74 6.01 5.88 103 25.8 25.8 25.8 STA 26 STA 28 STA 29 BSS A STA 3 STA 9 26 28 STA 15 25.8 27.3 STA 21 STA 27 26 26.6 110 28.4 113 26.3 107 25.8 103 BSS B 104 INTEL Submission Slide 12 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 2 BSS, A DL B UL, Analysis x 0 y 0 distance to AP A pathloss rcvdPower(STA->A) AP A STA3 STA21 STA27 47.50 33.50 34.00 10.50 17.00 22.50 48.65 37.57 40.77 94.98748909 91.0586944 92.30281117 -81.7432431 -77.81444841 -79.05856517 The interference powers from STA3, 21, and 27 to AP A are all lower than sensitivity. AP A will send out its DL data without suspending BO counters. The interference powers from STA 3, 21, and 27 to STAs in BSS A are small except STA26 Only when STA26 is receiving its DL data and STA21 and/or STA27 send UL data simultaneously, the SINR will decrease to around 17.5 The probability is small SINR 17.5 still has around 98.5% successful rate. Submission Slide 13 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 2 BSS (A+B) Results 2 BSS, A DL, B UL Throughputs Comparison 250 200 150 Mbps 100 50 0 STA 1 3.29 3.8 3.83 3.25 3.93 3.35 3.66 4.09 4.51 3.43 3.98 3.91 4.21 4.26 Newracom 0.31 0.3 0.32 0.3 0.34 0.34 0.36 0.29 0.28 0.36 0.35 0.32 0.29 0.3 Nokia 10.9 10.9 11 11 10.9 10.9 MediaTek 11 9.67 10.4 10.6 9.52 9.47 9.45 10.9 10.1 10.7 10.7 9.82 10.5 10.9 STA 2 STA 4 STA 5 STA 7 STA 8 STA 10 STA 11 STA 13 STA 14 STA 16 STA 17 STA 19 STA 20 STA 22 STA 23 STA 25 3.24 3.78 3.06 3.66 67.2 33.9 0.29 0.31 0.34 0.34 5.72 38.4 10.9 7.53 10.9 10.9 193 23.2 11 9.45 9.52 10.8 184 17.1 STA 26 STA 28 STA 29 BSS A STA 3 STA 9 STA 15 STA 21 53.6 38.7 126 56.2 60.6 155 13.8 17.3 54.2 29.7 29.8 76.6 STA 27 BSS B INTEL 11 10.9 11 10.9 10.9 11 11 10.9 Submission Slide 14 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 2 BSS, A UL B DL, Analysis All the interference powers from BSS A STAs to AP B are lower than sensitivity. All the interference powers from BSS A STAs to BSS B STAs are small as well. AP B will continue send DL data without suspending BO counters. The interference powers from AP B to STA2, 5, 23, 25, 26, and 29 are higher than sensitivity. The throughputs of other STAs will depend on SINR and PER. Submission Slide 15 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 2 BSS (A+B) Results 2 BSS, A UL, B DL Throughputs Comparison 250 200 150 Mbps 100 50 0 STA 1 13.7 13.4 10.2 11.1 12.2 14.3 Newracom 4.57 15.3 16.8 18.3 6.69 13.9 Nokia 0.22 0.36 39.6 0.29 15.6 7.5 MediaTek 2.56 0.39 27.4 0.71 4.13 0.14 STA 2 STA 4 STA 5 STA 7 STA 8 STA 10 STA 11 STA 13 STA 14 STA 16 STA 17 STA 19 STA 20 STA 22 9.59 12.4 9.7 12.3 10.6 13.1 143 9.96 8.12 6.03 7.69 10.7 19.3 137 0.19 0.24 0.24 0.22 0.38 0.48 0.26 18.9 0.41 84.3 49.6 49.8 32.4 0.55 0.95 0.63 7.09 0.86 77.8 47.7 47.7 47.7 STA 23 STA 25 STA 26 STA 28 STA 29 BSS A STA 3 3.8 STA 9 2.9 9.36 STA 15 STA 21 STA 27 7.88 23.9 0.31 0.98 49.9 199 47.7 191 BSS B INTEL 50 Submission Slide 16 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 2 BSS (A+B) Results 2 BSS UL Throughputs Comparison 160 140 120 100 Mbps 80 60 40 20 0 STA 1 8.31 14.8 10.1 7.63 6.2 13.4 Newracom 2.66 4.86 4.3 8.38 5.55 3.89 Nokia 13.7 5.26 15.7 12.2 14.5 8.57 ZTE 2.69 11.7 17.7 14.9 3.11 1.35 MediaTek 7.59 12.6 14.4 11.5 10.6 5.03 STA 2 STA 4 STA 5 STA 7 STA 8 STA 10 STA 11 STA 13 STA 14 STA 16 STA 17 STA 19 STA 20 STA 22 11.7 7.79 11.4 11.4 4.71 16.5 124 8.73 8.31 5.51 3.43 6.9 6.78 7.77 68.3 17.8 12.3 14 10.5 4.27 14.6 9.81 135 47.9 16.4 12.4 17.1 2.83 4.69 22.8 128 5.29 12.6 11.7 13 1.9 13.9 14.5 129 26.9 STA 23 STA 25 STA 26 STA 28 STA 29 BSS A STA 3 STA 9 STA 15 STA 21 24.7 20.3 53.7 25.5 24.8 68.1 46 54.1 148 65.8 62.9 134 58.2 61.2 146 STA 27 BSS B INTEL Submission Slide 17 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 3 BSS Results 3 BSS DL Throughputs Comparison 200 180 160 140 120 Mbps 100 80 60 40 20 0 ST A 10 ST A 11 ST A 13 ST A 14 3 ST A 16 2.8 2.9 1.8 2.7 ST A 17 ST A 19 ST A 20 ST A 22 ST A 23 ST A 25 2.9 2.7 2.8 2.8 48 2.3 2.1 2.2 2.4 40 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 1.6 50 4.5 2.1 2.7 3.6 62 1.1 1 1 ST A 26 ST A 28 ST A 29 ST A 15 17 15 50 37 44 ST A 21 ST A 27 18 16 50 199 50 39 149 35 44 176 44 ST A 12 24 1.1 50 37 44 ST A 18 21 1 50 35 44 ST A 24 ST A 30 20 1 50 198 35 142 44 175 ST A 1 ST A 2 ST A 4 ST A 5 ST A 7 ST A 8 BSS A ST A 3 ST A 9 BSS B ST A 6 BSS C INTEL Newracom 2.2 2.2 2.3 2.3 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.2 2.1 2.1 2.2 2.2 Nokia 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 ZTE 2.5 4.8 4.5 4.2 2.9 5.5 5.2 4.1 2.3 1.2 1.7 2.5 4.4 2.9 MediaTek 1 1 1 1 1.1 1.1 2.6 2.8 2.3 3 2.5 2.6 2.4 2.4 2.8 16 16 18 17 50 36 44 70 64 25 1 91 4.1 37 44 0 0 1 1.1 1 1.1 1 1 0.9 1.1 1.1 18 Submission Slide 18 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 3 BSS Results 3 BSS UL Throughputs Comparison 180 160 140 120 INTEL 100 Mbps Newracom 80 Nokia ZTE 60 MediaTek 40 20 0 Submission Slide 19 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 3 BSS Results 3 BSS Mix DL/UL Throughputs Comparison (UL Portion) 140 120 100 80 Mbps Nokia ZTE 60 MediaTek 40 20 0 Submission Slide 20 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 3 BSS Results 3 BSS Mix DL/UL Throughputs Comparison (DL Portion) 100 90 80 70 60 Mbps Nokia 50 ZTE 40 MediaTek 30 20 10 0 Submission Slide 21 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 Conclusion Results from 1 BSS test cases align with prior efforts from other companies Results from 2 BSS DL test case align with prior efforts from other companies Lack of alignment in other 2BSS test cases and all 3BSS test cases due to sparseness of test results submitted and divergence among submitted results Since prior efforts suggest DL test results are easier to align, we are waiting for more results for the 2BSS and 3BSS DL test cases as the next step to analyze and come up with convergent results Submission Slide 22 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 Reference [1] 11-15/0680r3 Reference Box5 Calibration Assumptions and Parameters [2] 11-15/0980r10 TGax Simulation Scenarios [3] 11-14/1523r5 Offline Discussion Minutes of SLS Calibration [4] 11-15/0681r1 TG ax Scenarios: Proposed Text additions to 14/980 for Box5 Calibration [5] 11-15/0802r1 Calibration Results of SS6 [6] 11-15/0885r0 Box 5 calibration result Submission Slide 23 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 APPENDIX Submission Slide 24 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 1 BSS (B) DL Results DL Throughputs Comparison: All 5 STAs (3,9,15,21,27) 250 200 150 Mbps 100 50 0 NEWRAC OM 38.4 38.42 38.38 38.44 38.43 Huawei Intel Sony NTT LG Marvell ZTE WILUS TOSHIBA APPLE MTK STA 27 STA 21 STA 15 STA 9 STA 3 38.277 38.629 39.448 39.626 39.583 40.28 38.02 39.13 38.61 39.73 38.775 38.071 39.027 39.745 39.76 38.799 38.96 38.811 38.866 38.885 42.04 41.79 41.45 41.57 41.64 39.109 39.816 40.596 39.87 39.73 38.95 40.61 40.19 40.62 38.95 38.51 39.15 39.94 39.45 40.09 41.07 39.37 39.89 38.27 38.23 38.91 38.89 39.29 39.12 39.34 38.3 37.14 39.69 39.38 39.13 Submission Slide 25 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 1 BSS (B) 1 STA Results STA 3 103 102 102 101 Mbps 101 STA 3 100 100 99 99 Submission Slide 26 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 1 BSS (B) 1 STA Results STA 9 103 102 102 101 101 Mbps 100 100 STA 9 99 99 98 98 Submission Slide 27 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 1 BSS (B) 1 STA Results STA 15 STA 15 103 103 102 102 102 102 101 101 101 Mbps 101 STA 15 STA 15 100 100 100 100 99 99 99 99 Submission Slide 28 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 1 BSS (B) 1 STA Results STA 21 103 102 101 100 Mbps 99 STA 21 98 97 96 Submission Slide 29 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 1 BSS (B) 1 STA Results STA 27 103 102 102 101 Mbps 101 STA 27 100 100 99 99 Submission Slide 30 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 1 BSS (B) 2 STAs Results UL Throughputs Comparison: STA 3 + STA 9 200 180 160 140 120 Mbps 100 STA 9 80 STA 3 60 40 20 0 Submission Slide 31 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 1 BSS (B) 2 STAs Results UL Throughputs Comparison: STA 3 + STA 15 250 200 150 Mbps STA 15 100 STA 3 50 0 Submission Slide 32 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
May 2016 doc.: IEEE 802.11-16/0629r2 1 BSS (B) 2 STAs Results UL Throughputs Comparison: STA 3 + STA 27 200 180 160 140 120 Mbps 100 STA 27 80 STA 3 60 40 20 0 Submission Slide 33 Marik Hsiao, MediaTek Inc.
