Interconnection Discussion Forum Highlights and Case Study

double jeopardy interconnection discussion forum n.w

1 / 4

Embed Share

Explore a case study on mishandled project issues in the Interconnection Discussion Forum, focusing on when initial reviews should be binding and under what circumstances changes are allowed. Learn from a real-world example and insights from industry experts.

brennank Follow

Uploaded on Apr 29, 2025 | 0 Views

Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

Download Presentation

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

Double Jeopardy Interconnection Discussion Forum October 14, 2020

Rule 21 Working Group 3 Issue D When should the Commission consider results of an initial review or detailed study to be binding? Under what circumstances should the Commission allow the results to be changed? No recommendation after all parties agreed projects should never be re-reviewed.

Mishandled Project Example Jan 2019: Customer received engineering review results from PG&E stating, This project passed Engineering and does not require mitigation work. Spring 2020: Installation completed. May 2020: After reviewing the IA, PG&E stated, Upon re-reviewing the project, it was determined that a transformer upgrade would be required. PG&E informed the contractor that the only way to proceed is for the customer to pay for the upgrade and then file a financial claim. June 2020: Energy Division stated, it sounds like the utility has informed the customer of the process to get reimbursed. Aug 2020: PG&E decided to absorb the cost and issued PTO.