Insights into Forecasted Load Levels and Trends in the Electricity Sector

load forecast review 2019 rtp n.w
1 / 15
Embed
Share

Discover detailed analyses and projections of load forecast reviews, agenda items, and SSWG load data in the electricity sector. Explore forecasts for different regions, years, and scenarios, along with comparisons to ERCOT data. Gain valuable insights into load levels, potential losses, and self-served load considerations that can inform future energy planning decisions.

  • Analytics
  • Electricity Sector
  • Load Forecast
  • Energy Planning
  • Data Analysis

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Load Forecast Review 2019 RTP January 2019 RPG

  2. Agenda Load review per PG 3.1.7 Next Steps PUBLIC 2

  3. Load forecast (MW) SSWG Load Based on 18 SSWG cases dated 10/10/2018 less self-served load North Central South Central NCP Total Year Coast East Far West North Southern West 2020 24,008 2,873 5,653 1,630 25,165 13,268 6,334 2,195 81,126 2021 24,437 2,885 6,050 2,055 25,543 13,545 6,972 2,210 83,698 2022 24,617 2,903 6,261 2,064 25,872 13,802 7,464 2,221 85,203 2023 24,768 2,941 6,404 2,069 26,272 14,010 7,822 2,237 86,523 2024 24,909 2,966 6,510 2,083 26,648 14,074 7,943 2,244 87,379 2025 25,089 3,002 6,625 2,100 27,061 14,440 8,042 2,267 88,627 90th percentile Load Forecast less losses North Central South Central NCP Total Year Coast East Far West North Southern West 2020 22,210 2,828 4,249 1,755 26,430 13,424 6,155 2,220 79,270 2021 22,695 2,850 4,510 2,218 26,719 13,658 6,325 2,277 81,253 2022 23,186 2,881 4,772 2,226 27,022 13,906 6,505 2,339 82,838 2023 23,679 2,907 5,034 2,234 27,330 14,156 6,694 2,403 84,437 2024 24,167 2,932 5,289 2,243 27,633 14,399 6,879 2,464 86,005 2025 24,652 2,956 5,545 2,251 27,935 14,639 7,066 2,525 87,569 PUBLIC 3

  4. Load forecast: 2019 RTP load level less self-served and losses preliminary (MW) North Central South Central Year Coast East Far West North Southern West Total 2020 23,321 2,873 4,568 1,755 26,430 13,424 6,334 2,220 80,924 2021 23,830 2,885 4,848 2,218 26,719 13,658 6,642 2,277 83,077 2022 24,345 2,903 5,130 2,226 27,022 13,906 6,831 2,339 84,702 2023 24,768 2,941 5,412 2,234 27,330 14,156 7,028 2,403 86,272 2024 24,909 2,966 5,685 2,243 27,633 14,399 7,223 2,464 87,522 2025 25,089 3,002 5,961 2,251 27,935 14,639 7,419 2,525 88,821 Bounded (based on 5% threshold, Far West based on 7.5% threshold) 90th percentile SSWG Forecast PUBLIC 4

  5. SSWG load v/s ERCOT 90/10 (less losses and self served) PUBLIC 5

  6. SSWG load v/s ERCOT 90/10 (less losses and self served) PUBLIC 6

  7. 2019 Load review Preliminary start cases with the proposed load levels have been posted on MIS Secure (no case conditioning steps were applied) Grid>Regional Planning>Regional Transmission Planning>2019 Regional Transmission Plan Postings TSPs are requested to review these and provide feedback on the initial draft TSPs may choose to accept the load forecast, or TSPs may choose to provide additional justification for cases where the proposed levels are not consistent with their expectations PUBLIC 7

  8. Load review: Schedule Key dates: January 11, 2019: A preview case with scaled loads based on the bounded methodology posted by ERCOT. RTP preliminary load by weather zone shared with TSPs. January 31, 2019: TSPs either approve or provide necessary documentation supporting additional loads. No response from TSP inferred as No Comments . February 15, 2019: ERCOT completes load review and RTP load level finalized. February 28, 2019: TSPs submit IDEVs to ERCOT to reflect the load review results. PUBLIC 8

  9. Next steps TPs and TOs to provide feedback on proposed load level (by January 31 2019) Feedback provided to Calvin Opheim (Calvin.Opheim@ercot.com) Sandeep Borkar (Sandeep.Borkar@ercot.com) Ping Yan (Ping.Yan@ercot.com) ERCOT to complete Load Review and finalize RTP load levels (by February 15, 2019) PUBLIC 9

  10. Questions Sandeep Borkar Sandeep.Borkar@ercot.com 512-248-6642 Ping Yan Ping.Yan@ercot.com 512-248-4153 Calvin Opheim Calvin.Opheim@ercot.com 512-248-3944 PUBLIC 10

  11. Appendix PUBLIC 11

  12. References PG 317 TAC presentation (http://www.ercot.com/content/wcm/key_document s_lists/107880/PG_317_LoadThreshold_rev.pptx) PG 317 RPG presentation (Aug 2017) (http://www.ercot.com/content/wcm/key_document s_lists/108880/Load_Forecast_Review.pptx) PUBLIC 12

  13. Bounded higher-of methodology (x=7.5% for Far West and x=5% for others) SSWG Loads Calculated by Weather Zone Remove self- served loads Compare weather zone load levels WZ load from SSWG < ERCOT 90th Percentile Use ERCO 90th (add self-served) Y N Use ERCOT 90th + X% (add self- served and justified additions) ERCOT 90th percentile summer peak load forecast by Weather Zone Remove Losses and add any known differences WZ load from SSWG > ERCOT 90th + X% Y N Use SSWG Loads Load share for each TO within the weather zone is determined based on that TO s share of the most recent summer peak. Loads for TO s inside this WZ, but within the X% bounds would be retained from SSWG cases. PUBLIC 13

  14. Load review process Develop RTP start cases using the bounded higher-of load level TAC/Board approves the X% bound for RTP Load level Post preliminary RTP start cases for review Stakeholder review passed? RTP start case load levels finalized Y N ERCOT staff to review the rationale and update RPG on any changes to load levels Stakeholder provides rationale for valid differences Rationale: Historic load growth Committed load additions Forecast methodology Past forecast performance Special circumstances Other? Preliminary RTP start cases will be shared to allow TDSPs to review the impact of load distribution on pockets within the weather zones. PUBLIC 14

  15. Load forecast: 2019 RTP load level (with self-served) preliminary (MW) North Central South Central Year Coast East Far West North Southern West Total 2020 27,273 2,916 4,568 1,755 26,430 13,424 6,840 2,332 85,538 2021 27,783 2,928 4,848 2,218 26,719 13,658 7,006 2,390 87,550 2022 28,299 2,946 5,130 2,226 27,022 13,906 7,195 2,452 89,176 2023 28,724 2,984 5,412 2,234 27,330 14,156 7,393 2,515 90,748 2024 28,867 3,009 5,685 2,243 27,633 14,399 7,588 2,577 92,000 2025 29,048 3,045 5,961 2,251 27,935 14,639 7,927 2,637 93,442 Bounded (based on 5% threshold, Far West based on 7.5% threshold) 90th percentile SSWG Forecast PUBLIC 15

Related


More Related Content