London Conference on Climate Change: Day 2 Program
Generously supported by private donors, the London Conference on Climate Change continues with a dense program on the 2nd day at Conway Hall. Expert speakers present papers challenging mainstream narratives, promoting open dialogue, and emphasizing the importance of time management during sessions. Attendees engage in debates, discussions, and a general discourse aimed at fostering a deeper understanding of climate issues and geoethics.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
WELCOME BACK to the 2ndday of the LONDON CONFERENCE on CLIMATE CHANGE: Science & Geoethics at Conway Hall September 8 and 9, 2016 Organized by the Independent Committee on Geoethics (ICG) Nils-Axel M rner, Secretary-General
Welcome to ATTEND LISTEN DEBATE and experience The New Dawn of Truth
Day-2 program September 9
Commentary Notes A duck or a rabbit but certainly not a rat
We have a dense program today, too We have to work together to keep time that is: The speakers must keep their time The Chair-persons must watch the time The Questions & Comments must be to the point The day ends with a General Discussion where the time-frames are looser and we hope for a good dialogue
This conference is made possible by generous donations In calendar order of donation from: Madhav Khandekar Pamela Klein Philip Foster Christopher Monckton Nicola Scafetta Ed Flaherty Michael Limburg Oliver Manuel Albrecht Glatzle Arve Tunstad Tom Wysmuller Maria Araujo Viv Forbes David Bowen Carmen Smith Peter Gill Peter Ward Ned Nikolov Benjamin Huguet Axel Henning Nils-Axel M rner Jan-Erik & Gunvor Solheim Trygve Eklund Alex Pope Pierre Bouteille Fraocois Gauchenot Rpbertt Heath Axel Henney Camille Veyers Narendra Limbu Wiliam Bailey Benjamin Huguet Michael Jefferson Peter Kirby Michael Purves Benoit Rittaud Ian Tayler Karl Zeller Justine Darawska John Graham and non-attending persons: Konrad Hartman Andrew Williams John Billot Mark Fowler Caroline Kettle Edward Hurst Alfred Stoller Brett Keane Robert Delnon Richard Dommer Francis Lyon All private persons making personal donations
Down-streamers and mainstreamers follow the main flow which contains a lot of garbage and dead fishes Up-streamers go against the main flow, which costs both strength and courage i.e. in science: deep knowledge and vivid vigour It is true that all the papers presented will be given by up-streamers ( climate realists , as we say, and climate deniers as Ban Ki Moon says) All speakers give their papers as subject specialists (i.e. with no hidden agenda or organisation behind) At the General Discussions, I call for an open debate with respect of different opinions
So, dear Participants be very welcome to this second day: have fun take part in the discussions and help us to make this conference truly interesting and constructive In the real world there is, indeed, much to discuss and learn* *Michael Jefferson said it in 2010: How much do we really know about climate change? Not as much as we might like. And we should not pretend otherwise.
All these lies, it makes my head spin! An e-mail comment by one of our participants
The mean curve of 102 CO2-driven (i.e. AGW) models (green) giving a rise of +2.7 C ( 0.7) by year 2100 and the observational readings of true temperature changes on Earth s surface (red) and in the troposphere (blue) indicating a temperature below +1 C by year 2100. Obviously, there is a significant disagreement between Models and Observations. In Science, we always have to prioritized observational facts. At the COP21 agreement, they prioritized models and ignored observations. Therefore, it is an urgent need to go back to the primary facts: i.e. ad fonts
The Big CO2 Illusion in focus today We are gathered to explore if the idea of a CO2-driven global warming is real or just another hoax (bluff). The post-industrial and post-war rise in atmospheric CO2 seem to have: Little (maybe even negligible) effect on global temperature No effect at all Negligible effect on global acidification on sea level changes Therefore, the recent rise in atmospheric CO2 rather seems beneficial to the Plant Kingdom, and hence to life on Planet Earth. The claim of an urgent need of a transition into a low carbon Earth seems exaggerated, unfounded and illusive.
