In-Depth Study on Social Dialogue Structures and Interactions
Gain insights from transcribed interviews and preliminary results on the involvement of various sectors in social dialogue, European semester engagement, and more. Discover key findings on transposition of outcomes and sectoral involvement, shedding light on the importance of collective bargaining and collaboration within national and sectoral levels.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
EESDA Interviews SE (70-90min each, transcribed verbatim) Tus General EOs General TU SECTORS EO SECTORS Peak LO x 1 Private SN x 1 Health x 3 Peak Saco x 1 (ED + Healt x 2) Health x 1 ED + Healt x 2 Peak TC0 x 1 Education x 2 Metal x1 Metal x 1 Ed + Health x 1 Commerce x 1 Commerce x 1 Construction ? (Construction x1) Construction x 1 General = 6 (8) Sectoral = 14 SURVEY: we chose not to interview the org answering the survey Overlaps: Some of the sectoral TU/EOS also have other sectors = used 2 times No Thanks : TU in commerce, EO private in ED and Healthcare Forthcoming: State just some Qs (Experts ? New Guideline?)
PRELIMINARY RESULTS INTERVIEWS SE A.1 Presence in social dialogue All except TU in EDU participates regularly Topics varies with sector A.2 Transposition of outcomes Not that much uploading of topics = effectiveness not that high. Implementation not strong since outcomes are below SE standards. (Implementation is through CA sectorally) A.3 European semester involvement Not much involvement (only peak level TU/EO are invited) But some want to know/do more, also on sectoral level.
B.1 Involvement in social dialogue structures All are very involved in social dialogue, regularly both twopartite negotiations and cooperation and tripartite consultation Issues are put forward through CB, in consultation with government and through lobbying/media strategies. All three issue are important also on national level (skills, H&S working cond.) CA is most important output at national level, and in some issues also legal regulation (H&S). Main importance in ESD to defend SE CB-model! No-one wants much of hard regulation from EU.
B.2 Interactions, coalition building and power relations within national/sector level SD structures Trust and continuous joint work in established fora and meetings are important. Civilized and constructive dialogue different views but not much conflict. ALL IN ALL: EU-level SD/SSD is seen as positive, and of increasing improtance but low expectations to change anything in SE and actualy no wish to change anything.
