Legislative Water Commission Update and Recommendations

legislative water commission february 11 2019 n.w
1 / 26
Embed
Share

Stay informed about the latest developments from the Legislative Water Commission's February 11, 2019 meeting. Discover the agenda items discussed, the statutory duties of the commission, the appointed members, recommendations made, and the pathway to these recommendations. The commission is actively reviewing reports, gathering data, and making recommendations to assist in water-related legislation as well as coordinating with other relevant bodies.

  • Water Commission
  • Legislation
  • Recommendations
  • Updates
  • Statutory Duties

Uploaded on | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author. If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. LEGISLATIVE WATER COMMISSION FEBRUARY 11, 2019 Co-Chairs: Representative Paul Torkelson Senator Chuck Wiger (Presiding) Jim Stark, Director

  2. AGENDA Approval of Minutes November 13 & December 10, 2018 Welcome to new appointees: Senator Chris Eaton, Representative Jeff Brand, Representative Josh Heintzeman, and Representative Todd Lippert Update: Section 404, Clean Water Act: Les, Lemm, David Weirens (BWSR) Drainage Working Group Consensus Recommendations Al Kean (BWSR) Summary of Commission Recommendations (Jim Stark, Director, LWC) Status of Meetings with Legislative Leaders Discussion: Next steps for draft bills Status of other introduced water legislation, as time allows Scheduling meetings during session Adjourn

  3. LWC STATUTORY DUTIES REVIEWS AGENCY WATER POLICY REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS GATHERS DATA AND COMMENTS RECOMMENDATIONS TO ASSIST WITH LEGISLATION SHARES DATA AND INFORMATION WITH LCCMR, CWC, AND LEGISLATIVE STANDING COMMITTEES COORDINATES

  4. 12 APPOINTED MEMBERS SEN. PAUL ANDERSON (R) REP. JEFF BRAND SEN. RICH DRAHEIM SEN. CHRIS EATON SEN. KENT EKEN REP. PETER FISCHER REP. JOSH HEINTZEMAN (R) REP. TODD LIPPERT REP. JOHN POSTON REP. PAUL TORKELSON (R) SEN. BILL WEBER SEN. CHUCK WIGER DISTRICT 44 DISTRICT 19A FROM PLYMOUTH FROM ST. PETER FROM MADISON LAKE FROM BROOKLYN CENTER FROM TWIN VALLEY FROM MAPLEWOOD FROM NISSWA FROM NORTHFIELD FROM LAKE SHORE FROM HANSKA FROM LUVERNE FROM MAPLEWOOD (DFL) (R) (DFL) (DFL) (DFL) DISTRICT 40 DISTRICT 4 DISTRICT 43A DISTRICT 10A DISTRICT 20B DISTRICT 9A DISTRICT 16B DISTRICT 22 DISTRICT 43 (DFL) (R) (R) (DFL)

  5. 13 RECOMMENDATIONS 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. EXPANDED SOURCE WATER PROGRAM 11. INCREASE DRINKING WATER PROTECTION FEE 12. STATEWIDE WATER POLICY 13. EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM WATER K-12 INFLOW AND INFILTRATION WASTEWATER HEALTHY SOIL/HEALTHY WATER WATER INFRASTRUCTURE PEER REVIEW OF WASTEWATER STANDARDS REDUCING EXCESS CHLORIDE CONTINUATION OF THE LEGISLATIVE WATER COMMISSION KEEPING WATER ON THE LAND DATA, INFORMATION, EDUCATION, AND PUBLIC AWARENESS PRESERVING AND PROTECTING OUR LAKES

  6. PATHWAY TO RECOMMENDATIONS STEP 1. REVIEW OF REPORTS AND EXISTING COMMENDATIONS STEP 2. FIVE STAKEHOLDER MEETINGS 6 ISSUES/100 RECOMMENDATIONS STEP 3. SURVEY FOLLOW-UP 188/450 RESPONSES STEP 4. RANKING RECOMMENDATIONS

  7. 13 RECOMMENDATIONS (2) (NOT IN PRIORITY ORDER) 1. Expanded source water programs 2. Reducing excess chloride 3. Data, information, education, and public awareness 4. Increase drinking water protection fee 5. Keeping water on the land 6. Inflow and infiltration wastewater 7. Continuation of the LWC 8. Healthy soil/healthy water 9. K-12 water education 10. Preserving and protecting our lakes 11. Peer review of wastewater standards 12. Water infrastructure 13. Statewide water policy

  8. RECOMMENDATIONS BASED ON: REVIEW OF REPORTS AND PREVIOUS RECOMMENDATIONS LWC MEMBER DISCUSSIONS DISCUSSIONS WITH AGENCIES STAKEHOLDERS WORKSHOPS BROAD SURVEY PF STAKEHOLDER COMMUNITY CONSENSUS RECOMMENDATIONS BY LEGISLATIVE WATER COMMISSION

  9. RECOMMENDATIONS FOCUS ON THESE GOALS: CLEAN AND SUSTAINABLE DRINKING WATER PROTECTING AND IMPROVING WATER PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE

  10. RECOMMENDATIONS: REPRESENT STATEWIDE WATER PRIORITIES ARE BI-PARTISAN IN NATURE FOCUS ON INCENTIVES RATHER THAN REGULATIONS BUILD ON MINOR CHANGES TO AGENCY PROGRAMS PRESENT MINOR BUDGETARY IMPACT FOCUS ON FIRST-STEPS AND PILOT PROGRAMS MAY LEAD TO AGENCY PROGRAM ENHANCEMENTS SOME REQUIRE EMPHASIS ON LONG-TERM ISSUES

  11. RECOMMENDATIONS MAY BE USED FOR: LEGISLATIVE FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS SUPPORT FOR PROPOSED STAKEHOLDER BILLS FUNDING RECOMMENDATIONS FOR AGENCIES SUPPORT FOR AGENCY PROGRAMS

  12. RECOMMENDATION SUMMARY 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. EXPANDED SOURCE WATER PROGRAM 11. INCREASE DRINKING WATER PROTECTION FEE 12. STATEWIDE WATER POLICY 13. EDUCATIONAL CURRICULUM WATER K-12 INFLOW AND INFILTRATION WASTEWATER HEALTHY SOIL/HEALTHY WATER WATER INFRASTRUCTURE PEER REVIEW OF WASTEWATER STANDARDS REDUCING EXCESS CHLORIDE CONTINUATION OF THE LEGISLATIVE WATER COMMISSION KEEPING WATER ON THE LAND DATA, INFORMATION, EDUCATION, AND PUBLIC AWARENESS PRESERVING AND PROTECTING OUR LAKES

  13. 1) EXPAND SOURCE WATER PROTECTION WHY? PRIVATE WELLS AND RIVERS THAT PROVIDE DRINKING WATER NEED TO BE PROTECTED WHAT S NEEDED? LEGISLATION FOR MONITORING AND PROTECTION MEASURES

  14. 2) REDUCING EXCESS CHLORIDE IN OUR WATERS WHY? WE OVERUSE DE-ICERS/IMPAIR OUR WATERS WHAT S NEEDED? BILL FOR TRAINING AND FOR LIMITS ON LIABILITY FOR TRAINED APPLICATORS

  15. 3) WATER SUSTAINABILITY GOAL: PROVIDE CLEAN AND SUSTAINABLE GROUNDWATER WHY? ADEQUATE WATER IS NEEDED FOR DRINKING AND TO SUPPORT LAKES AND STREAMS WHAT S NEEDED: FUNDS FOR MONITORING, ASSESSMENT, AND PLANNING

  16. 4) INCREASE DRINKING WATER PROTECTION FEE OUTCOME: UPDATE MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH DRINKING CONNECTION FEE WHY? FEES PROTECT SAFE DRINKING WATER WHAT S NEEDED: BILL TO INCREASE FEE

  17. 5) WATER RETENTION KEEPING WATER ON THE LAND OUTCOME: KEEP MORE WATER ON THE LAND WHY? WATER RETENTION IMPROVES AGRICULTURE AND WATER WHAT S NEEDED: BILL TO SUPPORT THE IMPORTANT AGRICULTURAL PRACTICES

  18. 6) INFLOW AND INFILTRATION OUTCOME: FIX OUR LEAKING SEWERS WHY? LEAKS INCREASE TREATMENT COSTS AND IMPAIR WATER WHAT S NEEDED: BILL ALLOWING RESOURCES TO BE USED BY SANITARY DISTRICTS

  19. 7) CONTINUATION OF THE LEGISLATIVE WATER COMMISSION OUTCOME: CONTINUATION OF THE COMMISSION WHY? WATER IS VITAL THE LEGISLATURE NEEDS TO BE INFORMED WHAT S NEEDED: BILL TO CONTINUE THE COMMISSION

  20. 8) HEALTHY SOIL/HEALTHY WATER OUTCOME: PROMOTE HEALTHY SOIL/HEALTHY WATER WHY? HEALTHY SOIL PROVIDES BENEFITS FOR AGRICULTURE AND WATER WHAT S NEEDED: BILL TO PROVIDE PLANNING, OUTREACH, AND RESEARCH

  21. 9) K-12 WATER EDUCATION OUTCOME: INCREASE WATER EDUCATION WHY? IT IS CURRENTLY NOT ADEQUATE WHAT S NEEDED: BILL TO CONNECT TEACHERS WITH EXPERTS

  22. 10) PRESERVING AND PROTECTING MINNESOTAS LAKES OUTCOME: PROTECT AND PRESERVE OUR LAKES WHY? LAKES ARE IMPORTANT AND THREATENED RESOURCES WHAT S NEEDED: FUNDS FOR A PRESERVATION PLAN, AS A FIRST STEP

  23. 11. PEER REVIEW OF WASTEWATER STANDARDS OUTCOME: PEER REVIEW OF WATER QUALITY STANDARDS WHY? ENSURES SCIENTIFIC AND PUBLIC COMMENT WHAT S NEEDED: BILL TO MEMORIALIZE CURRENT MPCA PRACTICE INTO STATUTE

  24. 12) WATER INFRASTRUCTURE (WASTE, STORM, AND DRINKING WATER) OUTCOME: ADDRESS AGING AND FAILING WATER INFRASTRUCTURE WHY? OUR WATER INFRASTRUCTURE IS OLD AND IS FAILING WHAT S NEEDED: FUNDING AND SUPPORT FOR FACILITIES UPGRADES AND MANAGEMENT

  25. 13. STATE WATER POLICY: PLAN FOR AN UNCERTAIN FUTURE OUTCOME: PLAN FOR AN UNCERTAIN FUTURE WHY? AS A STATE, WE NEED TO PLAN TO MITIGATE AND HARDEN INFRASTRUCTURE WHAT S NEEDED: DIRECTION TO PREPARE A PLAN, AS A FIRST STEP

  26. RECOMMENDATIONS: PROGRESS AND NEXT STEPS MEETINGS WITH COMMITTEE LEADERS DISCUSSIONS WITH AGENCY STAFF DRAFT BILLS BILL SPONSORS DISCUSSION

Related


More Related Content