
Improving Sustainable Transport: Enabling Enforcement Solutions
Explore the challenges faced by local authorities in promoting sustainable transport, the barriers to enforcement, and case studies showcasing the impact of camera enforcement solutions on traffic management. Learn about the initiatives to boost public transport and address congestion issues effectively.
Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Camera Enforcement as a Service Imperial User Group 22ndApril 2021
Current Situation Local Authorities should encourage sustainable transport methods Motorists feel public transport is slower than driving Bus Companies struggle to meet schedules due to congestion Bus Lanes often ignored by motorist during peak travel times.
Barriers to Enforcement Cost of VCA certified ANPR cameras Additional review officer burden Additional notice processing burden Segregation of duties (Judge and Jury) Fluctuating workloads Bow wave of initial contraventions Staff recruitment & training becoming superfluous
Case Study County Council Traffic impacting the cross-city bus route serving a local Hospital. Further hampered by Covid 19 restrictions on public transport capacity No existing notice processing team
Case Study Two camera locations:
Case Study Statistics: Number of Contraventions Date Total Reviewed Total Rejected Sep-20 6,670 2,481 4,189 Oct-20 2,963 589 2,374 Nov-20 1,652 590 1,062 Dec-20 1,300 521 779 Jan-21 831 474 357 Feb-21 1,325 675 650 Mar-21 2,432 1,534 898 Total 17,173 6864 10,309
Case Study Statistics All Corresp Created Dates Sep-20 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 PCN / NTO PRODUCED WARNING NOTICE PRODUCED CHARGE CERTIFICATE PRODUCED Correspondence Replies Produced 0 1,588 2,487 1,653 493 812 598 1,019 771 6,934 4,094 1,273 662 1,604 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 239 192 322 210 225 46 239 47 124 107 122 39 19 Total (all correspondence sent) 1606 4096 2087 1025 1083 884 1250 932 12963 PCNs Excluding Warning Notices 2,375 1,061 803 457 758 1,002 731 7,187 PCNs Excluding Cancelled 2,227 849 763 434 732 983 731 6,719 Cases with paymentsNo payments (Open Cancelled Recovery Rate cases) 376 165 152 89 151 287 615 1,835 Oct-20 Nov-20 Dec-20 Jan-21 Feb-21 Mar-21 Apr-21 148 212 40 23 26 19 0 468 1,851 684 611 345 581 696 116 4,884 83.12% 80.57% 80.08% 79.49% 79.37% 70.80% 15.87% 72.69% All Issue Dates
Risk Free Model Approved device as a Service Includes: Provision of cameras Full Business Processing Service from Imperial (BPU) Use of Imperial s latest LetterSmarti and ChallengeSmarti Technology Representations drafted by BPU in accordance with Council s policies Council to authorise response for audit purposes Price per PCN subject to site requirements Site survey required before formal quotation All PCN payments banked direct to Council s account Transaction charges invoiced monthly in arrears
p Any questions?