League of Nations Weapons for Conflict Resolution
Explore the League of Nations' arsenal of weapons for resolving conflicts between nations, including diplomatic strategies, the Conference of Ambassadors, and major border disputes in the 1920s. Evaluate the League's success in dealing with international disputes and understand the key factors influencing its effectiveness.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Recap: What weapons did the League of Nations have at their disposal to solve conflicts between nations?
Topic 2: The League of Nations Lesson 13: How successfully did the LON deal with international disputes in the 1920 s ? Know the main disputes of the 1920s that the LON had to respond to Understand how the LON reacted to each dispute Be able to evaluate the success of the LON in dealing with these disputes in the 1920s
The Conference of Ambassadors 1. The peace treaties created new countries and changed borders of others 2. Putting a dotted line on a map was easier than working out where the boundaries lay on the ground 3. There were disputes and the League had to sort it out but it had too much to do. Therefore the Conference of Ambassadors was set up to hear disputes 4. It was NOT a body of the League of Nations but was made up of leading politicians from the main members of the League Britain, France & Italy 5. It was closely linked to the League
Major Border Disputes 1. Vilna, 1920 2. Upper Silesia, 1921-25 3. Aaland Islands, 1921 4. Corfu, 1923 5. Bulgaria, 1925
L/O: Be able to evaluate the success of the League of Nations in dealing with international disputes in the 1920s. Use pages 34-37 in the text book to complete. Ask for a shortened version of events if needed Y axis- measure extent of success For each event provide a BRIEF description of the dispute and how the League responded X axis-key disputes in the 1920s
L/O: Understand how the LON reacted to each dispute Give an example of when the League of Nations used the following methods to solve problems: a) Overpowering smaller countries b)Using the power of leading members such as Britain and France c) Use of experts to investigate an issue Which was the biggest cause of the League of Nations failing to solve disputes: lack of its own army or being governed by powerful members who acted out of self- interest?
Homework Complete cartoon analysis of conflict between Bulgaria and Greece Due in .
