Impact of Performance Audits in Government

assessing the impact of performance audits n.w
1 / 15
Embed
Share

Explore the process of performance audits, from annual work programs to monitoring recommendations and implementing audit recommendations by ANAO and Parliament. Learn how audits provide insights for improvement and accountability in government entities.

  • Government
  • Audits
  • Recommendations
  • Accountability
  • Implementation

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assessing the impact of performance audits Michelle Page Senior Executive Director Performance Audit Services Group

  2. Assessing the impact of performance audits Annual Audit Work Program Audits and recommendations New appendix on impact Implementation of recommendations Parliamentary inquiries Audit Insights

  3. Annual Audit Work Program Commences around October each year Environmental scan for challenges, risks and potential topics Consultation with entities and Parliament Published on or after 1 July each year Triggers activity by entities to review their activity in topic areas

  4. Audits and recommendations ANAO provides potential recommendations to entities prior to the final draft report ANAO aims to be targeted in developing recommendations Entities are asked to clearly agree or disagree to recommendations Appendix on impact during the audit

  5. Monitoring recommendations ANAO has key performance indicators in our corporate plan relating to recommendations: 90% of recommendations agreed without qualification 70% of recommendations implemented within 24 months ANAO participates as an observer in entity audit committees which have a role in monitoring the implementation of recommendations

  6. Implementation of ANAO and Parliamentary recommendations The ANAO regularly undertakes follow-ups of prior year audits to provide assurance on the implementation of agreed ANAO recommendations Follow ups are also done on a case by case basis within individual performance audits From 2018-19 we have initiated a new series of cross- entity audits, examining implementation of both ANAO and parliamentary committee recommendations Audits will utilise both limited and reasonable assurance processes to ensure an efficient audit approach

  7. Recommendations from recent audits and inquiries Implementation of ANAO and Parliamentary Committee Recommendations audit reports examined: Department of Agriculture, Airservices Australia, Australian Pesticides and Veterinary Medicines Authority and Department of Infrastructure, Transport, Cities and Regional Development Department of Education and Department of Health Department of Defence Department of Home Affairs Attorney-General s Department (currently underway)

  8. Implementation of ANAO and Parliamentary recommendations A reasonable timeframe for the implementation of agreed ANAO recommendations was taken as within two calendar years of the tabled report.

  9. Audit rationale, focus and findings Audit rationale: reports of the ANAO and parliamentary committees identify risks to the successful delivery of outcomes and areas where administrative or other improvements can be made. Audit focus: entities arrangements to respond to and monitor implementation of recommendations Overall finding: mixed success across entities; strong correlation between entities governance arrangements and successful implementation

  10. Audit Conclusion None of the entities demonstrated that they had effectively implemented all agreed recommendations [In our 2021-22 performance statement, 20% of recommendations entities had assessed as implemented were assessed by ANAO as not implemented] A minority of entities had effective governance arrangements over implementing ANAO recommendations Additional substantive procedures were required to be undertaken for all other recommendations

  11. Key Learnings Deciding the entity s position and responding clarify the intent of a recommendation agreed or not agreed specify agreed actions (appropriate and achievable which address the identified risk or issue) Implementation plans assign responsibility set timeframes success measures

  12. Key Learnings cont. Monitor and track implementation clear line of sight to implementation progress Review of implementation of recommendations by Audit Committees are timeframes achieved? has the original intent of the recommendation been achieved? is there a process to track and report on ANAO AND parliamentary recommendation actions Report back to JCPAA or the Parliament on implementation

  13. Parliamentary Inquiries Each year there are about six parliamentary inquiries into our performance audit reports Quarterly meetings between the Committee and the ANAO assist in determining which reports are selected JCPAA makes recommendations in reports

  14. Audit Insights Quarterly publication Themes Demonstrate best practise Include examples and links to reports Rapid implementation during early Covid

  15. Questions ?

Related


More Related Content