This detailed report showcases how the QM (Quality Matters) Rubric influenced institutional curriculum revision. It highlights the shift from backward planning to prioritizing standards and developing timelines. The journey includes re-educating administration, needs analysis, aligning learning objectives, and emphasizing assessment alignment. The process culminates in achieving consistency between face-to-face and online courses, ensuring students meet desired learning outcomes.
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
The Buggy Before the Horse How the QM Rubric influenced institutional curriculum revision
What we had Backward plan Isolated standard focus Misunderstandings Missing essential elements
What was needed Re-education of administration Needs analysis Practical plan
Picking the standards Alignment: Critical course elements working together to ensure that students achieve the desired learning outcomes (QM Rubric, 2014, p. 6). General Standard 2 Learning objectives or competencies describe what learners will be able to do upon completion of the course (QM Rubric, 2014, p. 12). General Standard 3 3.1- The assessments measure the stated learning objectives or competencies (QM Rubric, 2014, p. 16).
Developing Timelines Standard 2 One year/ 3 faculty in-service days (2014-2015) Standard 3 One year/3 faculty in-service days (2015-2016)
Into the Future Apply standards 4-6 (2016) Completes f2f course revision Apply the QM rubric comprehensively to online courses (Standards 1-8) (2017) Bulk of standards 2-6 completed previously at this point
Alignment Consistency between f2f and online courses The Horse & Buggy are aligned!!
