Literature Synthesis: Making Informed Clinical Decisions

Literature Synthesis: Making Informed Clinical Decisions
Slide Note
Embed
Share

Combining elements to form a whole, literature synthesis helps in judging similarities and differences, strengths, weaknesses, and gaps to create evidence-based practice recommendations. Understand the process from critiquing literature to implementing and evaluating practice changes using approaches like the Iowa Model. Learn the significance of systematic reviews, literature reviews, and annotated bibliographies in deriving valuable insights. Discover the essence of quality, quantity, and consistency in making clinical decisions based on evidence.

  • Literature synthesis
  • Clinical decisions
  • Evidence-based practice
  • Iowa Model
  • Systematic reviews

Uploaded on Feb 23, 2025 | 0 Views


Download Presentation

Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.

The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Debra D. Mark, PhD, RN, FAAN debramar@hawaii.edu

  2. Objectives Discuss issues when critiquing the literature Discuss approaches for making clinical decisions based on the evidence Design evidence-based practice recommendations for your EBP Project

  3. From Problems to Practice Recommendations The Iowa Model Formulate a well-written PICO Find the evidence Critique the evidence Synthesize the evidence Develop a practice recommendation Pilot the Practice Change Implement the Practice Change Evaluate the Practice Change 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7.

  4. Other Literature Summaries Systematic Review Answers a single research question Uses RCTs only Defines databases & keywords Predetermined inclusion criteria i.e., age, gender, etc. Literature Review Explores a body of literature Minimal focus on level of evidence No inclusion criteria Annotated Bibliography Series of abstracts

  5. is a Literature Synthesis?

  6. Literature Synthesis Definition: Combine separate elements to form a whole Thesis-driven Purpose: Judgments about similarities and differences: Independent variables Dependent variables Population Clinical problem Determine strengths, weaknesses, limitations, gaps For EBP: Includes level of evidence

  7. Am I Ready to Synthesize?

  8. When Youve: Exhausted the literature Know (really know) the state of the science Take a birds-eye view Ask yourself: What is the literature telling me to do? (that s different from what we re doing now)

  9. Base Clinical Decisions On: Quality, quantity & consistency of findings Level of evidence Volume of studies w/similar sample characteristics Consistency among evidence from all sources Feasibility for practice Relevance of research findings for practice Individual patient circumstances, values, preferences Other Risk/benefit ratio Titler, M.G. & Schmitt, M. (2001). Evidence-Based Practice Web-based course. http://www.nursing.uiowa.edu/sites/users/Gardery/ebp/

  10. Tips for Success Conduct thorough search for evidence Carefully critique the evidence Practice recommendations are not easy to make. Consider Organizational culture Patient values Provider tolerances Don t wallow in the literature (M. Titler)

  11. Not Enough Evidence? Seek help from a librarian Use lower levels of evidence Consult experts Consider conducting research, prn Greenhalgh, T., Robert, G., MacFarlane, F., Bate, P., & Kyriakidou, O. (2004). Diffusion of innovation in service organizations: systematic review and recommendations. Millbank Quarterly, 82(4), 581-629.

  12. Do I Write a Literature Syntheis?

  13. The Matrix Method

  14. Put it Together in One Place Excel! One article per row Allows for sorting by: Date Author Level of evidence Etc. See the big picture Identify common themes

  15. Organize by Sub-Topics: Sexuality Altered Body Image Dyspareunia Erectile Dysfunction Infertility Libido

  16. Start with Search Method Search Strategy Keywords (Key concepts) Limits i.e. Years Searched Databases (Resources) Number of articles critiqued: ## Critique method: How many reviewers per article Blind review Grading Criteria: Mosby s, USPSTF, etc.

  17. Example A literature search of PubMed and CINAHL databases was conducted and 38 articles dating from 2000 to 2013 were critiqued using Mosby levels of evidence (see Figure 1). Search terms included glycemic control, hyperglycemia, postoperative SSIs, and joint replacement surgeries. Perioperative Hyperglycemia Management Literature Critique 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 I II III IV V VI VII Other

  18. What Did You Find? Write one or more synthesis statements Start with each subtopic/worksheet

  19. Example # 1: Hyperglycemia Mgt Hyperglycemia management reduces surgical site infections (SSI) regardless of a pre-existing history of diabetes, especially in the first 48 hours post-op Recommend blood glucose (BG) level screening prior to elective surgery. Ideal targets are: A pre-meal BG level < 110 mg/dL A post-prandial BG level < 180 mg/dL Delay surgery until BG is at an acceptable level Sliding scale insulin is not effective Conflicting evidence whether Hgb A1C is an indicator for increased risk of SSI

  20. Example # 2: Phlebitis A number of studies have found that the incidence of phlebitis is directly related to the method of administering intravenous infusions (Dayton, 1998, Level II; Stainback, 1996, Level III; Whitman & Coxe, 1997, Level I).

  21. Example # 3: Post-op GI Assessment Return of motility sequence: small intestine, stomach, colon (Hotokezaka, et al., 1996; Livingston & Passaro, 1990; Schippers, et al., 1991) Monitoring bowel sounds does not serve to indicate recovery of motility s/p abdominal surgery patients (Huge et al., 2000) Primary markers of return of GI motility are return of flatus and first BM (Bauer et al., 1985) Practice Recommendation: Assess for flatus & first BM Monitor for ileus

  22. Conclusion Discuss issues when critiquing the literature Discuss approaches for making clinical decisions based on the evidence Design evidence-based practice recommendations for your EBP Project

  23. Your Turn! Turn your articles face-down Take a deep breath Take a birds-eye view Think about all of your evidence (to-date) Ask yourself: What is the literature telling me to do? Write three (3) evidence-based recommendations for your EBP Project When done, turn your articles over: Put citations & level of evidence after each recommendation

Related


More Related Content