Intuitionism
Intuitionism as an ethical language presents strengths such as belief in objective moral norms and intuitive morality, contrasting with challenges related to defining moral terms and relying on intuition. Explore the essence of Intuitionism, its key points, and the debate surrounding it within ethical philosophy.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Intuitionism Explore and Evaluate the strengths and problems of Intuitionism as ethical language
What do remember of the 3 criticism of Naturalism? To avoid these criticisms, Moore argues for a non-naturalist position instead. What is non-naturalism?
Background Bentham, Mill, Kant and Aristotle are all ethical naturalists because they all argued that value statements can be defined in terms of factual statements. G.E. Moore denies the possibility of this because of the fact-value problem. The naturalistic fallacy led to the dominance of meta-ethics in the 20thcentury as attempted responses to the problem began to develop, namely, intuitionism, emotivism and prescriptivism
Background continued These responses tend to fall into two camps: Moral Realism (cognitivism) which asserts that moral claims are making reference to facts about the world. E.g. in the same way as saying it is raining, the statement, killing someone is wrong is stating a fact of the matter. Moral Anti-Realism (non cognitivism) says that certain statements are not referring to the world at all and so are not capable of being true or false in any real sense. There are no moral facts, and therefore, no moral knowledge.
Intuitionism Task Read pages 104-5 Highlight the key points about theory (3 5) Discuss in pairs and try to work out what is Intuitionism ? Select the key strengths and weaknesses, annotating your comments about
Intuitionism Intuitionists believe that moral norms have an objective existence that is independent of human experience. Morality is intuitive. Intuitionists believe that you cannot define words like good . We simply know something is good because out intuition tells us it is good. Intuitionism does not mean that all moral decisions are reached by relying on intuition, but that it enables people to know basic moral truths so that they are able to make ethical decisions.
So.. What do we mean by Intuitions? Not worked out from evidence, we just have to think about it. Incapable of proof. Self-evidently true. Not 6thsense more like maths / logic
Intuitionism The philosopher G.E. Moore criticised naturalism. Instead he said we have an infallible intuitive knowledge of good things. e.g. I don t need to observe a murder to know that killing someone is wrong I just know it is. In answer to the question, what is good? Moore tells us that, in fact, it cannot be defined, but is known intuitively.
So what does Moore think? Some things are intrinsically valuable, and we should strive towards them (ideals) Moore identifies love of friendship and beauty as two of the most important. These values are known through intuition. We must consider our actions in terms of consequences: whether they promote these goods or damage them.
Simple v Complex Moore argued that there are simple and complex ideas. Complex = horse can be broken down into animal, mammal, quadruped, equine. Simple = yellow we can t break it down any further. Moral terms are simple. The word good is indefinable and un-analysable because it is simple and the concept cannot be broken down further. Known by intuition Can t define Self evident
The Open-Question Argument What if, for example, you define good as pleasure? That is, good is reduced to (means exactly the same things as) pleasure. But if I was then to ask you, I get pleasure poisoning the water system, but is it good? then all I am really saying is, I get pleasure from poisoning the water system, but is it pleasure? My first question seems to be a valid moral question, whereas the latter question makes no sense at all.
The Open-Question Argument Cont Put in Moore s terms, my first question is an open question because it makes moral sense to ask it, whereas the latter formulation of the question is a closed question and, in fact, isn t a question at all. Therefore, good and pleasure cannot mean the same thing! This led Moore to conclude that good cannot be defined by non- ethical terms: Simply put, good is good! If good cannot be defined in terms of any natural property it means that good is a mysterious thing indeed. How are we to be aware of goodness if we cannot define it? This is why Moore s theory is known as intuitionism. We intuit goodness.
What is Naturalistic fallacy? What is Naturalistic fallacy? Against naturalism. Good and bad are not natural properties. You cant verify moral statements. You can have open questions.
Moral judgements cannot be proven So, Moore argues that moral judgements cannot be proven empirically. We cannot observe pleasure and then say that goodness is pleasure. Ross listed the following as prima facie duties: Keeping a promise, reparation for harm done, gratitude, justice, beneficence, self- improvement and non- maleficence He acknowledged that this list might not be complete. W.D. Ross accepted Moore s version of ethics and also added that in any given situation moral duties or obligations become apparent. These are called prima facie duties. Prima facie means at first appearance These principles emphasise a personal character of duty rather than one set on certain absolutes.
What are the Strengths and Weaknesses of intuitionism? What are the Strengths and Weaknesses of intuitionism? Read page104 Read page104- -5 5 Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Intuitionism Assess the strengths and weaknesses of Intuitionism Strengths Intuitionism allows for objective moral values to be identified, and therefore proposes a form of moral realism. It is not a question of dismissing the possibility of any moral facts. It doesn t propose a subjective or emotive approach to ethics but it does avoid the problems of identifying ethics with a natural property. Intuitionism allows for moral duties and obligations, and so satisfies a moral absolutist. Intuition may be associated with the idea of conscience as a moral guide. Problems with Intuitionism People do intuit and reason to different conclusions and there is no obvious way to resolve their differences. How can we be sure that our intuitions are correct? Is it a gut feeling? Is it God s direction? It may be considered to be meaningless concept, since it is non-verifiable.
Explain the role of Intuition in Meta-Ethics according to Moore.
Summary G. E. Moore asserted that moral judgements are based on infallible intuitive knowledge of good things. Good is indefinable. Good is a simple idea like yellow . The naturalistic fallacy is to define an ethical judgement as factual. Moore argued that you can t use non-moral premise to establish a moral conclusion. Moore asserted many things about good and its indefinability, but he didn t prove his own case. Ross developed prima facie duties in a moral dilemma, the various duties or obligations that we have are apparent. In making moral decision, our intuition identifies our prima facie duties, although our actual action isn t self-evident. He differentiated between things that are right to do and things that are good to do depending on our motivation or intention.
