Important Cases and Overview of Offences Against Human Body Part 2 under Section 299
Explore the significant cases like Mohammed Hossein case, Sumer Singh case, Mansel Pleydell case, and more under Section 299 dealing with culpable homicide amounting to murder. Understand the clauses of Section 300 defining intentional acts causing death or injury likely to cause death, with examples and legal references.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Offences against human body part 2 Cases which is important for section 299
Mohammed hossein case Sumer singh case mansel pleydell case Jammaluddin case Laxman kalu case Mst tulsa case Richpal singh meena Vs.ghosh
Section 300 Section 300deals with the case where culpable homicide is murder. Therefore, an offence cannot ammount to murder if it falls within the definition of culpable homicide. A case of culpable homicide is murder if it falls within anyone of the four clause of section 300. Clause 1-act by which the death caused is done with the intention of causing death.[ r. Venkalu,M.suseelaVs. State of Tamindadu,Namdeo Vs.State of maharastra]
Clause2- with the intention of causing such bodily injury as the offender knows to be likely to cause death- in this clause the mental attitudes of the accused is two fold. First, there is intention to cause bodily harm and secondly there is subjective knowledge that death will be likely consequence of the intended injury. Mst tulsa case, karu malik Vs. State of bihar
Clause 3-injury sufficient in ordinary course of nature to cause death-where a man intentionally inflicts bodily injury sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death, he would be liable for murder. If the probability of death is very great then this third clause fully satisfied. For the application of this clause two point must be satisfied-[1]injury was intentionally inflicted,and[2] injury was sufficient in the ordinary course of nature to cause death of any person.[state of u.p. Vs. Virendra prasad, Dhupa chamar Vs. State of bihar, Rajwant singh case,]
CLAUSE 4-knowledge of imminently dangerous act- this dangerous act is sufficient and probably cause death or cause such bodily injury as likely to cause death. This clause applies to cases of dangerous action without an intention to cause specific bodily injury to any person. Ram prasad case,Nga Ba Tu case,Gorachand Gopee case, Emperor Vs. Dheerajia case is relevant on this point
