Kentucky Child Fatality Panel 2021 Review and Findings

kentucky child fatality and near fatality n.w
1 / 21
Embed
Share

The Kentucky Child Fatality Panel's annual review for 2021 highlighted areas of improvement needed in reporting, data analysis, and adherence to statutory requirements, with recommendations for better alignment between findings and recommendations. The panel aims to enhance its processes for analyzing case data and finalizing annual reports to better serve its purpose within the Justice Cabinet.

  • Kentucky
  • Child Fatality
  • Panel Review
  • Statutory Compliance
  • Data Analysis

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Kentucky Child Fatality And Near Fatality External Review Panel 2021 Update Legislative Oversight and Investigations Committee October 14, 2021 1

  2. LOIC Annual Reviews: 2014-2020 Summary Focus of the initial 2014 evaluation: Panel organization and autonomy Procedures for reviewing case files Handling of confidential information Statutory compliance Budget and staffing Other states and national trends 2

  3. 2021 Annual Evaluation Major Objectives Review the processes by which DCBS sends case information to the panel the panel analyzes case data the panel drafts and finalizes its annual reports Evaluate the panel s organizational placement within the Justice Cabinet. Review best practices from the National Center for Fatality Review and Prevention 3

  4. 2021 Annual Evaluation Major Conclusions Panel s annual reports met statutory requirements. Findings and recommendations are not presented effectively in the panel s annual reports. Panel does not have a data dictionary to clearly define variables from case files. Panel and JPSC have not followed the procedures outlines in a May 2014 memorandum of understanding (MOU). 4

  5. Finding Area 1: Panel s Annual Reports and Data Analysis KRS 620.055(6) grants the panel broad authority to request information and records. Panel has met statutory requirements related to annual reports. Panel s case review process may need improvement. 5

  6. Finding Area 1: Panel s Annual Reports and Data Analysis Staff review of the panel s findings shows: 49 percent based on data discussed in report, 15 percent did not appear to be based on data presented in the report, 36 percent were unclear whether data analysis was used. 6

  7. Finding Area 1: Panel s Annual Reports and Data Analysis Staff review shows an inconsistent link between the panel s recommendations and findings. Recommendations are not consistently targeted or actionable. The National Center for Fatality Review and Prevention may be a valuable resource for the panel. 7

  8. Recommendation 3.1 (Page 28) The Child Fatality and Near Fatality External Review Panel should reevaluate how it uses SharePoint and its data tool to collect and analyze case data that are used to make case determinations, findings, and recommendations for system and process improvements. (continued) 8

  9. Recommendation 3.1 (continued) It should also consider contacting the National Center for Fatality Review and Prevention to discuss how best to develop recommendations related to its review of child fatalities and near fatalities where abuse or neglect is suspected. 9

  10. Finding Area 2: Data Tool and Data Dictionary Data tool has not been formally evaluated since its 2014 inception. Over-reliance on use of narratives No data dictionary. 10

  11. Finding Area 2: Data Dictionary/Data Tool Improvements The National Center for Fatality Review and Prevention sets the national standard for fatality review Web-based case reporting tool Extensive data dictionary 11

  12. Recommendation 3.2 (Page 37) The Child Fatality and Near Fatality External Review Panel should formally review its data tool to ensure that it is capturing relevant data needed to make case determinations and to develop findings and actionable recommendations. 12

  13. Recommendation 3.3 (Page 37) The Child Fatality and Near Fatality External Review Panel should consider creating a data dictionary. 13

  14. Recommendation 3.4 (Page 37) The Child Fatality and Near Fatality External Review Panel should consider requesting assistance from the National Center for Fatality Review and Prevention to understand how it designed its data tool and data dictionary. The center may also be able to assist with ideas about different types of data for the panel to capture related to the review of near fatality cases where abuse or neglect is suspected. 14

  15. Finding Area 3: Budget Process Panel is attached to the Justice Cabinet (KRS 620.055(1)). Panel and cabinet have not followed budget procedures outlined in 2014 MOU. Diminished ability to address staff and workload issues through budget process. 15

  16. Finding Area 3: Panel Expenditures 2015-2021 Personnel Expenditures Expenditures $212,582 267,004 213,259 141,943 185,345 275,117 245,261 $1,540,511 $104,431 Source: eMARS, Expenditure Analysis Report-FAS3 Operating Fiscal Year 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 Total Total Expenditures $219,528 288,202 269,547 149,614 188,955 281,628 247,467 $1,644,942 $6,946 21,198 56,289 7,671 3,611 6,511 2,206 16

  17. Recommendation 3.5 (Page 41) The Child Fatality and Near Fatality External Review Panel and the Justice and Public Safety Cabinet should develop processes to ensure that the panel submits a formal budget request to the cabinet in the fall prior to the budget session, as envisioned by the 2014 MOU (section 4). (continued) 17

  18. Recommendation 3.5 (continued) Such a process should involve developing an appropriate format for the panel to use when preparing the budget and for the cabinet to use when submitting the budget to the Office of the State Budget Director (OSBD). The process should include steps to ensure that the panel can formally present its personnel and operating requests to OSBD, as well as to the legislature. 18

  19. Recommendation 3.6 (Page 41) The Child Fatality and Near Fatality External Review Panel and the Justice and Public Safety Cabinet should develop processes for meaningful communication between the panel chair and the cabinet secretary or the cabinet secretary s designee related to the panel s budgetary needs as envisioned by the 2014 MOU (section 3). (continued) 19

  20. Recommendation 3.6 (continued) Such processes should include steps by which panel expenditures are approved and staffing requests are formally considered, as well as the presentation of financial reports or updates to the panel. 20

  21. Recommendation 3.7 (Page 41) The Child Fatality and Near Fatality External Review Panel and the Justice and Public Safety Cabinet should discuss with the Office of State Budget Director the possibility of establishing a separate appropriation allotment as is done for other similarly funded programs under Justice Administration. 21

Related


More Related Content