Mathematical Expression Parsing and Evaluation
The code segments are dedicated to parsing and evaluating mathematical expressions. It includes functions for cleaning input strings, tokenizing expressions, converting infix to postfix notation, and evaluating postfix expressions. The program processes arithmetic operations such as addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, exponentiation, and floor division. There are also discussions on the errors in operand precedence handling and calculating expressions incorrectly.
Download Presentation
Please find below an Image/Link to download the presentation.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.If you encounter any issues during the download, it is possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.
You are allowed to download the files provided on this website for personal or commercial use, subject to the condition that they are used lawfully. All files are the property of their respective owners.
The content on the website is provided AS IS for your information and personal use only. It may not be sold, licensed, or shared on other websites without obtaining consent from the author.
E N D
Presentation Transcript
Harald S. Kobbe Advokat H LL. M Tvistel sning Norwegian Arbitration Day 2023 PO 1 as a vehicle to ensure effectivity, predictability and transparency Best practice A Norwegian perspective Harald S. Kobbe, Advokat (H) LL.M, harald@kobbe.as www.kobbe.as
Harald S. Kobbe Advokat H LL. M Tvistel sning The goal An arbitral process based on the relevant fundamental principles, with the necessary level of efficiency , predictability and transparency. Everyone engaged or involved in an arbitration process, - and who wants it to work and succeed -, agrees that one should strive for this. harald@kobbe.as www.kobbe.as
Harald S. Kobbe Advokat H LL. M Tvistel sning How do we get there? Which instruments or tools do we have? The Arbitration Act of 14th May 2004 Based on UNCITRAL s model law Chapter 6 cover the procedures and proceedings 21 Within the framework of the parties' agreement and the law here, the arbitral tribunal shall deal with the case in the manner it deems appropriate. As soon as the arbitral tribunal has been appointed, it or its chairman shall, after discussion with the parties, determine a plan for the further proceedings, unless otherwise agreed. harald@kobbe.as www.kobbe.as
Harald S. Kobbe Advokat H LL. M Tvistel sning What does this entail? Ones background and general point of view, - perspective of the arbitration and the process A judge or experienced lawyer will probably feel reasonably comfortable but the parties to the arbitration, and not the least foreign parties, might see it differently - as might foreign lawyers/legal counsels They would like to have something more tangible and detailed in writing to feel sufficiently confident that they are about to enter into a fair arbitral process that is both efficient, predictable and transparent harald@kobbe.as www.kobbe.as
Harald S. Kobbe Advokat H LL. M Tvistel sning How to achieve this? The flexibility of the Norwegian Arbitration Act allows for numerous and various approaches within the framework of what the parties have agreed PO 1 is not a traditionally often used instrument/tool in Norway We usually base the proceedings on the plan established by the tribunal according to 21 But is this more of a formal difference than a material different approach? Typical items of a traditional Norwegian plan for an arbitration. The NOMA CMC matrix And other points may be included harald@kobbe.as www.kobbe.as
Harald S. Kobbe Advokat H LL. M Tvistel sning What is particularly important to include to achieve an efficient, predictable and transparent process? Both in a PO 1 and in a plan for the proceedings A joint understanding and a feeling of ownership to the content A definition of the case/dispute The schedule Time limits Cut off-dates Authority and process if they are to be extended Presentation of evidence Witnesses; - who, how and when Expert witnesses; - who, how and when Requests for evidence from opposing party harald@kobbe.as www.kobbe.as
Harald S. Kobbe Advokat H LL. M Tvistel sning harald@kobbe.as www.kobbe.as
